collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: WA Wolves - more than estimated  (Read 3431 times)

Offline KFhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 34512
  • Location: NE Corner
WA Wolves - more than estimated
« on: March 23, 2012, 11:23:58 PM »
Was listining to the local radio station - KCRK 92.1 and they were saying that WDFW or someone came out and admitted that their estimation of the population of wolves in WA was under by about half
 
something like 10 packs already
 
 
trying to find the link, anyone know where KCRK got that information?  I didn't catch it all was hoping someone had a link or statement.
 
hoping it'll speed delisting in WA
 
Then they went on to talk about ID and extending the season and such

Offline steen

  • Women's Board
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 1789
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #1 on: March 24, 2012, 08:34:07 AM »
Kinda like mice, if you see one there are a hundred you don't see.   :chuckle:

Offline predatorpro

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1719
  • Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2012, 08:37:13 AM »
u mean the government doesnt know about every single wolf here lol

Offline BAR C3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: Reardan, WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2012, 08:45:23 AM »
The Spokesman Review had an article either yesterday or day before saying there was ten packs. Better add 5 to that if the game departement is reporting that.  :mgun:

Offline Sumpnneedskillin

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 1614
  • Location: Pomeroy WA
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2012, 08:56:56 AM »
Was listining to the local radio station - KCRK 92.1 and they were saying that WDFW or someone came out and admitted that their estimation of the population of wolves in WA was under by about half
 
something like 10 packs already
 
 
trying to find the link, anyone know where KCRK got that information?  I didn't catch it all was hoping someone had a link or statement.
 
hoping it'll speed delisting in WA
 
Then they went on to talk about ID and extending the season and such
There's a presentation for the commission that talks about wolves it's somewhere on this page.
http://wdfw.wa.gov/commission/meetings/2012/03/agenda_mar1012.html
What's the most dangerous thing said in the US Navy? -- A Chief Petty Officer saying "Watch this s$%^!!"

"I can imagine no more rewarding a career. And any man who may be asked in this century what he did to make his life worthwhile, I think can respond with a good deal of pride and satisfaction: 'I served in the United States Navy.'"
President John F. Kennedy

Offline Kain

  • Scalpless
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 5859
  • Location: Vantucky, WA
  • VantuckyKain
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #5 on: March 24, 2012, 10:09:40 AM »
Thats about right.  Donny Martorello said cougar population estimate are really only about half of whats out there.  He siad they really have no way of knowing how many kittens and subadults are out there so they dont include them in the numbers.  Probably the same with wolves.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #6 on: March 24, 2012, 11:20:40 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

Online pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45460
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #7 on: March 24, 2012, 11:23:12 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

They won't be butting heads for much long. I'm afraid that the fate of the Woodland Caribou has been signed. Those 45 animals could be gone in 2 years.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: WA Wolves - more than estimated
« Reply #8 on: March 24, 2012, 11:27:45 AM »
With the other states watching this closely to see how our state responds/reacts to the problem,  WDFW wont be able to play the " dumb " card like they have up until now.....

I talked with a person from IFG at the Bighorn Show.....unofficially, he acknowledged there may be some head butting going on between the states over the Woodland Caribous tenuous future.....

They won't be butting heads for much long. I'm afraid that the fate of the Woodland Caribou has been signed. Those 45 animals could be gone in 2 years.

 :yeah:    If it takes that long......all on Washingtons watch......

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Old recessed buck by SkookumHntr
[Today at 08:12:06 AM]


What pond creature am I dealing with here? by waoutdoorsman
[Today at 08:11:07 AM]


Late season in gods Country My big buck by SkookumHntr
[Today at 08:09:40 AM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by bustedoldman
[Today at 07:51:52 AM]


High n Dry gear by metlhead
[Today at 06:26:26 AM]


Colockum WMA chukar hunting by metlhead
[Today at 06:19:26 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by trophyhunt
[Today at 04:29:19 AM]


Long distance love affair by high_hunter
[Today at 12:21:14 AM]


The Okanogan Deer Book by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 09:20:53 PM]


Idaho deer question by Tbob
[Yesterday at 08:20:43 PM]


Best service for estimating draw odds by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 07:50:29 PM]


Cowichie muzzy bull this year by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 07:43:52 PM]


2025 elk success thread!! by 10thmountainarcher
[Yesterday at 07:21:33 PM]


Diarrhea ? by Knocker of rocks
[Yesterday at 06:39:31 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 06:19:55 PM]


Big Bull Elk Hit On Hwy 970? by Roslyn Rambler
[Yesterday at 06:19:23 PM]


My wife found her first shed by NOCK NOCK
[Yesterday at 05:18:09 PM]


Perfect evening hunt by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 05:16:50 PM]


WA Bucket List….Mule Deer Permit by huntnphool
[Yesterday at 04:44:02 PM]


White River late archery by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 04:23:56 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal