Free: Contests & Raffles.
I keep coming back in my head to the fact that you can't retroactively manage wildlife. Look at the other populations in the state. Why isn't salmon fishing managed in the same way as big game hunting? We could count how many people caught fish and how many were caught last year and adjust next years fishing limits and seasons accordingly. But that is not how we do it. We limit the number of fish and even the type of a species you can catch and possess, today in real time. I think the notion of managing by estimating success rates is pure folly. All it will take is one anomaly in a given year and a herd is decimated, or a GMU is shot out, or even worse a population is damaged to a point that continued hunting is too risky. That is not good game management.
There tend to be enough 2 pts leftover (making 3 or 4 the following year) that the herd can carry on. When they allowed any bull, some of the westside units got hit so hard that virtually nothing was left to breed the cows and the herds crashed. Those went special permit for a number of years (i.e. dickey).
I think WDFW does a fair job of managing our wildlife and seasons. They can't count everything, modeling is needed. I think you are somehow misguided thinking everyone will hunt the same unit, that will never happen, hunters try to go where others don't. I also think WDFW does a fair job of estimating fish runs and setting seasons accordingly as run numbers change from the estimates.One big thing, WDFW can't satisfy everyone and some people will always complain. The biggest problem I see is lack of trying to maximize fish and herd numbers, too many predators in the water and on land, loss of winter range and spawning area, failure to utilize the full potential of existing WDFW and other public lands and waters. We are the smallest western state with nearly the largest population, we must maximize our resources.