collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Poll: Binoculars Style  (Read 10421 times)

Offline swanny

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 1852
  • Location: Kent
    • 9to5active
Re: Poll: Binoculars Style
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2009, 09:49:47 AM »
Alpen Shasta Ridge 8x42's. Great glass for less money!

Offline ZRS-8x42

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 291
  • Location: Portland
    • Zen-Ray Optics
Re: Poll: Binoculars Style
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2009, 10:10:39 AM »
Charles,

Interesting comment about focal length and ED glass.  I had it pretty much in my head that the lower magnification of the typical hand held binocular received less benefit from ED glass than the higher power of the more typical spotting scope.  In other words, what I had always heard was that the ED glass benefit occurred with increase in magnification.  I wonder if you could comment a little further there?  I'm much more of a binocular guy and prefer a relatively higher power binocular on a tripod when I want to look long.  Less strain on my eyes and I can see better with a 12x+ tripod mounted binocular than I can from 25x spotting scope.

As to the poll, I have and use all of the types, so there is no good answer for me.  However I have come to really like the full size roof prism with open bridge, like the ZEN ED (and others) and have always liked mid sized porros like the Yosemite.  I have a wish for a dream roof prism binocular in 7x35, with ED glass and about an 8.5* fov.  I have a Swift Eaglet 7x36 which is really close to the ideal, but not quite.

Steve, Welcome to Hunting-WA!

There are two focal lengths (one for objective lens group, the other is for ocular lens group).  To support 20x magnification power, a long objective focal length is required. It is much easier for light to converge with longer focal length optics (less aberration).  However, when the light travel through ocular lens group with short focal length, the color abberation will get worse. The higher the magnification, the shorter the ocular focal length, the worse the color abberation gets. So your comment about higher magnification is absolutely accurate.

One reason you might feel eye strain from spotting scope is probably because it is not comfortable to view through one eyepiece vs two through binoculars. I have used some high quality 25x100 binoculars. They are as comfortable as the ZEN ED.

 

Offline Steve C

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 112
  • Location: Yakima Valley, WA/Klamath Basin, OR
Re: Poll: Binoculars Style
« Reply #17 on: January 15, 2009, 12:52:54 PM »
Steve, Welcome to Hunting-WA!

There are two focal lengths (one for objective lens group, the other is for ocular lens group).  To support 20x magnification power, a long objective focal length is required. It is much easier for light to converge with longer focal length optics (less aberration).  However, when the light travel through ocular lens group with short focal length, the color aberration will get worse. The higher the magnification, the shorter the ocular focal length, the worse the color aberration gets. So your comment about higher magnification is absolutely accurate.

One reason you might feel eye strain from spotting scope is probably because it is not comfortable to view through one eyepiece vs two through binoculars. I have used some high quality 25x100 binoculars. They are as comfortable as the ZEN ED.
 

Thanks for the focal length and magnification comment.  I should have had that figured out.

Also, you are right about the tripod mounted binoculars.   Using two eyes is less stressing than using one, and that is a large reason I prefer the binoculars.  Another equally large reason for me is the fact that a 12-15x binocular handles heat mirage a whole lot better than the 25-60x range of typical spotters.
Steve

Theodore Roosevelt:  "Do what you can where you are with what you have."

Offline blindpig

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 2524
  • Location: Western WA
Re: Poll: Binoculars Style
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2009, 01:30:41 PM »
10x42's for me.

Offline ZRS-8x42

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 291
  • Location: Portland
    • Zen-Ray Optics
Re: Poll: Binoculars Style
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2009, 09:40:16 AM »
10x42's for me.

Maybe I should start a size/magnification poll too.  :)

Offline Coyote Control

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 10
  • Location: Mt. Vernon, WA
Re: Poll: Binoculars Style
« Reply #20 on: February 26, 2009, 11:08:44 PM »
These are what I use now - don't know how much longer I will have them, seems my son has his eye on the Geovid. But the 10x50 Leica I will keep until "death do us apart"!!
The 10x50 are truly a good pair of optics, a little heavy, but very tough......



Larry

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Best/Preferred Scouting App by Kascade_Killer
[Today at 12:50:28 AM]


Last year putting in… by wa.hunter
[Yesterday at 11:21:43 PM]


Desert Sheds by Dan-o
[Yesterday at 09:54:46 PM]


Search underway for three missing people after boat sinks near Mukilteo by Stein
[Yesterday at 09:30:24 PM]


Anybody breeding meat rabbit? by jackelope
[Yesterday at 09:22:04 PM]


Sportsman’s Muzzloader Selection by VickGar
[Yesterday at 09:20:43 PM]


Vantage Bridge by jackelope
[Yesterday at 08:03:05 PM]


wyoming pronghorn draw by 87Ford
[Yesterday at 07:35:40 PM]


Nevada Results by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 05:13:20 PM]


Wyoming elk who's in? by go4steelhd
[Yesterday at 03:25:16 PM]


New to ML-Optics help by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 02:55:25 PM]


Survey in ? by metlhead
[Yesterday at 01:42:41 PM]


F250 or Silverado 2500? by 7mmfan
[Yesterday at 01:39:14 PM]


Is FS70 open? by yajsab
[Yesterday at 10:13:07 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal