collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: 243?  (Read 35639 times)

Offline splitshot

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 2054
243?
« on: February 08, 2011, 11:04:32 AM »
several questions.  is a 243 good enough to kill a large buck deer?  is there much difference in a 243 and say a 25-06,260 rem, 6 mm. or a 257?  i will be getting a deer rifle soon and want some expert opinions.  i had a 243 but my grand daughter wanted it so thats why i am looking.  thanks,  mike w

Offline Woodchuck

  • GO TEAM!!!
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Explorer
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 12143
  • Location: Walla Walla
  • HuntWA Woodblock
Re: 243?
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2011, 11:09:19 AM »
.243 will kill just about anything, just need to be sure of shot placement and use a quality bullet  :twocents:
Antlered rabbit tastes like chicken


Inuendo, wasn't he an Italian proctoligist?

Offline fishermanjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 556
  • Location: WetSide
Re: 243?
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2011, 11:12:16 AM »
My first deer rifle was a .243. I have dumped deer with it on more than one occasion. As long as there is good shot placement you can get it done.

Offline 7mag.

  • Blacktail Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 2968
  • Location: Buckley
  • YAR member
Re: 243?
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2011, 11:22:43 AM »
A .243 is a great deer cartridge, as are all of the cartridges you mentioned. The .243 is also a great varmint round as well.
Semper Fi. USMC

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50175
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: 243?
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2011, 11:27:54 AM »
shot placement.
A .223 will kill a deer, so will a .22LR if you hit them in the right place.
 :twocents:
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline 7mag.

  • Blacktail Hunter
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 2968
  • Location: Buckley
  • YAR member
Re: 243?
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2011, 11:34:11 AM »
shot placement.
A .223 will kill a deer, so will a .22LR if you hit them in the right place.
 :twocents:

That's right. There are several states that allow deer hunting with a .22 cal. centerfire's.
Semper Fi. USMC

Offline Birdguy

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3865
Re: 243?
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2011, 09:06:36 PM »
As stated shot placement is key. A bad shot form a big caliber may not kill a deer, but a good shot from a small gun will do it just fine. That being said I am no expert, shot distance, comfort level of the shooter with the gun, bullet weight and make up, and several other factors all play a role in success regardless of caliber. I am certain there are several folks on here that will have other thoughts and knowledge to help you decide.

Offline 300UltraMagShooter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1408
Re: 243?
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2011, 09:14:26 PM »
If it is all about shot placement, why don't we see people using .243s brown bear hunting?

I'm serious and not being smart....  I've asked this type question 50 times and havn't got an answer that I'm satisfied with yet.

I love shooting my 300 ultra so doubt I'll change anytime soon...  but it isn't the best brush gun I'll have to admit.

Offline danceswitharrows

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 525
  • Location: Auburn
Re: 243?
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2011, 09:20:46 PM »
You will find that bear faster if it was a vitals shot from a 243 over a gut shot 300ultramag  8)
Marines do it better

Offline hoyt2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 620
  • Location: kennewick
Re: 243?
« Reply #9 on: February 08, 2011, 09:22:34 PM »
A 243 will kill an elk but why use that when there are better elk guns out there. There are tons of opinion's on what makes a good elk gun and there all different. So here is mine. A 243 is a deer gun I believe elk should be hunted with larger bullets 30 cal or better. I'm sure someone will come along and tell me I'm wrong. Like I said it's my opinion. Have fun picking out your next rifle.

Offline cascademountainhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 777
  • Location: Cascade Mountains
Re: 243?
« Reply #10 on: February 08, 2011, 09:40:49 PM »
Ive used a .243 and deer before. It has always done good for me. I also like how its doesnt ruin as much meat as bigger calibers will.

Offline hoyt2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 620
  • Location: kennewick
Re: 243?
« Reply #11 on: February 08, 2011, 09:51:16 PM »
boy I didn't read that good. I don't know were i got elk from. Anyways a 243 is a good deer gun. I don't see a big difference in a 2506 257 and the 243 there all good deer guns. the only difference would be fps. I've never had any of those guns but my friends shoot them and take nice animals with them. 

Offline MichaelD

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 334
  • Location: Prosser WA
Re: 243?
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2011, 09:53:03 PM »
My dad, brother and I have put a lot of deer in the freezer over the years using a .243 and 6mm.   :chuckle: Soon my kids will be taking over duties of the 6mm and my nephews will take over duty on the ol' .243 for a new generation of freezer fillers.   :IBCOOL:

Offline 6x6in6

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3593
  • Location: Bellingham, WA
Re: 243?
« Reply #13 on: February 08, 2011, 09:55:21 PM »
Dad's dropped an awful lot of deer in Montana over his years with his 257AI

Offline bobcat

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 39181
  • Location: Rochester
    • robert68
Re: 243?
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2011, 09:59:59 PM »
There is nothing wrong with the 243, but if you're going to buy a new rifle, I would suggest getting something just a bit bigger. The 25-06 and 260 that you mentioned would be fine, or step it up just a little more and get a 308 or 270.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Hoof Rot by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 11:01:20 PM]


Ever win the WDFW Big Game Raffle? by addicted1
[Yesterday at 10:56:29 PM]


Honda BF15A Outboard Problems by Sandberm
[Yesterday at 08:18:08 PM]


Idaho General Season Going to Draw for Nonresidents by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 08:16:36 PM]


Eastern WA-WT hunting from tree stands?? by addicted1
[Yesterday at 06:47:44 PM]


A question for any FFL holders on here by ryan2202
[Yesterday at 05:01:26 PM]


MA-10 Coho by CP
[Yesterday at 04:14:05 PM]


Bow mount trolling motors by BigGoonTuna
[Yesterday at 01:29:55 PM]


I’m on a blacktail mission by addicted1
[Yesterday at 12:10:11 PM]


where is everyone? by nwwanderer
[Yesterday at 06:01:04 AM]


Wolf documentary PBS by Skyvalhunter
[Yesterday at 05:58:56 AM]


Stuffed Pork Chop by EnglishSetter
[June 07, 2025, 11:12:59 PM]


Another great day in the turkey woods. by Remington Outdoors
[June 07, 2025, 09:43:57 PM]


Buck age by kentrek
[June 07, 2025, 08:56:47 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Judespapa
[June 07, 2025, 08:37:07 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal