Free: Contests & Raffles.
If you are gonna go with a Remington 700 buy the higher end ones like the Mil spec, or Sendero SF 2, both are outstanding but they are gonna cost around $1100. The Quality control on Remington's lower end like the SPS is really slipping.
I'm hoping not to go over $550 to $600 depending on the deal and the gun.
Tikka or savage both good choices.......not the remington though. Even the really "nice" 700 CDL stainless fluted i bought was poorly put together.
Cant go wrong with a Ruger Hawkeye.
Bolt handle was poorly placed or machined(not to mention i cant believe they still solder them on) to where the bolt handle and action started to hit and mushroom the steel away from eachother. It also had one misfire where the pin dropped upon closing of the bolt. I took apart everything and put it back together adjusted to my satisfaction and wants after that and it didnt happen again. When I went home I took apart two older remingtons, a 1976 BDL? and an early 80's sportsman 78 and they both felt nicer than my 2008CDL.I've heard that the magic date for getting a nice remington is prior to 2001.
For the money, I would look at a howa/vanguard or tikka.
Quote from: ing on April 07, 2012, 06:25:58 AMCant go wrong with a Ruger Hawkeye.yes you can.a quote"I've owned & seen a few M77's that were true sub-MOA rifles, but I've also seen a couple that came out w/ the barrel cross-threaded, a snable that change POI by 6" w/ 3 shots from barrel heating. Ruger's biggest problem is there are a bunch of rifles out there that are a lot better buys for the same or less, the Tikka being one of the top choices..."then other members have issues with them. I think thats where I got my siggy from. A guy tried to get me to buy one off him over here. He let me take it to the range and it couldnt do better than a 4+ inch group. He apologised and changed the scope....... didnt shoot any better. Didnt buy that one for sure. I consider buying every rifle I see honestly..... just rugers get a bit less consideration.