collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season  (Read 3766 times)

Offline duckmen1

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2558
  • Location: outdoors
electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« on: April 16, 2012, 04:40:28 PM »
wdfw finalized there decision to keep the electronic decoys banned from waterfowl hunting.
this was just posted under latest news on the wdfw website.
they also kept luminocks banned from archery hunting.
Maturity is when you have the power to destroy someone who did you wrong but instead you breathe, walk away, and let life take care of them.

Offline AWS

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1838
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2012, 05:12:56 PM »
Well at least they didn't ban the new lead compensating fire control sight system with hen differentiator, if it's in range it's dead and no mistake hens.  E-decoys I can live without.
After the first shot the rest are just noise.

Make mine a Minaska

Offline ICEMAN

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 15575
  • Location: Olympia
  • The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2012, 06:07:42 PM »
wdfw finalized there decision to keep the electronic decoys banned from waterfowl hunting.
this was just posted under latest news on the wdfw website.
they also kept luminocks banned from archery hunting.

This should really impress alot of hunters... :bash:
molṑn labé

A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head

Kill your television....do it now.....

Don't make me hurt you.

“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”  John Wayne

Offline Tealer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 811
electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2012, 09:49:25 PM »
I'm glad they kept the ban.

Offline steeleywhopper

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1670
  • Location: Snohomish co.
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2012, 09:53:16 PM »
If it's legal in other states it should be legal here as well.
Politicians like Jay Inslee are the reason we have the 2nd Amendment

Offline johnnyaustin44

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 1126
  • Location: Arlington
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2012, 10:05:42 PM »
I'm glad as well. Yeah dealing with other options for wing movement can be a real pain sometimes but when its working it makes all th difference. everyone would have a battery operated decoy if they became legal which in turn would make hunting without one on public land would be almost pointless to try and compete with all the guys who have multiple. glad they kept it how it is

Offline muzbuster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2011
  • Posts: 483
  • Location: Pierce Co.
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2012, 09:23:27 AM »
Well at least they didn't ban the new lead compensating fire control sight system with hen differentiator, if it's in range it's dead and no mistake hens.  E-decoys I can live without.
:lol4:  lmao!

Offline duckdog98604

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 34
  • Location: WA
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2012, 11:45:48 AM »
I'm glad they kept the ban.

 :tup:  :tup: 
100% Freelance Hunter....

Offline seth30

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6438
  • Location: Whidbey Island
  • It's time to HUNT!
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #8 on: April 24, 2012, 04:42:14 PM »
Im glad as well.  Too MANY slob hunter's out there on the marsh's and ponds that leave there trash, and spent shell's.  If they allow it, then you can add batteries to the trash pile as well. :twocents:  The lighnted nocks on the other hand, I just dont understand that?? 
Rather be dead than cool.
Kurt Cobain

Offline h2ofowlr

  • CHOKED UP TIGHT
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 9120
  • Location: In the "Blind"! Go Cougs!
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2012, 03:25:14 PM »
Someguys just can't get those birds without complexes and electronic decoys.  How do you think they feel, spending all that money and still sucking.  Common give them a break.   :lol4:
Cut em!
It's not the shells!  It's the shooter!

Offline seth30

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 6438
  • Location: Whidbey Island
  • It's time to HUNT!
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2012, 03:30:45 PM »
 :llam:
Rather be dead than cool.
Kurt Cobain

Offline duckkillerclyde

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 119
  • Location: Pacific Wonderland
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2012, 11:57:54 PM »
I don't use electronic decoys nor would I if they were legal but all of that being said I wish they were legal. 

We have to have laws that protect people and their property but some laws we could do without.  All the outlawing of electronic decoys has done is create bigger government.  :tup:

Offline Chase 1

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Posts: 359
  • Location: Snohomish County
Re: electronic decoys still banned for 2012 season
« Reply #12 on: May 04, 2012, 12:29:14 AM »
IMO this could have past had limitations been written into the rule...two per spread regardless of party size...or something like that? I think the sticking point was the fear of a "robo spread" on Golden Pond. Lively debate at the Commission vote, at least a couple may have voted the other way had limits been in place. Not sure it would have got the 5 needed but it would have been closer. I would expect to see this one again, but with limits.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Anti-Snagging Rule ? by CP
[Today at 05:56:37 PM]


Bass Pro Strikes Again by Badhabit
[Today at 05:45:32 PM]


Ten Years, and still plugging along by bearpaw
[Today at 05:27:36 PM]


High buck hunt by savagehunter
[Today at 04:28:28 PM]


Lund Fisherman 1800 info/advice by BD1
[Today at 04:04:09 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by bmc02
[Today at 03:58:27 PM]


Scope/mount options Ruger Ranch 5.56 by Westside88
[Today at 03:31:01 PM]


Bear Meat Care after the shot by jrebel
[Today at 03:24:19 PM]


More Kings! by trophyhunt
[Today at 01:35:26 PM]


Montana Antelope Draw by bustedoldman
[Today at 11:11:02 AM]


WSTA 2025 Summer Rendezvous Agenda by Humptulips
[Today at 10:54:35 AM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by kodiak06
[Today at 10:34:16 AM]


Looking for River Bank Salmon Fishing Help, Tips, etc: Lewis Co Area by AROTTY
[Today at 07:39:42 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by tdot24
[Today at 07:34:07 AM]


Pinks! by brocka
[Today at 07:12:17 AM]


Cat tracks? by mountainman
[Today at 02:21:59 AM]


Leupold scope recommendation by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 10:22:41 PM]


AUCTION: Custom knife by Alden Cole by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 09:31:48 PM]


Got your bear ID test done..🤟 by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 07:36:29 PM]


Share your out of state experience by jackelope
[Yesterday at 06:52:14 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal