collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?  (Read 25963 times)

Offline arguhl

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 11
Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« on: May 04, 2012, 03:54:07 PM »
Im going to be buying a new pack in the next couple weeks and I need some input from fellow hunters. I'm looking at the Opw whole shabang or the kifaru duplex
Timberline 2. Both have there pros and cons, price and weight being the biggest two factors. The Opw weighs in at almost ten pounds which is heavy to say the least , the kifaru just under three pounds, that six pound difference is huge in my book. The cons for the kifaru, the price tag which is well a lot to say the least. I love the diversity of the opw but also take into consideration the more parts in a system the more points for potential failure. This is important considering my uncanny ability to take any piece of Gear and destory it with use. I've read the majority of reviews on both that are available just looking for some more opinions and or thoughts from guys that have used these packs hard in the field. I'm interested in the field reports not just impression from handling the pAck at a show. Thanks so much Andrew
« Last Edit: May 05, 2012, 12:51:08 PM by arguhl »

Offline MtnMuley

  • Site Sponsor
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 8635
  • Location: NCW
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2012, 04:13:03 PM »
Never used the OPW, but will say you won't be disappointed in the Kifaru.

Offline couesbitten

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 1393
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2012, 07:58:58 AM »
Never used either one, but there's a reason that Kifaru is so popular.
With the catching ends the pleasure of the chase. - Abraham Lincoln

Offline JPhelps

  • I EAT ELK!!!
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 2866
  • Location: Pe Ell
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2012, 08:07:35 AM »
If you have the $$$, Kifaru is hard to beat.

I found a used Dana Designs Terraframe Longbed XL (external framed load monster) and can't be happier.  Might be worth looking into.  Last year I packed 160+ lbs for over 10 miles and I couldn't have asked for anything more (except less weight) :tup:

Offline arguhl

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 11
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2012, 12:53:10 PM »
I want to correct my statement about the kifaru pack with the frame it weighs six pounds. The timberline d2 is super appealing because you can switch the bags that attach to the frame. Very slick for sure and the frame appears heavy duty

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3580
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2012, 12:56:30 PM »
I recently ordered a kifaru duplex t2 (5200) with the cargo panel and a few other extras, but havent put my hands on it yet so I cant personally vouch for it, although did extensive research on numerous packs and decided on kifaru. One thing I can recomend is- that if you want a duplex or any kifaru pack you had better get it ordered, mine is already gunna be a little late for some of my scouting trips this year (expected shiping date is late july :yike:). Good luck......Josh
Go hawks

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3379
  • Location: west coast
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2012, 01:03:07 PM »
six pounds  :yike:...my shelter,sleeping bag,stove,raingear,sleeping pad,and a days worth of food weighs in at six pounds..never used the kifaru but i would never buy a pack over 3 pounds,realy no reason to pack that extra weight  :twocents:

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3580
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #7 on: May 05, 2012, 01:06:45 PM »
good luck finding a solid pack capable of carrying out 100 lbs of meat and gear that weighs 3lbs, these arent day packs by the way
Go hawks

Offline JPhelps

  • I EAT ELK!!!
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 2866
  • Location: Pe Ell
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #8 on: May 05, 2012, 01:15:24 PM »
 :yeah:

Show me a sub 3 lb pack that can haul 100+ lbs and carry 7+ days worth of gear and I am all ears.

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3379
  • Location: west coast
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #9 on: May 05, 2012, 01:23:01 PM »
good luck finding a solid pack capable of carrying out 100 lbs of meat and gear that weighs 3lbs, these arent day packs by the way

haha they are out there,my frame is spot on 3 pounds and has noooo prob carying 100 pound loads. its just one of those plastic style military frames(same frame the wilderness pack uses) with a 35liter dry sack on it.nothing fancey,no pockets,no extra gizmos.no extra weight
il try and find a pic but i think you get the idea
« Last Edit: May 05, 2012, 01:33:06 PM by kentrek »

Offline romaknows

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 348
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #10 on: May 05, 2012, 01:33:43 PM »
KU 5200 :tup:
high country rules!

Offline lewy

  • Forum Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 3580
  • Location: buckley
  • IBEW RMEF WSTA WCO NRA
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #11 on: May 05, 2012, 01:34:52 PM »
good luck finding a solid pack capable of carrying out 100 lbs of meat and gear that weighs 3lbs, these arent day packs by the way

haha they are out there,my frame is spot on 3 pounds and has noooo prob carying 100 pound loads. its just one of those plastic style military frames(same frame the wilderness pack uses) with a 35liter dry sack on it.nothing fancey,no pockets,no extra gizmos.no extra weight
il try and find a pic but i think you get the idea

thats not apples to apples, im talking frame and pack both. going with just a frame is a good option to save weight no doubt, but doesnt suit the needs of everyone....
Go hawks

Offline JPhelps

  • I EAT ELK!!!
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 2866
  • Location: Pe Ell
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #12 on: May 05, 2012, 01:38:14 PM »
romaknows - That's the ONLY "pack".  Then the question of durability comes up.  I think the Kifaru Timberline is the best balance of Weight/Ruggedness.

Offline Alpine Mojo

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2008
  • Posts: 640
  • Location: Holding out in King County
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #13 on: May 05, 2012, 02:32:42 PM »
yup, KU5200
Friend: "Are you free tonight?"
Me:  (Gazing into the distance as a bald eagle screeches)  "I'm always free"

Offline kentrek

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 3379
  • Location: west coast
Re: Oregon pack works or kifaru ?
« Reply #14 on: May 05, 2012, 03:11:39 PM »
good luck finding a solid pack capable of carrying out 100 lbs of meat and gear that weighs 3lbs, these arent day packs by the way

haha they are out there,my frame is spot on 3 pounds and has noooo prob carying 100 pound loads. its just one of those plastic style military frames(same frame the wilderness pack uses) with a 35liter dry sack on it.nothing fancey,no pockets,no extra gizmos.no extra weight
il try and find a pic but i think you get the idea

thats not apples to apples, im talking frame and pack both. going with just a frame is a good option to save weight no doubt, but doesnt suit the needs of everyone....

 my main point is i would just go for the lighter pack, i have no idea of the "needs" or wants of arguhl or other peaple on here.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by jrebel
[Today at 06:27:01 AM]


Let’s see your best Washington buck by HntnFsh
[Today at 05:33:38 AM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by actionshooter
[Yesterday at 09:43:51 PM]


Walked a cougar down by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 08:31:53 PM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]


1x scopes vs open sights by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 07:29:35 PM]


Long Beach Clamming Tides by Encore 280
[Yesterday at 05:16:00 PM]


WTS Suppressors I Can Get by dreadi
[Yesterday at 03:30:33 PM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by Longfield1
[Yesterday at 03:27:51 PM]


Straight on by kentrek
[Yesterday at 03:04:53 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal