Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: bobcat on October 14, 2014, 10:55:09 AMKF, yes I would say it was stupid, and I bet the guy who did it is thinking the same thing about now. Unless he just enjoys giving thousands of dollars to attorneys and a substantial amount in the form of fines to the government. But then I don't know the guy, maybe he's got millions of dollars laying around and nothing better to do with it than try to test the waters and see how serious the state is when you kill an animal that's listed on the endangered species list. I'd say he was honest to a fault. If being honest and telling WDFW he shot a wolf that was threatening his livestock under the 'caught in the act' rule is stupid.......hmmm I see your point Bobcat. touche
KF, yes I would say it was stupid, and I bet the guy who did it is thinking the same thing about now. Unless he just enjoys giving thousands of dollars to attorneys and a substantial amount in the form of fines to the government. But then I don't know the guy, maybe he's got millions of dollars laying around and nothing better to do with it than try to test the waters and see how serious the state is when you kill an animal that's listed on the endangered species list.
Quote from: KFhunter on October 14, 2014, 11:50:15 AMQuote from: bobcat on October 14, 2014, 10:55:09 AMKF, yes I would say it was stupid, and I bet the guy who did it is thinking the same thing about now. Unless he just enjoys giving thousands of dollars to attorneys and a substantial amount in the form of fines to the government. But then I don't know the guy, maybe he's got millions of dollars laying around and nothing better to do with it than try to test the waters and see how serious the state is when you kill an animal that's listed on the endangered species list. I'd say he was honest to a fault. If being honest and telling WDFW he shot a wolf that was threatening his livestock under the 'caught in the act' rule is stupid.......hmmm I see your point Bobcat. toucheHas that been determined? Last time I was in Pullman all I saw was wheat and lentils being farmed. He'll have no defense if he was defending plants.
Quote from: AspenBud on October 14, 2014, 01:14:16 PMQuote from: KFhunter on October 14, 2014, 11:50:15 AMQuote from: bobcat on October 14, 2014, 10:55:09 AMKF, yes I would say it was stupid, and I bet the guy who did it is thinking the same thing about now. Unless he just enjoys giving thousands of dollars to attorneys and a substantial amount in the form of fines to the government. But then I don't know the guy, maybe he's got millions of dollars laying around and nothing better to do with it than try to test the waters and see how serious the state is when you kill an animal that's listed on the endangered species list. I'd say he was honest to a fault. If being honest and telling WDFW he shot a wolf that was threatening his livestock under the 'caught in the act' rule is stupid.......hmmm I see your point Bobcat. toucheHas that been determined? Last time I was in Pullman all I saw was wheat and lentils being farmed. He'll have no defense if he was defending plants.I know a lot of people in Pullman that have; cows, horses, chickens, lamas, cats, dogs, children, wives, husbands and other small farm animals that I am sure I forgot.
Lots of cougars in Pullman that need protection also.
This a true story because I read it in the paper today.but ya sounds more like people snitched him off rather than him turning himself in.too bad those that can go to that meeting and pitch for a hunting season on them.
This happened near my house so I know some of the missing details. This wolf was about thirty yards from highway 195. about a half mile from Pullman. Let me repeat that, a half mile from Pullman. It was walking in between 3 houses all with young toddler children or grand children that are often outside playing, one of the places is a horse boarding facility with over 30 high value horses and some cattle and dogs. It was not simply walking through the area. it was seen in the same area the night before. The farmer was protecting his kids, property, livestock and his business. The only reason it was chased was because it was skyline when they wanted to shoot it and they had to drive a few road miles to get to a spot to see it. The wolf was not killed by the farmer, it was injured and once they saw it was no longer a threat they called the game officials. The officials then came out and ended the wolf's life. Wolves do not belong this close to a city. If any of you saw a wolf that close to where your kids play in their yard, let alone their livestock and horses, you would do the same. I am thankful It was not me, and that I did not have to take this upon my shoulders. But I assure you I would have done the same thing in a second had I seen it first. Everyone needs to get behind this man and his family.[/quoteWhen they file charges on this man they couldn't care less if it was near his kids or house. Their absolute number one without a shadow of a doubt purpose of filing charges is to get a conviction. They will throw multiple charges at him and he will go through tens of thousands of dollars paying lawyers fees and then they will make him a plea bargain deal that might not even be true but it will cost him a ton less than going to court. Even though there is a good chance a jury would throw it out his attorney will tell him that there is also a chance he would be convicted. So the man will go down as a wolf poacher and general skum of the earth even though all he was doing is keeping his grandkids safe from a wolf. Nobody will ever know about the real truth because the press will not report the true facts because nearly all of the media is liberal wolf worshipping idiots.