collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal  (Read 1074 times)

Offline avidnwoutdoorsman

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2019
  • Posts: 417
  • Location: Northwest
  • Groups: NWTF, PF, TU, DU, BCWF, NRA, BHA, RMEF, VWL
Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« on: October 15, 2025, 03:00:47 PM »
I thought it was already a near act of God to get approval anymore to lethally remove a wolf so I figured it had to be pretty real to need to take one. Yet WWF has found a way to prevent our WDFW from doing its job....

https://wdfw.wa.gov/species-habitats/at-risk/species-recovery/gray-wolf/updates/court-approves-request-temporary-restraining-order-prevent-sherman-wolf-removal

Court approves request for temporary restraining order to prevent Sherman wolf removal
Publish date
Oct. 14, 2025
Today, Oct. 14, 2025, a King County Superior Court commissioner entered a temporary restraining order that prohibits the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) from lethally removing one wolf from the Sherman pack in Ferry County.

As a result, the Department cannot remove a wolf from the Sherman pack as authorized by WDFW Deputy Director Amy Windrope on Oct. 9, 2025. Information about the authorization appears in a separate update.

Washington Wildlife First and other parties filed the initial petition for injunction and motion for a temporary restraining order after the Department announced the Deputy Director’s authorization.

King County Superior Court commissioner Mark Hillman found that the petitioners had met the criteria for temporary injunctive relief. The court will hold a preliminary injunction hearing on Oct. 28, 2025.

WDFW’s 2011 Wolf Conservation and Management Plan (PDF) and wolf-livestock interaction protocol  (PDF)provide guidance on addressing wolf-livestock conflict, including lethal removal to address patterns of depredation, such as when department staff confirms three predations by wolves on livestock within 30 days or four within 10 months, where non-lethal deterrents have not prevented wolf-livestock conflict.
Keep Calm Gobble On

Offline bearhunter99

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 3204
  • Location: Monitor
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2025, 05:00:30 PM »
 :bash: :bash: :bash:

Until we get the courts and "feelings" out of wildlife management we are screwed.  All of these decisions should be made by the wildlife biologists PERIOD.  Same with hound hunting, trapping, etc.....
RIP Colockumelk   :salute:

"We sleep soundly in our beds because rough men stand ready in the night to visit violence on those who would do us harm." – Winston Churchill



Genesis 27:3
Now therefore take, I pray thee, thy weapons, thy quiver and thy bow, and go out to the field, and take me some venison

Offline greenhead_killer

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 2234
  • Location: the burg
  • Groups: wsf life member, wsta, mdf, sci, sscf
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2025, 06:32:24 PM »
Why is a king county judge ruling on what goes on in ferry county? Maybe try and stay in your lane.

Offline time2hunt

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 2813
  • Location: Ellensburg
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2025, 09:37:16 PM »
Sounds like a local issue that should be dealt with appropriately.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Local 3482

Offline Roslyn Rambler

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jan 2024
  • Posts: 72
  • Location: Central Wa
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #4 on: October 18, 2025, 10:12:29 PM »
All this does is, increases the chances of a illegal killing.

A big middle finger to the conservation groups.

Offline HUNTIN4SIX

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 2813
  • Location: NE Washington
  • My wife loves me.
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #5 on: Yesterday at 08:39:26 AM »
Agree with the last two posts.  After one of my cows got attacked by a wolf and 200+ elk ran through all my fences in the last year, I will never call WDFW again.  Any problem with just get handled accordingly.  Their chit show is costing us thousands.....

Offline brokentrail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 568
  • Location: Graham, WA
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #6 on: Yesterday at 11:06:32 AM »
I, myself, would like to see The Sportsmans Alliance, or any other group, in turn, go get the restraining order over-ruled and allow WDFW proceed.  One judge providing a restraining order and one judge saying the restraining order is out of bounds should cancel each other out and allow WDFW to do their job, and also do what was approved within the Wolf Management Plan.

I hope that this King County judge faces disciplinary action for this restraining order, once it is deemed inappropriate, and loses his job.  Judges are supposed to interpret and apply existing laws, the killing of a wolf per an approved management plan doesn't break, or even bend, any existing law.

I also wish WDFW had their own lawyers to do the above, every time some group decides to sue WDFW and keep them from doing their job.

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4805
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 12:54:57 PM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

Offline Humptulips

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9152
  • Location: Humptulips
    • Washington State Trappers Association
  • Groups: WSTA, NTA, FTA, OTA, WWC, WFW, NRA
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 01:10:22 PM »
I, myself, would like to see The Sportsmans Alliance, or any other group, in turn, go get the restraining order over-ruled and allow WDFW proceed.  One judge providing a restraining order and one judge saying the restraining order is out of bounds should cancel each other out and allow WDFW to do their job, and also do what was approved within the Wolf Management Plan.

I hope that this King County judge faces disciplinary action for this restraining order, once it is deemed inappropriate, and loses his job.  Judges are supposed to interpret and apply existing laws, the killing of a wolf per an approved management plan doesn't break, or even bend, any existing law.

I also wish WDFW had their own lawyers to do the above, every time some group decides to sue WDFW and keep them from doing their job.
It's a temporary restraining order meaning everything is frozen until they can have a full hearing on the 28th. I doubt any judge would intervene.
Bruce Vandervort

Offline brokentrail

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 568
  • Location: Graham, WA
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 03:53:34 PM »
I, myself, would like to see The Sportsmans Alliance, or any other group, in turn, go get the restraining order over-ruled and allow WDFW proceed.  One judge providing a restraining order and one judge saying the restraining order is out of bounds should cancel each other out and allow WDFW to do their job, and also do what was approved within the Wolf Management Plan.

I hope that this King County judge faces disciplinary action for this restraining order, once it is deemed inappropriate, and loses his job.  Judges are supposed to interpret and apply existing laws, the killing of a wolf per an approved management plan doesn't break, or even bend, any existing law.

I also wish WDFW had their own lawyers to do the above, every time some group decides to sue WDFW and keep them from doing their job.
It's a temporary restraining order meaning everything is frozen until they can have a full hearing on the 28th. I doubt any judge would intervene.

Yea,  I don't doubt that at all,  I just wish that wasn't the case.

Offline Houndhunter

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 3026
  • Location: Continental Divide
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #10 on: Yesterday at 04:00:31 PM »
Judges holding up all kinds of things these days...

Online highcountry_hunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2010
  • Posts: 725
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #11 on: Today at 09:41:26 PM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

The largest cattle producer in NE WA, who has suffered more cattle loss than any other producer in the state, refuses to accept a dollar from wdfw for depredations

Offline Boss .300 winmag

  • FLY NAVAL AVIATION
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 19155
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • How do you measure trying, you do, or you don’t.
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #12 on: Today at 09:44:03 PM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

The largest cattle producer in NE WA, who has suffered more cattle loss than any other producer in the state, refuses to accept a dollar from wdfw for depredations

Who would that be?
"Just because I like granola, and I have stretched my arms around a few trees, doesn't mean I'm a tree hugger!
Hi I'm 8156, our leader is Bearpaw.
YOU CANNOT REASON WITH A TIGER WHEN YOUR HEAD IS IN ITS MOUTH! Winston Churchill

Keep Calm And Duc/Ski Doo On!

Online Dan-o

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 18404
Re: Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal
« Reply #13 on: Today at 09:48:27 PM »
Check the wolf budget at WDFW, $1.6 million recently, less than $140,000 paid out for dead livestock.  Major cluster

The largest cattle producer in NE WA, who has suffered more cattle loss than any other producer in the state, refuses to accept a dollar from wdfw for depredations

Do you know why he won't accept any of their money?
Member:   Yakstrakgutp (or whatever we are)
I love the BFRO!!!
I wonder how many people will touch their nose to their screen trying to read this...

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Weatherby Vanguard vs. Browning x bolt by zwickeyman
[Today at 10:07:12 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by Dan-o
[Today at 09:48:27 PM]


GMU 368 Nasty Creek Rd Access (Gate) by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 09:36:40 PM]


FS Surbu BFG 50 by Tacticalhammer
[Today at 09:36:18 PM]


Pack wheel by millerwheeler
[Today at 09:26:47 PM]


E WA waterfowl guide by 92xj
[Today at 09:13:44 PM]


Where do the bulls go? by TeacherMan
[Today at 09:04:39 PM]


Anyone use game carts? by bigdub257
[Today at 08:55:58 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Today at 08:55:31 PM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by kramman
[Today at 08:51:05 PM]


Mushroom ID Thread by MLHSN
[Today at 08:50:05 PM]


No upland with dog during deer and elk season? by buglebuster
[Today at 08:22:23 PM]


Let’s see ur heavy pack out pics by ganghis
[Today at 07:11:45 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by swanderek
[Today at 07:01:53 PM]


West side antler buyers by trophyhunt
[Today at 06:18:29 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by bigmacc
[Today at 03:45:16 PM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by Gonehuntin01
[Today at 03:23:04 PM]


My new BB Gun by JDHasty
[Today at 02:41:00 PM]


Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 02:11:14 PM]


Supreme Court Declines to Hear Corner-Crossing Case by Tbar
[Today at 01:43:14 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal