Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: NWWABOWHNTR on April 18, 2012, 08:12:01 PMhell call them Star Trek weapons I don't care. Hey, no electronics now.
hell call them Star Trek weapons I don't care.
Quote from: huntnphool on April 18, 2012, 08:21:01 PMQuote from: NWWABOWHNTR on April 18, 2012, 08:12:01 PMhell call them Star Trek weapons I don't care. Hey, no electronics now. Heck with a light saber I might not get rocks thrown at me by Bigfoot this year!
Quote from: NWWABOWHNTR on April 18, 2012, 08:23:13 PMQuote from: huntnphool on April 18, 2012, 08:21:01 PMQuote from: NWWABOWHNTR on April 18, 2012, 08:12:01 PMhell call them Star Trek weapons I don't care. Hey, no electronics now. Heck with a light saber I might not get rocks thrown at me by Bigfoot this year! I think light sabers were from Star WARS not Star Trek
Go ahead and feel good about yourself as you use your recurve, but your synthetic string, modern broadhead, Ford F250, Garmin GPS, and Kenetrek boots are all rather hypocritical.
The first bows were invented 64,000 years ago. The first bows with heads attached to arrows with sinew was 16,000 years ago. To claim that a bow outfit designed and invented 20-40 years ago is ridiculous. It's not even close to what has been considered primitive or traditional to the invention of a bow over time. Go ahead and feel good about yourself as you use your recurve, but your synthetic string, modern broadhead, Ford F250, Garmin GPS, and Kenetrek boots are all rather hypocritical. In the end, it depends on the person you ask to what is traditional. But to claim that a brief time in recent advancements is somehow traditional is crazy. People just 500 years ago would think the equipment Howard Hill and Fred Bear used was modern. How are they the standard at which we should set for traditional? Who says you get to decide? You (or Fred Bear or Howard Hill) get to decide a point in the 99.8% history at which there have been bows to decide to draw the "traditional" line? This is fun stuff! Can we argue anymore about nothing?
Who says you get to decide? You (or Fred Bear or Howard Hill) get to decide a point in the 99.8% history at which there have been bows to decide to draw the "traditional" line? This is fun stuff! Can we argue anymore about nothing?