collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit  (Read 17080 times)

Offline Loup Loup

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2020
  • Posts: 485
  • Location: NCW
  • Groups: WSTA, ITA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters, F4WM
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #45 on: January 07, 2025, 07:53:50 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.

Offline hunter399

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2014
  • Posts: 8986
  • Location: In Your Hunting Spot
  • Groups: NRA RMEF
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #46 on: January 07, 2025, 08:12:59 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Ya poor job performance was basically what I was trying to point out in this topic earlier today.

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3076
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #47 on: January 07, 2025, 09:41:46 PM »
Wonder if the the two WDFW “scientists” that killed the wolf while collaring it by overdosing it in the Okanogan last winter got a just reward for their incompetency’s.
Or were they successful in deflecting the killing toward someone else.
Anytime you go hands on a wild animal you run the risk of it dieing.  This is/ was very unfortunate, regardless of species.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9693
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Wolf numbers higher than state will admit
« Reply #48 on: January 07, 2025, 11:03:37 PM »
You could apply this to every predator specie in WA. And then with every prey specie in this state you could also apply the same logic telling us there is way more deer and elk than we all know.Nothing that comes out from WDFW is truthful and is garbage. The criteria to actually recognize a pack is ridiculous 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Idaho deer question by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 11:08:25 PM]


good area for idaho elk open to public by pd
[Yesterday at 10:29:47 PM]


Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by Westside88
[Yesterday at 09:00:34 PM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by ASHQUACK
[Yesterday at 08:55:35 PM]


Blackstone newbie by kenzmad
[Yesterday at 08:48:46 PM]


Anyone own a Hewescraft Sportsman 160? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 08:23:33 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by HUNTINCOUPLE
[Yesterday at 08:03:41 PM]


Tease 'l' by highcountry_hunter
[Yesterday at 07:43:59 PM]


Quality deer hunt by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 07:36:09 PM]


Ice fishing for walleye by Russ McDonald
[Yesterday at 07:05:13 PM]


Put a ring on it by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 05:20:59 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by 509
[Yesterday at 05:18:11 PM]


Pointing Dog Trainer by wildweeds
[Yesterday at 04:52:56 PM]


Homemade saltwater fishing gear by Wetwoodshunter
[Yesterday at 04:32:08 PM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by JWBINX
[Yesterday at 02:55:36 PM]


The Lookback by bearhunter99
[Yesterday at 01:06:08 PM]


This year, last year by Caseknife
[Yesterday at 12:58:10 PM]


Stickers by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 12:16:11 PM]


From Behind by boneaddict
[Yesterday at 11:48:13 AM]


Kubota repair shop by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:40:20 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal