collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Fish conservation  (Read 2957 times)

Offline 2pt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 28
  • Location: snohomsh
Fish conservation
« on: August 16, 2012, 10:24:41 PM »
Just a quick thought  replies welcome

If our Indian tribes are guaranteed 50% of Washington States fish shouldn't they be responsible for 50% of the conservation efforts?

FYI I'm reading a Seattle Weekly article about tribal issues in the skagit valley




Offline 2pt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 28
  • Location: snohomsh
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #1 on: August 16, 2012, 10:27:40 PM »
I don't know how much they contribute so that's one disclaimer? Anybody know figures? Do they pay for hatcheries? Stock lakes? Im not sure what the difference is in the amount of money they pay total and what the state pays total????

Offline wraithen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2041
  • Location: JBLMish
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #2 on: August 16, 2012, 10:29:02 PM »
They do far more than most people realize, they just don't advertise it.
the head has been lopped of the eagle.our country has become a nation of losers,them that feed on the teet and can do no more than suckle from them that toil. ~ Rasbo

Offline 2pt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 28
  • Location: snohomsh
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #3 on: August 16, 2012, 10:34:37 PM »
I know they do a lot of habitat studies and fish counts but it seems like they are more concerned with native fish. I just think maybe they benefit more from the efforts of the WDFW??? I don't know, it's a tough issue

Offline 2pt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 28
  • Location: snohomsh
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #4 on: August 16, 2012, 10:37:58 PM »
Also this article is a must read for any sport fisherman in Washington.

Offline PlateauNDN

  • Y.A.R. Medicine Man
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 10691
  • Location: God's Country
  • R.I.P. Colockumelk 20130423. Semper Fi!
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #5 on: August 16, 2012, 10:59:37 PM »
You can research on the net for more info. In regards to the topic or just search on here its been brought up more times than I at least can recall.  Tribes do a lot but are not public about it and a lot of tribes fund and operate hatcheries. Whether owned by tribes or other entities.  There's a lot of info. If you look, CMR.I.T.F.C. Is for treaty Tribes on the Columbia and NW Fish Commission is for all westside tribes. :tup:
If you can read thank a teacher, If you can read in English thank a Marine! 
Not as Lean, Just as Mean, Still a Marine!
He who shed blood with me shall forever be my brother!

"Around this camp, there's only one Chief; the rest are Indians!"

"Give me 15 more minutes, I was dreaming of Beavers!"

Offline Dhoey07

  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 3350
  • Location: Parts Unknown
    • No Facebook for this guy
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #6 on: August 17, 2012, 09:58:09 AM »
The new hatchery going in at Wells is half indian half state I believe  :dunno:

Offline 2pt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2010
  • Posts: 28
  • Location: snohomsh
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #7 on: August 17, 2012, 08:02:42 PM »
Thanks for the replies I'll do some more research on the web

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2012, 08:41:50 PM »
Just a quick thought  replies welcome

If our Indian tribes are guaranteed 50% of Washington States fish shouldn't they be responsible for 50% of the conservation efforts?

FYI I'm reading a Seattle Weekly article about tribal issues in the skagit valley
if by conservation do you mean farmed fish ie hatcheries?  or do you mean dam removal? or restoration of streambeds?  never quite sure what people are talking about when discussing this....

for what its worth the state got out of the fish farming business for the most part, they found it costing more than the rewards ie they lost money :)....so most hatcheries are now run by tribes or private individuals/groups...

Offline PlateauNDN

  • Y.A.R. Medicine Man
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 10691
  • Location: God's Country
  • R.I.P. Colockumelk 20130423. Semper Fi!
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2012, 01:47:56 PM »
2pt, I just read this article thought you might like it. :tup:

Squaxin Island Tribe makes sure state hatchery can release chinook
Aug 23rd, 2012 • Category: News

The Squaxin Island Tribe recently intervened and contributed $72,000 to prevent a 75 percent cut in chinook production at the state’s salmon hatchery in Tumwater.
 
“If the tribe hadn’t been able to help the state, only one million chinook would’ve been released,” said Jeff Dickison, assistant natural resources director for the tribe. Production at the Deschutes River facility has been steady at 4 million chinook, but because of a shortfall in legislative funding, production would have crashed to 1 million. Production has been as high as 12 million fall chinook salmon at the facility since the program began in the 1950s.
 
Chinook from the Deschutes contribute to fisheries throughout the region. “This chinook run, at the far southern head of Puget Sound, is incredibly important because these fish are caught everywhere from Alaska to Budd Inlet,” said Joe Peters, harvest biologist for the tribe. “And, actually, the vast majority of these fish are caught in sport fisheries between Everett and Tacoma.”
 
The run’s contribution to fisheries and the local culture comes despite of limitations it faces to find good habitat. “Almost as soon as these fish leave for the ocean, they enter an incredibly degraded estuary,” Dickison said. So-called Capitol Lake and the alterations of lower Budd Inlet make for extremely poor marine transition conditions. This is where salmon smolt as they adapt to salt water.
 
A shrinking state budget over the last few years has put pressure on natural resources agencies, especially on salmon hatchery production. “The money the state spends on DFW is less than one percent of the entire state budget and has shrunk over the last decade,” Dickison said. Since 2001 the portion of the state budget spent on DFW has shrunk from .68 percent to .56 percent.
 
“The tribe had to jump in at the last minute to save these fish,” Dickison said. “The decision from the legislature to cut funding didn’t give us much time to consider what to do with production on the Deschutes.”
 
“The tribe is interested in making sure our treaty right to harvest salmon is preserved. These chinook are an important part of our fishing culture and economy,” Andy Whitener, tribal Natural Resources Director said. “Fishing on these salmon is important to the tribe and to non-tribal sport fishermen, too. We’re glad everyone will be able to fish on this run.”
 
(END)
 
For more information, contact: Andy Whitener, natural resources director, Squaxin Island Tribe, (360) 432-3809. Jeff Dickison, assistant natural resources director, Squaxin Island Tribe, (360) 432-3815. Emmett O’Connell, information officer, NWIFC, (360) 528-4304, eoconnell@nwifc.org


Here's some more info. for you to check out.

http://nwifc.org/2012/06/nwifc-magazine-tribes-keep-hatchery-programs-running/
If you can read thank a teacher, If you can read in English thank a Marine! 
Not as Lean, Just as Mean, Still a Marine!
He who shed blood with me shall forever be my brother!

"Around this camp, there's only one Chief; the rest are Indians!"

"Give me 15 more minutes, I was dreaming of Beavers!"

Offline HUNTINCOUPLE

  • Lost Somewhere on the Praire of Klickitat Co. Chasing The Elusive BENCHLEG DEERS.
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 8146
  • Location: Lyle WA, 98635
  • Yep, my avatar is from my front porch. #2835
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #10 on: August 24, 2012, 01:58:45 PM »
Very good read. Thanks for posting! :tup:
Slap some bacon on a biscut and lets go, were burrnin daylight!

Most peoples health is a decision not a condition?

Kill your television!  ICEMAN SAID TO!

Life Member of Hunting  Washington  Forum.

Time in the woods is more important than timing the moon.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25041
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #11 on: August 24, 2012, 03:12:35 PM »
2pt, can you share a link? or is it on paper?
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: Fish conservation
« Reply #12 on: August 24, 2012, 03:44:47 PM »
If the treaty obligations didn't exist, the FCRPS would probably not spend much on non-listed Columbia river salmon and steelhead.  Most of what the feds do for Columbia River hatchery production, is driven by their treaty tribe obligations.  There would be far fewer hatcheries w/o the treaties, even if the tribes aren't actually paying the funding.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

MA 6 EAST fishing report? by washingtonmuley
[Today at 11:56:01 AM]


I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo by highside74
[Today at 11:07:49 AM]


Kings by Gentrys
[Today at 11:05:40 AM]


49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose by vandeman17
[Today at 10:45:30 AM]


Nevada bull hunt 2025 by High Climber
[Today at 10:32:52 AM]


2025 Crab! by ghosthunter
[Today at 09:43:49 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 09:26:43 AM]


Survey in ? by hdshot
[Today at 09:20:27 AM]


Bear behavior by brew
[Today at 08:40:20 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by bearpaw
[Today at 07:57:12 AM]


A lonely Job... by Loup Loup
[Today at 07:47:41 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by bear
[Today at 06:06:48 AM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Today at 05:27:26 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:42:07 PM]


Toutle Quality Bull - Rifle by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:09:14 PM]


MA-10 Coho by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 02:08:31 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 01:52:01 PM]


Blue Mtn Foothills West Rifle Tag by Trooper
[Yesterday at 01:18:40 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Dave Workman
[Yesterday at 01:01:22 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal