collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Small Skykomish Steelhead  (Read 5547 times)

Online RC

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: May 2019
  • Posts: 108
  • Location: Monroe
    • NA
  • Groups: NA
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #15 on: January 01, 2024, 01:46:04 PM »
I spoke to a hatchery worker a few years ago that told me the changes we’re seeing is the result of the WFC decision that changed hatchery management for skamania steelhead. I believe they are using a stock of steelhead tied more closely to the Snohomish system, which are smaller?  Hopefully someone else can shed some more light on this, but bottom line is that this is the future of steelhead fishing on the Snohomish system. The worker also told me all the new pens up there are for raising chinook to come back to reiter, but who knows if we’ll be able to fish for them.

Offline Fishmaker57

  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2017
  • Posts: 282
  • Location: Eastern Wa.
  • Groups: Ducks Unlimited, CCA
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #16 on: January 01, 2024, 02:46:39 PM »
I caught 14” rainbows in the upper Sky drainage thin blue lines this past year with almost regularity. A 16” fish(rainbow) on the main river seems totally conceivable without any other thoughts coming to mind. There are definitely at least some resident fish in the main stem.

On the right track here, I believe. Not all hatchery released Steelhad smolts migrate to the salt. Some residualization takes place, particularly when the smolts get too big in the pond, or become precocious. At some facilities, smolts are allowed to volitionally leave the pond when ready; after a period of time, those that don’t leave are considered residualized and are planted in lakes.

Online 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #17 on: January 01, 2024, 03:52:39 PM »
I spoke to a hatchery worker a few years ago that told me the changes we’re seeing is the result of the WFC decision that changed hatchery management for skamania steelhead. I believe they are using a stock of steelhead tied more closely to the Snohomish system, which are smaller?  Hopefully someone else can shed some more light on this, but bottom line is that this is the future of steelhead fishing on the Snohomish system. The worker also told me all the new pens up there are for raising chinook to come back to reiter, but who knows if we’ll be able to fish for them.

The Skamania stock are the summer fish. Winter fish have always been Chambers Creek stock. They are supposed to be using wild summer broodstock for the summer program now. They may not be as big as Skamania stock but still a good move as far as I'm concerned. I'd be very surprised to see them ever use wild winter fish for their hatchery stock based on run timing alone.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline simondude

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jan 2010
  • Posts: 166
  • Location: Monroe
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #18 on: January 01, 2024, 04:07:00 PM »
I heard that during covid the state opened the gates and let all the fish out. So they were letting smolts out and that's what's returning now. The fish are returning a year before they should be.

Online 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #19 on: January 01, 2024, 04:15:50 PM »
I heard that during covid the state opened the gates and let all the fish out. So they were letting smolts out and that's what's returning now. The fish are returning a year before they should be.

I don't think that's how it works. Steelhead are biologically tuned to head to salt at a certain age. Just because they are let loose from the ponds doesn't mean they head straight to the salt.
« Last Edit: January 07, 2024, 08:04:19 AM by 7mmfan »
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline ridgefire

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 1411
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #20 on: January 06, 2024, 11:48:20 PM »
We floated the river today and I l only landed one fish. Nice Rainbow  that was 17-18” or so. Pretty slow day of fishing.

Offline Rutnbuxnbulls

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2018
  • Posts: 315
  • Location: Spokane, WA
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #21 on: January 07, 2024, 05:39:10 AM »
Could it be a combination of issues? Maybe food quality/supply in saltwater?
Maybe released early and set up as residents? Brood stock?  I moved a few years ago from that area, Lake Stevens, and I sure do miss fishing the Sky. Beautiful country.

Online 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #22 on: January 07, 2024, 08:12:30 AM »
Salmon guys have theorized for a long time that if you have a lot of Jack's around one year, the following years adult run should be robust. That's all hypothetical though.

There's a lot wrong with the Skykomish system but most of it happens down in the Snohomish and tide water. The number of pinnipeds in the lower end of that river is extreme and smolt hardly have a chance.

Most of our rivers don't have enough feed in them to support many smolt that spend a year or more in the system before heading out because the robust runs of late fall spawning salmon (chum mainly, silvers too) have become so depressed that the biomass in the river continues to decline. We need those carcasses to decompose in the rivers to grow bugs for those smolt to eat. It's a vicious cycle. 
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline LDennis24

  • Bear poker
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 5452
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #23 on: January 07, 2024, 09:18:53 AM »
Not certain on this but there was a lawsuit filed a few years ago and the state was forced to dump a bunch of steelhead into Rock Lake at my parent's place in Whitman County. I believe it was because they were not considered native to the river they intended to stock on the West side. Could this be what your referring to? :dunno:

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16010
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #24 on: January 07, 2024, 11:44:15 AM »
I  fed fish in a rearing pond in Skykomish that were released into the South fork of the Sky. Part of the exercise was to clip a fin at Reiter Hatchery first. Back then we caught many Hatchery fish for years. Of coarse their off spring were native. Used to be some really nice steelhead caught back then.
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline Jake Dogfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2017
  • Posts: 3803
  • Location: Des Moines
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #25 on: January 07, 2024, 12:13:07 PM »
Salmon guys have theorized for a long time that if you have a lot of Jack's around one year, the following years adult run should be robust. That's all hypothetical though.

There's a lot wrong with the Skykomish system but most of it happens down in the Snohomish and tide water. The number of pinnipeds in the lower end of that river is extreme and smolt hardly have a chance.

Most of our rivers don't have enough feed in them to support many smolt that spend a year or more in the system before heading out because the robust runs of late fall spawning salmon (chum mainly, silvers too) have become so depressed that the biomass in the river continues to decline. We need those carcasses to decompose in the rivers to grow bugs for those smolt to eat. It's a vicious cycle.
:yeah:
Environmentalist Fundamentalist

Offline Tbar

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 3038
  • Location: Whatcom county
Re: Small Skykomish Steelhead
« Reply #26 on: January 07, 2024, 12:34:58 PM »
Salmon guys have theorized for a long time that if you have a lot of Jack's around one year, the following years adult run should be robust. That's all hypothetical though.

There's a lot wrong with the Skykomish system but most of it happens down in the Snohomish and tide water. The number of pinnipeds in the lower end of that river is extreme and smolt hardly have a chance.

Most of our rivers don't have enough feed in them to support many smolt that spend a year or more in the system before heading out because the robust runs of late fall spawning salmon (chum mainly, silvers too) have become so depressed that the biomass in the river continues to decline. We need those carcasses to decompose in the rivers to grow bugs for those smolt to eat. It's a vicious cycle.
[/b]
 :yeah:
Spot on 7mm.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal