collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Vortex Diamondbacks  (Read 3024 times)

Offline Abolt338

  • Volunteer Wild Animal Population Control Specialist
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 151
  • Location: Cashmere, WA / Los Angeles, CA
Vortex Diamondbacks
« on: August 07, 2008, 03:25:59 PM »
Saw a post on these, did some research, seem to be a good bang for the buck.  Question:  Should I get the 8x42s or the 10x42s and why?

RW
There's no place like the middle of nowhere!!!

Offline T-ROY

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 275
  • Location: NW WA
Re: Vortex Diamondbacks
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2008, 04:02:16 PM »
8's are i little more user friendly when your only looking a couple of hundred yards into a clear cut all day long. my oppinion

Offline Abolt338

  • Volunteer Wild Animal Population Control Specialist
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2008
  • Posts: 151
  • Location: Cashmere, WA / Los Angeles, CA
Re: Vortex Diamondbacks
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2008, 05:01:00 PM »
In what situations would the 10s be a better fit?

RW
There's no place like the middle of nowhere!!!

Offline Sagedawg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 657
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Vortex Diamondbacks
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2008, 05:07:25 PM »
IMO, the 8' would do you better for most of your hunting. However if you hunt a lot of open country and are will to pack a tripod the the 10's and above get the nod. I carry 15's in my truck when Im out scouting so I can look under the rock ledges and eyebrows. These are mounted on a windoe mount and they dont bounce and vibrate, and you are able to find animals at an amazing distance. When I start a stalk I use 8x42, and they work great. Hope this helps.



   Sage

Offline FOsteology

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 171
Re: Vortex Diamondbacks
« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2008, 08:43:44 PM »
It's a personal choice, but I'd take an 8x over 10x....

An 8x will have better resolution, larger FOV, larger exit pupil, brighter for longer in twilight, have less image shake, and easier on the eyes for extended glassing sessions.

The only benefit to a 10x is better "twilight factor", and of course, higher magnification.

Personally, I much prefer my 7x42 Ultravid for all around use. Fewer glass elements than both the 8x and 10x, a larger exit pupil, less image shake, and a HUGE FOV. A quality 7x is like looking through a picture window. For strain-free glassing, absolutely nothing beats them! IMHO and IME, if more magnification is needed,....a lot more than 10X will be required! In which case out comes the BIG Eye binoculars (13x or 15x) or a good spotter.  :twocents:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Reloder 22 In Stock by Rigby416
[Today at 01:25:50 AM]


Muzzleloader scope options by Rigby416
[Today at 01:23:58 AM]


Night force NXS 5.5-22x50 by Craigchilcott
[Today at 01:22:05 AM]


Illinois, No Doubter by wafisherman
[Yesterday at 09:31:04 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by northwesthunter84
[Yesterday at 09:15:21 PM]


Let's talk tags by link
[Yesterday at 09:13:12 PM]


What boots? by mboyle0828
[Yesterday at 08:51:29 PM]


Late season archery Roosevelt tips by dreadi
[Yesterday at 08:02:09 PM]


Pepper Jack tillimook by Blacklab
[Yesterday at 07:38:57 PM]


2025 Quality Chewuch Tag by Schmalzfam
[Yesterday at 07:35:41 PM]


New world record mule? by High Climber
[Yesterday at 06:45:04 PM]


Real world feedback needed: Rangefinder Binos by Sakko300wsm
[Yesterday at 06:17:12 PM]


Late Alta Muzzy by ghosthunter
[Yesterday at 04:51:25 PM]


Eastern Washington Late Archery by Pegasus
[Yesterday at 02:49:37 PM]


Calling Bears by dilleytech
[Yesterday at 01:46:49 PM]


Xlr element vs mdt hnt26 by Camo
[Yesterday at 01:04:21 PM]


Bow shop around tacoma-seattle area? by pianoman9701
[Yesterday at 12:55:48 PM]


East Oak smokers? by Sandberm
[Yesterday at 09:52:22 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal