collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Tamron 70-300 vs Canon L?  (Read 2895 times)

Offline Smokepole

  • Kevin Miller
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 2336
  • Location: Upper Skyberian
Re: Tamron 70-300 vs Canon L?
« Reply #15 on: June 11, 2013, 04:48:31 PM »
Over on 24 hr campfire in the photography section is a Tamron Rep. No need to ask him about len's, he will recommend a Tamron. But dig through and find some of his photo's, terrific. I think how much you plan on shooting with a len's should help figure out what one you get. Then your own skill level. Take someone like me and I take photo's I like to look at and tech things in the photo I seldom see. A nice photo to me is a nice photo. I can't see the things in a photo well enough to get critical with a photo. A high dollar lense would probably be wasted on me. So would it on you? I have a 55-300 Nikon lens, not high dollar at all and I have a 70-300 Sigma, again even less of a high dollar lense.Both take photo's that satisfy me. What I do have a pretty good grasp on is the difference between $350 and $1000! Most pro's say go with the camera manufacturer's len's and usually the more they are, the better they like them. Seem's that most really good photographer's chase that elusive perfect photo but most everything I look at of their's is perfect. Even if you do it for money, how perfect does the photo need to be? The things that one guy doesn't like about a photo, a really good photographer tears apart and 98% of the rest of the people think it's great. Most people thing a good photo is only made by a good camera; the old "You must have a camera" ploy we all like to hear.

You can invest a lot of money into lense's that take better photo's than you do or you can spend a lot less on a like lense from an after market maker that takes photo's most people think are great. With the difference you can buy another good lense.

I have sold rights to many photos over the years.  If you sell photos, they need to absolutely perfect.  Stock photography is inspected thoroughly before it is accepted into a stock library.  It is zoomed up to 100% and if there is noise, motion blur, purple fringing, lens blur -- it gets rejected.  A lot of us have worked hard to improve our photography throughout our adult lives, from film to the new digital format.  It takes a really good lens to take really good shots. 

It would behoove any ambitious photographer -- who enjoys learning, and seeing himself grow as an artist -- to buy the finest lenses he can afford.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Tamron 70-300 vs Canon L?
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2013, 05:11:39 PM »
Everyone gets tempted and makes the 3rd party lens mistake at some time (I have done it).  There are some that are good values and about equal the name brand, such as a sigma macro lens.  There is an ok sigma 50mm lens.  By and large, they are inferior and eventually, if your photography progresses, you'll learn to hate the limitations of the lens.  An f5.6 lens indoors isn't very useful whether Canon or not.  Having that extra stop or two would be handy.  If you don't need the reach, a 70-200 in the f2.8 flavor seems more suitable...
Wouldn't expect a better explanation than this.   

I bought 3rd party lens because that was really all I could afford on a high schoolers budget, but I have long since used them, even if they seemed like good glass.  They just don't compare.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Today at 07:10:20 AM]


2025 Draw Results by Elkaholic daWg
[Today at 07:02:27 AM]


Son drawn - Silver Dollar Youth Any Elk - Help? by Rugergunsite308
[Today at 06:27:17 AM]


Bow mount trolling motors by CP
[Today at 06:03:13 AM]


SE raffle tags holder by HntnFsh
[Today at 05:39:57 AM]


11th Annual 'Pull For Scouting' Clay Crushing Classic by high_hunter
[Today at 12:27:18 AM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by high_hunter
[Today at 12:21:33 AM]


Ritzville Rifle Buck - GMU 284 by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 11:49:16 PM]


Antlerless Moose more than once? by shootem
[Yesterday at 11:25:51 PM]


Nooksack Muzzleloader Bull Tag by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:42:24 PM]


My wife drew quality deer DESERT rifle 10/18-10/26!!!!! by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 10:17:15 PM]


Palouse buck deer by blumtnelkndeer
[Yesterday at 10:14:00 PM]


Drew Quality by Jimmer
[Yesterday at 09:34:00 PM]


Nevada guide draw Mule Deer by Beastmonger1987
[Yesterday at 09:33:34 PM]


Quality Swakane by Rainier10
[Yesterday at 09:09:17 PM]


Observatory quality bull rifle by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 09:00:02 PM]


Anterless 1334 muzzle loader by Bdawg
[Yesterday at 08:46:31 PM]


A little Martini Cadet varmint rifle I have been working on by JDHasty
[Yesterday at 08:43:33 PM]


Pogue Quality by geauxtigers
[Yesterday at 08:38:35 PM]


2025 OILS! by HUNTNORTHWEST
[Yesterday at 07:46:27 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal