collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: MT evidence of sex  (Read 4519 times)

Offline ibuyre

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2015
  • Posts: 122
  • Location: Olympia Wa
  • Groups: NRA, SAF
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2020, 09:47:07 PM »
Sounds like they're copying Wyoming regulations.

That's standard in Wy. Talked to a couple game wardens there and they both recommended. Boning out all meat at kill site and proof of sex, and the tail to show if it was a white tail or mule deer in a zip lock with your punched tag. And to keep that zip lock with your boned out meat. I hunted in Wy and then stopped on the way home and hunted a Mt tag and stopped at a couple Mt check stations. I was a little nervous having a pair of antelope and a couple deer in the freezer from WY. With the zip locks, with sex and tail and tag. They just shrugged and "yep, that's the Wyoming way".

I think it's a great system and a great way to do it. Really clean and nice, and easy for a hunter that's packing things out. I mean. Come on really.... someone's going to have a tail and proof of sex from something other than what the meat is from.... The whole prof of sex naturally attached is a PIA and BS for guys that are hunting in the back country, boning out and packing meat. It's something that should be changed. I like how Wy does it. Sounds like Mt and is going that way as well. Sure be nice is Wa did as well.

Offline callturner

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2020
  • Posts: 768
  • Location: nine mile falls Washington
    • n/a
  • Groups: nra
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2020, 10:36:18 PM »
That's evidence of sex, I'm trying to find the requirement for evidence of species.

Subject says evidence of sex!

Offline Stein

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2013
  • Posts: 13118
  • Location: Arlington
Re: MT evidence of sex
« Reply #17 on: September 22, 2020, 11:06:55 AM »
I just heard back from a MT Warden, "Currently, there in not a requirement or a burden on the hunter for proof of species. "

Surprised me, but no complaints as that makes my life easier and meat cleaner.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

This sucks by jason stevens
[Today at 05:59:55 PM]


AWD – getting unstuck? by branches
[Today at 05:31:10 PM]


5 Points......(mule deer or blacktails) by branches
[Today at 05:28:13 PM]


Curious on you thought about this “tip” by huntnnw
[Today at 05:19:09 PM]


Nosler vs Hornady by KDB
[Today at 05:18:56 PM]


Big J's Powder list by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Today at 02:18:09 PM]


Douglas 108 Moose tag by Bonehuntn
[Today at 01:41:03 PM]


Brother's Ram by stw
[Today at 12:46:44 PM]


Tagged out in Oregon by MADMAX
[Today at 12:28:47 PM]


Major Changes coming to Idaho for Non-Resident Hunters by Brushbuster
[Today at 11:38:14 AM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by C-Money
[Today at 09:46:07 AM]


Area 11 2025 - Well? by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:12:20 AM]


2025 sheds….let's see em by TitusFord
[Today at 05:12:51 AM]


2025 NWTF South Sound Strutters Banquet by wadu1
[Today at 04:28:00 AM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by firtree
[Today at 02:40:26 AM]


Bear rugs by Platensek-po
[Yesterday at 10:02:55 PM]


HUNTNNW 2025 trail cam thread and photos by huntnnw
[Yesterday at 10:00:33 PM]


Need Help on where to go hunting? by Placeofhawks
[Yesterday at 09:56:35 PM]


New 2025 CVA Optima ? by VickGar
[Yesterday at 09:28:21 PM]


Blue Tongue and EHD outbreak in NE Washington by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 09:02:32 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal