Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: link=topic=96267.msg1256289#msg1256289 date=1335902193That comes across as a diversion...steers the reader to consider the gloom and doom prophesy of lost broadheads being stepped on and causing injury.
Quote from: Snapshot on May 01, 2012, 01:33:12 PMQuote from: link=topic=96267.msg1256289#msg1256289 date=1335902193That comes across as a diversion...steers the reader to consider the gloom and doom prophesy of lost broadheads being stepped on and causing injury. Says the man using "doom and gloom" tactics to equate luminoks with lost days in the field, oh the hypocrisy of it all!
Quote from: Chase 1 on April 30, 2012, 11:32:25 PMI've responded truthfully and factually to everything that's been asked. My understanding is the proposal was put to the department as a request from a sportsman and after department review it was added to the public review process. That's how the process works. And reviewed it was. Who actually filed the request, don't know the man beyond his testimony to the commission. I do know that he answered to all the trumped up claims of the opposition that your referring too, at the commission meeting. If you want to know what he said, give it a listen. Careful not to drink the koolaid until you know who made it, you never know what they might of put in it. In bold kind of backs what I have heard. Like you said it was presented by "A" sportsman. And if true this sportsman had friends that would greatly benefit from these becoming legal. No where does the request of one person gain such considerartion unless there is some other source of backing. Think about it. WHere is all of this coming from because I didn't see it.As for all the name calling and what not c'mon gow up. Like the request for 10,000 signatures I too want facts. Not just the ones that support it's passage but was this proposal even brought about in an ethical way. Lobbyists should be placed next to poachers neither one has the interest of hunters or the resource that we hunt.
I've responded truthfully and factually to everything that's been asked. My understanding is the proposal was put to the department as a request from a sportsman and after department review it was added to the public review process. That's how the process works. And reviewed it was. Who actually filed the request, don't know the man beyond his testimony to the commission. I do know that he answered to all the trumped up claims of the opposition that your referring too, at the commission meeting. If you want to know what he said, give it a listen. Careful not to drink the koolaid until you know who made it, you never know what they might of put in it.
Quote from: huntnphool on May 01, 2012, 02:35:44 PMQuote from: Snapshot on May 01, 2012, 01:33:12 PMQuote from: link=topic=96267.msg1256289#msg1256289 date=1335902193That comes across as a diversion...steers the reader to consider the gloom and doom prophesy of lost broadheads being stepped on and causing injury. Says the man using "doom and gloom" tactics to equate luminoks with lost days in the field, oh the hypocrisy of it all! Egads, phool, I took the diversion page from your book...(post #263)
Matt, that is how they make the numbers look more equal to the MF hunters. Allow archers to take more cows but provide MF with a ton more antlered opportunities. The complaint of archers taking more mature bulls is even more bogus.
As for name calling and such, your just showing that you haven't really read this thread. I have kept that out of how I have interacted with guys on the opposite side of the issue... even when the same is not extended to me. I can attack an issue without attacking the person. I will however hold folks accountable for the things they say that are simply not true. Spreading misinformation is something I simply can't stomach. If you truly want the facts, find them for yourself, then you can make a decision based on what you know rather than what you've heard.
Quote from: Chase 1 on May 01, 2012, 03:33:03 PMAs for name calling and such, your just showing that you haven't really read this thread. I have kept that out of how I have interacted with guys on the opposite side of the issue... even when the same is not extended to me. I can attack an issue without attacking the person. I will however hold folks accountable for the things they say that are simply not true. Spreading misinformation is something I simply can't stomach. If you truly want the facts, find them for yourself, then you can make a decision based on what you know rather than what you've heard.I wasn't refering to you or any one person. So don't take things too seriously or rhetorically. Aren't you a board member of an archery org?
Quote from: Matt on May 02, 2012, 07:33:18 AMQuote from: Chase 1 on May 01, 2012, 03:33:03 PMAs for name calling and such, your just showing that you haven't really read this thread. I have kept that out of how I have interacted with guys on the opposite side of the issue... even when the same is not extended to me. I can attack an issue without attacking the person. I will however hold folks accountable for the things they say that are simply not true. Spreading misinformation is something I simply can't stomach. If you truly want the facts, find them for yourself, then you can make a decision based on what you know rather than what you've heard.I wasn't refering to you or any one person. So don't take things too seriously or rhetorically. Aren't you a board member of an archery org?It was a direct reply to one of my posts so it was hard to see how it wasn't directed to me. If you want to direct a comment on a thread to everyone, just post it as a reply, rather than a reply to a quote. That may help avoid any misunderstanding.
As for all the name calling and what not c'mon gow up.
Wasn't it you that just posted this? C'mon man, your better than that.
Quote from: Chase 1 on May 02, 2012, 01:00:55 PMWasn't it you that just posted this? C'mon man, your better than that. That wasn't name calling. Come on didn't you see the little guy laughin. I just thought that it was funny how you was giving me lessons on proper posting. Now can we get back to arguin nocks.
