collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Weyco eyes charging at St. Helens  (Read 5603 times)

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Weyco eyes charging at St. Helens
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2013, 08:58:45 AM »
“We want to keep our lands open to the general public, but it’s become increasingly challenging and costly in recent years,” Chavez said, citing vandalism and garbage dumping."

We need a $5000 fine for dumping and vandalism. Bonus points for turning in these selfish and derelict slobs that are ruining access to private lands.

The idea that recent garbage dumping led to charging is a myth and an industry "talking point".  Heck, in SW Washington a volunteer group started picking up garbage the year  BEFORE they locked the gates. They probably did a survey and found out people respond more positively if they say the closures are due to dumping vs. trying  to get Money.  Remember, these areas were mostly walk-in.  Even tweekers don't haul their garbage in on their backs (they actually work quite diligently to bring stuff out!).  Weyco's presentation to investor tells the real story: they made 19-million last year in the south on leases and part of their strategy is to squeeze every dollar they can from every acre.  That's how REITS are set up.  Stopping garbage dumping won't stop the fees.  They only way to change the fees is to make it MORE profitable to NOT charge.  The only way to do that is to change (or threaten to change) their property tax breaks.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45487
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Weyco eyes charging at St. Helens
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2013, 09:32:45 AM »
“We want to keep our lands open to the general public, but it’s become increasingly challenging and costly in recent years,” Chavez said, citing vandalism and garbage dumping."

We need a $5000 fine for dumping and vandalism. Bonus points for turning in these selfish and derelict slobs that are ruining access to private lands.

The idea that recent garbage dumping led to charging is a myth and an industry "talking point".  Heck, in SW Washington a volunteer group started picking up garbage the year  BEFORE they locked the gates. They probably did a survey and found out people respond more positively if they say the closures are due to dumping vs. trying  to get Money.  Remember, these areas were mostly walk-in.  Even tweekers don't haul their garbage in on their backs (they actually work quite diligently to bring stuff out!).  Weyco's presentation to investor tells the real story: they made 19-million last year in the south on leases and part of their strategy is to squeeze every dollar they can from every acre.  That's how REITS are set up.  Stopping garbage dumping won't stop the fees.  They only way to change the fees is to make it MORE profitable to NOT charge.  The only way to do that is to change (or threaten to change) their property tax breaks.

So you've "jumped the head guy" and expected to get him to open up to you. We're talking about a different approach, one which will hopefully either prove your theory right or wrong. Starting a positive dialogue with WEYCO is the first step. If we find they aren't receptive to having hunter conservationists help them with dumping and vandalism and still want to charge for passes, then we'll go another route and push for legislative alternatives to their present tax rates. Please feel free to join our meeting on Dec. 4th if you'd like to learn more.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

Offline fireweed

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 1307
  • Location: Toutle, Wa
Re: Weyco eyes charging at St. Helens
« Reply #17 on: October 14, 2013, 09:52:58 AM »
“We want to keep our lands open to the general public, but it’s become increasingly challenging and costly in recent years,” Chavez said, citing vandalism and garbage dumping."

We need a $5000 fine for dumping and vandalism. Bonus points for turning in these selfish and derelict slobs that are ruining access to private lands.

The idea that recent garbage dumping led to charging is a myth and an industry "talking point".  Heck, in SW Washington a volunteer group started picking up garbage the year  BEFORE they locked the gates. They probably did a survey and found out people respond more positively if they say the closures are due to dumping vs. trying  to get Money.  Remember, these areas were mostly walk-in.  Even tweekers don't haul their garbage in on their backs (they actually work quite diligently to bring stuff out!).  Weyco's presentation to investor tells the real story: they made 19-million last year in the south on leases and part of their strategy is to squeeze every dollar they can from every acre.  That's how REITS are set up.  Stopping garbage dumping won't stop the fees.  They only way to change the fees is to make it MORE profitable to NOT charge.  The only way to do that is to change (or threaten to change) their property tax breaks.

So you've "jumped the head guy" and expected to get him to open up to you. We're talking about a different approach, one which will hopefully either prove your theory right or wrong. Starting a positive dialogue with WEYCO is the first step. If we find they aren't receptive to having hunter conservationists help them with dumping and vandalism and still want to charge for passes, then we'll go another route and push for legislative alternatives to their present tax rates. Please feel free to join our meeting on Dec. 4th if you'd like to learn more.

OK, so jumped isn't correct.  I was at a meeting with him and brought it up.  Of course he is just the messenger.  SW Washington Land Access Coalition has been doing what you suggest for several years including monitoring gates during hunting season.  They get WDFW grants to cover their expenses.  I have their contacts if you want them.

Offline pianoman9701

  • Mushroom Man
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 45487
  • Location: Vancouver USA
  • Mortgage Licenses in WA, ID, & OR NMLS #2014743
    • www.facebook.com/johnwallacemortgage
    • John Wallace Mortgage
Re: Weyco eyes charging at St. Helens
« Reply #18 on: October 14, 2013, 10:13:05 AM »
“We want to keep our lands open to the general public, but it’s become increasingly challenging and costly in recent years,” Chavez said, citing vandalism and garbage dumping."

We need a $5000 fine for dumping and vandalism. Bonus points for turning in these selfish and derelict slobs that are ruining access to private lands.

The idea that recent garbage dumping led to charging is a myth and an industry "talking point".  Heck, in SW Washington a volunteer group started picking up garbage the year  BEFORE they locked the gates. They probably did a survey and found out people respond more positively if they say the closures are due to dumping vs. trying  to get Money.  Remember, these areas were mostly walk-in.  Even tweekers don't haul their garbage in on their backs (they actually work quite diligently to bring stuff out!).  Weyco's presentation to investor tells the real story: they made 19-million last year in the south on leases and part of their strategy is to squeeze every dollar they can from every acre.  That's how REITS are set up.  Stopping garbage dumping won't stop the fees.  They only way to change the fees is to make it MORE profitable to NOT charge.  The only way to do that is to change (or threaten to change) their property tax breaks.

So you've "jumped the head guy" and expected to get him to open up to you. We're talking about a different approach, one which will hopefully either prove your theory right or wrong. Starting a positive dialogue with WEYCO is the first step. If we find they aren't receptive to having hunter conservationists help them with dumping and vandalism and still want to charge for passes, then we'll go another route and push for legislative alternatives to their present tax rates. Please feel free to join our meeting on Dec. 4th if you'd like to learn more.

OK, so jumped isn't correct.  I was at a meeting with him and brought it up.  Of course he is just the messenger.  SW Washington Land Access Coalition has been doing what you suggest for several years including monitoring gates during hunting season.  They get WDFW grants to cover their expenses.  I have their contacts if you want them.

I'd love to have those contacts as well as your input. We'd be benefitting from your participation.
"Restricting the rights of law-abiding citizens based on the actions of criminals and madmen will have no positive effect on the future acts of criminals and madmen. It will only serve to reduce individual rights and the very security of our republic." - Pianoman https://linktr.ee/johnlwallace https://valoaneducator.tv/johnwallace-2014743

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Stickers by Brute
[Today at 11:56:27 AM]


Tease 'l' by Pathfinder101
[Today at 11:50:31 AM]


GO 2025 15th Annual Hunting-Washington Christmas Gift Exchange by D-Rock425
[Today at 11:42:28 AM]


Is it a conflict of interest by Tbar
[Today at 11:34:01 AM]


30-40 Yard Shots at Coyotes using the NocPix Rico 2 S75R 1280 by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 11:15:25 AM]


This year, last year by ballpark
[Today at 10:39:21 AM]


more mass?, not sure I care by OutHouse
[Today at 10:25:41 AM]


The Lookback by OutHouse
[Today at 10:24:23 AM]


Late Achery Hunt 💥VIDEO💥 by jstone
[Today at 09:50:43 AM]


Degreasing A Deer Skull by hunter399
[Today at 08:01:17 AM]


Moose in western washington? by kball4
[Today at 06:19:20 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Wanttohuntmore
[Yesterday at 10:14:01 PM]


Seekins PH3 by Hitsman3
[Yesterday at 08:21:48 PM]


Mule Deer Management Zones by Swervingtrouts
[Yesterday at 07:53:26 PM]


Smelt ? by Crunchy
[Yesterday at 06:27:35 PM]


Dodge 48re transmission recommendations by Fastass350
[Yesterday at 06:23:00 PM]


"Any Deer" GMU's - Proof of Sex? by luvmystang67
[Yesterday at 05:30:13 PM]


Montana Cutting Deer Licenses by muleyguy
[Yesterday at 05:28:37 PM]


Who knows electric bikes? looking at Quietkat options by Broomd
[Yesterday at 05:24:20 PM]


Wildlife Obsession Duvall WA Taxidermy Closing its doors by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 03:59:08 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal