Ruger M77 issues

[Rgrady35]

I'm in the market for a 7mm Rem Mag.  A co worker has a older M77 tang safety he was thinking about selling.  I understand that before '92 Ruger was buying blanks from different venders and as a result there were accuracy issues with some rifles.  The gun is indecent shape, a few dings and it needs a good cleaning.  It has a old Redfield scope on it.  I'm not sure of the magnification.  I'll probably put another scope on it.  I've offered him 250.00 for it.  He said he would think it over.  I'm asking for some advise.  I really am not certain that I would even go to 300.00 for it.  I hate to let a good deal go though.  Some input would be greatly appreciated.

[jackelope]

shoot it first.
see how she shoots, they're good rifles. i think huntnphool uses a 7mag m77.

[Woodchuck]

i have an old m77 .338wm, bought new in 89? accuracy has never been an issue, gun will shoot way better than its handler. i will say this, it does break stocks, i shoot primarily factory loads and have shot some mild handloads. every 3rd or 4th year i have to ship it to ruger and get it replaced, they never charge a dime all it costs me is freight there, love that gun

[6x6in6]

I've got a '84 M77 in 7 mag.
It's the most consistent shooting one of my 4 M77's.  Not that any of them I would say is incosistent.  It's the only one with the tang safety.
If not already done so, make sure it has the accidental firing screw fix done or do it yourself.  Contact Ruger with S/N of the gun and they will verify if it qualifies and/or been done.

[JackOfAllTrades]

I love my tang safety Ruger77 from the late 80's. (Originally in .300winmag, now chambered for .30-338) Accuracy is NOT an issue.

And... The pre-MKII can accept the Ruger77 varminters trigger. -As good or better than a Timney! In fact, many of the magnum rifles came with them.

As for breaking stocks, I've never heard of that. Mine is pillar/glass bedded/free floated factory piece of wood, and although there's a little crack in the end of the foregrip from me falling down a cliff with it in my hand, I've never heard of Ruger 77's being hard on stocks. I don't shoot whimpy little loads either.

-Steve

[jdb]

buy it.

[Woodchuck]

it is the only one i know of, but looks like brand new every few years so i dont gripe too loud, and jdb is right, buy it

[Rgrady35]

Ya'll got me convinced. I'm gonna offer 300.00, I hope he'll bite...it's all the cash I have right now.  Wish me luck.

[testar77]

Ya'll got me convinced. I'm gonna offer 300.00, I hope he'll bite...it's all the cash I have right now.  Wish me luck.

Has he turned down your first offer of $250 yet???

[jackelope]

wait for him to decline the 250 offer....

[JackOfAllTrades]

Then if he does, only offer $275!  Damn man, you wanna 'give' ALL your money away? Barter! Barter! Barter!

-Steve

[testar77]

Then if he does, only offer $275!  Damn man, you wanna 'give' ALL your money away? Barter! Barter! Barter!

-Steve

 

[Straight Shooter]

I have one in .308.  Originally, it was .22-250, but my dad (retired Navy Gunner's Mate) had a .30 caliber machine gun barrel turned-down and installed back in the 80's.  Sweet shooter (more accurate than my newer stainless Mark II... also .308).  The only thing I don't like about Rugers is the scope rings (very solid, but I hate having to replace them... harder to come by and more pricey than Weaver-type).  Ruger's customer service is great!  The Redfield should be Japanese-made, so it may be worth taking a closer look.

[MountainWalk]

I own the tang saftey and wing saftey versions of the model 77. They are both great rifles. The tang model, in my opinion has a better trigger. Both have the good bedding system. The rifle your talking about prolly has a hump along fore arm barrel channel. Most give pretty reliable accuracy. If it doesnt, its a simple matter to float it. Most don't need this. My tang model 77 in 220 swift is an excellant shooter as is. It can put 15 shots into three inches at two hundred yards.

In short, buy it.

[Dakota Dogman]

Have one in 7x57 which I love; great rifle.

Only concern is that the tang safety has caused "non-intentional fires" a couple (2 in 25 years) of times.  Seems to be a combination of trying to pull the trigger hard with the safety on, and then trying to take the safety off at a later time.  I guess there was a recall somewhere along the line or some such thing to adjust something. 

Don't know, not worried about it either as the rifle has been great & killed a bit of all its been asked to.

God Bless,