collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Chemical Spraying  (Read 14884 times)

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7294
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #105 on: February 15, 2019, 01:37:53 PM »
 :yike:  What!  Your kidding!  Government always said its totally safe!  So NY Cal and Wa all have science that agrees its bad??  41%?  Must be junk garbage fake news again.  Chemical manufactures have studies proof of its safety.  Hold on I have a weed growing by my well house.... :chuckle:
MAGA!  Again..

Offline Buckhunter24

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Posts: 2058
  • Location: Eatonville
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #106 on: February 16, 2019, 06:57:05 PM »
Smoke approval windows are limited and are getting smaller every year.
What are the rules for both the private timber companies, and State land on slash burns etc?   

Everyone keeps bringing up that we need to go back to burning cuts, but I'm guessing they aren't allowed to at least no wholesale.     


Edit to add; Plus it would seem like the # of clear cuts that need to be burned (for a particular landowner) would stack up in the Summer months (burn bans etc), and that would mean that tons of landowners would be burning during hunting seasons.  Including DNR, which would mean I could come on here and read about them screwing over your hunting season.   
 
*used "your" to get the point across, not pointing at anyone in particular.

Offline Mudman

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Apr 2012
  • Posts: 7294
  • Location: Wetside rock garden.
  • Get R Done.
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #107 on: February 16, 2019, 07:04:08 PM »
Like other things in the world if it isn't allowed but demand is there they will find/develop a new hopefully better product.  But it is allowed and makes a HUGE amount of $$ which funds study and political lobby instead of product research to replace poor products, imop.
MAGA!  Again..

Offline WildlifeAssassin

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 343
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #108 on: April 23, 2019, 06:57:11 PM »
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-42860-0

Abstract:
Ancestral environmental exposures to a variety of factors and toxicants have been shown to promote the epigenetic transgenerational inheritance of adult onset disease. One of the most widely used agricultural pesticides worldwide is the herbicide glyphosate (N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine), commonly known as Roundup. There are an increasing number of conflicting reports regarding the direct exposure toxicity (risk) of glyphosate, but no rigorous investigations on the generational actions. The current study using a transient exposure of gestating F0 generation female rats found negligible impacts of glyphosate on the directly exposed F0 generation, or F1 generation offspring pathology. In contrast, dramatic increases in pathologies in the F2 generation grand-offspring, and F3 transgenerational great-grand-offspring were observed. The transgenerational pathologies observed include prostate disease, obesity, kidney disease, ovarian disease, and parturition (birth) abnormalities. Epigenetic analysis of the F1, F2 and F3 generation sperm identified differential DNA methylation regions (DMRs). A number of DMR associated genes were identified and previously shown to be involved in pathologies. Therefore, we propose glyphosate can induce the transgenerational inheritance of disease and germline (e.g. sperm) epimutations. Observations suggest the generational toxicology of glyphosate needs to be considered in the disease etiology of future generations.

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2661
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #109 on: April 23, 2019, 08:21:37 PM »
Chemicals are bad. Adenosine triphosphate. Oh wait, it’s in every cell and our main energy source. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline WildlifeAssassin

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 343
  • Groups: RMEF
Re: Chemical Spraying
« Reply #110 on: April 24, 2019, 06:38:14 AM »
New survey in humans shows link between advanced liver disease and glyphosate

https://www.gmwatch.org/en/news/latest-news/18897

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Let’s see your best Washington buck by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:31:08 PM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 09:43:51 PM]


Walked a cougar down by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 08:31:53 PM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by Encore 280
[Yesterday at 05:16:00 PM]


WTS Suppressors I Can Get by dreadi
[Yesterday at 03:30:33 PM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by Longfield1
[Yesterday at 03:27:51 PM]


Straight on by kentrek
[Yesterday at 03:04:53 PM]


2024-2026 Hunting Season Proposals by trophyhunt
[Yesterday at 01:51:40 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal