collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: meat to deer weight question  (Read 12123 times)

Offline Born2late

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 783
meat to deer weight question
« on: October 17, 2016, 06:46:02 PM »
So my brother shot a blacktail and we had to bone it out to get it home.He took it to the butcher and he weighed it and there was 90 pounds of meat and that was after trimming on site and cutting out the blood damaged shoulder.
My question is: If you have that much meat what is the approximate deer weight?Or has anyone ever kept track of that when boning one out at home?

This brings up a question about bears also but i'll start a different page for that.

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #1 on: October 17, 2016, 07:28:39 PM »
I have. I'll try to pu up the link to m archery deer this year.

That's a big deer!  My son's weighed only 80 pounds gutted... a ice size yearling for here.

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #2 on: October 17, 2016, 07:38:17 PM »
I guess I didn't detail it. 

I had 51 pounds of meat including heart and liver and he was 180 lb guts and all.  Having given this data, I have had deer with more meat that have weighed less overall. If I recall, my ratio is usually about 1/3 meat to full body weight.

Offline Born2late

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 783
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #3 on: October 17, 2016, 08:28:00 PM »
Thanks, Its hard to judge when they are lying up there because your guessed weight gets heavier the farther you pack it out. :chuckle:

Offline smalldog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Mar 2012
  • Posts: 112
  • Location: Buckley,Wa
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2016, 09:05:23 PM »
He is right, it is 3X the boned out weight of the deer. Absolutely no bones !

Offline fishnfur

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2014
  • Posts: 3805
  • Location: longview
“When I die, I want to die like my grandfather who died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like all the passengers in his car.”  - Will Rogers

Offline Damnimissed

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2013
  • Posts: 621
  • Location: Salmon, ID
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #6 on: October 17, 2016, 09:21:29 PM »
I wish I would've weighed my biggest bodied BT. I got 106lbs of boned out, trimmed, ready to wrap meat. It really bothers me that I never weighted it field dressed. It was a really heavy revert 2 point.

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #7 on: October 17, 2016, 10:26:31 PM »
I wish I would've weighed my biggest bodied BT. I got 106lbs of boned out, trimmed, ready to wrap meat. It really bothers me that I never weighted it field dressed. It was a really heavy revert 2 point.

Dang, I shot a two year old cow elk once that I only got about that much out of her.....  I did shoot a N. Cal. Blacktail that dressed out at 165, though I did not weight the meat back then.

Offline robodad

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 4437
  • Location: PA, WA.
    • frog4life !!
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #8 on: October 17, 2016, 10:50:14 PM »
I weighed the carcass of my 2pt blacktail (no head, hide, guts or legs below the knees) this year at #100 and got #50 of cleaned pkgd meat excluding heart and liver. he was an average to smaller deer and no bloodshot loss !

https://goo.gl/photos/9vRTZwVHdbYDbtvR8

I guess this site doesn't open google photos so just click the link !!

The essense of freedom is the proper limitation of government !!!

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #9 on: October 17, 2016, 11:30:03 PM »
He is right, it is 3X the boned out weight of the deer. Absolutely no bones !

It's funny, it's the same for Dungeness crab.

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 7015
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #10 on: October 18, 2016, 02:33:47 AM »
100 lbs of boned meat.... I can make a pretty accurate guess.  One huge son of a gun. 

Offline lokidog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 15186
  • Location: Sultan/Wisconsin
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #11 on: October 19, 2016, 08:59:59 AM »
Hanging weight on my son's buck this year was 80#, a decent forky yearling.  I was surprised at how much meat, 37 pounds, unless I counted my burger twice, then it would be 31.  I count the liver and heart weight. 

Offline OutHouse

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 3302
  • Location: Cowiche WA
  • Department of Foliage, Lifetime Member
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #12 on: October 19, 2016, 09:17:25 AM »
So my brother shot a blacktail and we had to bone it out to get it home.He took it to the butcher and he weighed it and there was 90 pounds of meat and that was after trimming on site and cutting out the blood damaged shoulder.
My question is: If you have that much meat what is the approximate deer weight?Or has anyone ever kept track of that when boning one out at home?

This brings up a question about bears also but i'll start a different page for that.

I agree with JDhasty. That deer would be in excess of 240 pounds if that was the weight of the meat alone. Why don't you send us a pic of the deer in the field. I'd like to see a pic of a deer that big.

Offline scrapperdude

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 88
  • Location: Tacoma
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #13 on: October 19, 2016, 10:33:03 AM »
That's a big black tail, have only had one that big and it was an older 2 point  :chuckle:

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 7015
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #14 on: October 19, 2016, 10:47:33 AM »
http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,202888.50.html

This one was just 110 lbs hanging. 

Head, hide, hocks off

Offline workstohunt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 252
  • Location: Chehalis,WA
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #15 on: October 19, 2016, 02:06:01 PM »
I have been keeping track for sometime now. I got tired of guessing, bought a scale and keep a log!
We weigh the animal gutted, no heart or liver, hide on with head. Then we weigh finished meat ready to package.
Depending on shot placement it has run 30% of the field dressed weight. Sometimes more, and a few times less on smaller animals.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #16 on: October 19, 2016, 02:10:36 PM »
Where is Dman and his 500 pound blacktails?

If you get a 100 pounds of meat, you just shot a tank.



Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4623
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #17 on: October 19, 2016, 02:14:26 PM »
If you get a 100 pounds of meat, you just shot a tank.

Agreed.  I don't think I've ever boned out more than 85-90 pounds of meat off of the mule deer I've shot, and that wasn't with meat loss.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline JakeLand

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (+35)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 4519
  • Location: Wet side
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #18 on: October 19, 2016, 07:54:32 PM »



Here's 2 blacktails

Offline Born2late

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+21)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2012
  • Posts: 783
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #19 on: October 19, 2016, 07:59:24 PM »
The top deer jake posted for me is the deer that my brother just shot that tnt meats said had 90 pounds of meat.
The bottom one is my sons from last year and it was close to the same size.

Offline OutHouse

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 3302
  • Location: Cowiche WA
  • Department of Foliage, Lifetime Member
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #20 on: October 25, 2016, 12:01:31 PM »
Wow. Both nice deer and that bottom one is a toad. That neck! Goodness.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10677
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #21 on: October 25, 2016, 08:54:13 PM »
On a deer you get roughly a third of their live weight in boned out meat.  This CO buck yielded 109 pounds of boned meat.  I was able to really pick him clean due to where he was so I feel I got as close to that third number as a guy can get.  He was so big I had to take a pic next to him for a size comparison  :chuckle:
« Last Edit: October 26, 2016, 01:08:16 PM by BLRman »
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Bantams

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 75
  • Location: W WA
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #22 on: October 26, 2016, 10:35:31 AM »
Our blacktail bucks typically hang at 110-128# and yield up to 70# boned out, packaged meat.  Does yield 40-45# meat (can't remember hanging weights).  Hanging weight is at the locker - skinned, gutted, no head or lower limbs. 

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #23 on: October 26, 2016, 10:38:09 AM »
On a deer you get roughly a third of theit life weight in boned out meat.  This CO buck yielded 109 pounds of boned meat.  I was able to really pick him clean due to where he was so I feel I got as close to that third number as a guy can get.  He was so big I had to take a pic next to him for a size comparison  :chuckle:

That's a horse. How much back and hindquarter fat did he have?
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline 7mmfan

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 5499
  • Location: Marysville
    • https://www.facebook.com/rory.oconnor.9480
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #24 on: October 26, 2016, 10:38:50 AM »
Where is Dman and his 500 pound blacktails?

If you get a 100 pounds of meat, you just shot a tank.




I love this picture. With how much closer that doe is than the buck and how much bigger he still appears, you know that was an absolute beast.
I hunt, therefore I am.... I fish, therefore I lie.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10677
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #25 on: October 26, 2016, 10:43:20 AM »
On a deer you get roughly a third of theit life weight in boned out meat.  This CO buck yielded 109 pounds of boned meat.  I was able to really pick him clean due to where he was so I feel I got as close to that third number as a guy can get.  He was so big I had to take a pic next to him for a size comparison  :chuckle:

That's a horse. How much back and hindquarter fat did he have?
  surprisingly not much.  Low land deer, so he didn't have the crazy amount of fat like the mountain deer carry.  Absolutely amazing genetics in that deer.  Not only the giant body but inches of antler.  He was only 4.5 yo tops too.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Whitpirate

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2011
  • Posts: 2031
  • Location: Duvall, by way of Spokane/Metaline Falls
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #26 on: October 26, 2016, 01:07:19 PM »
On a deer you get roughly a third of theit life weight in boned out meat.  This CO buck yielded 109 pounds of boned meat.  I was able to really pick him clean due to where he was so I feel I got as close to that third number as a guy can get.  He was so big I had to take a pic next to him for a size comparison  :chuckle:

"Big" is relative here....

Offline JDHasty

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2015
  • Posts: 7015
  • Location: Tacoma
  • Groups: NRA Benefactor Member, GOA Life Member, Father of 3 NRA Life Members
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #27 on: October 26, 2016, 03:33:29 PM »
Our blacktail bucks typically hang at 110-128# and yield up to 70# boned out, packaged meat.  Does yield 40-45# meat (can't remember hanging weights).  Hanging weight is at the locker - skinned, gutted, no head or lower limbs.

That is more or less consistent with what we get. 

Offline euskfnm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Pilgrim
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2016
  • Posts: 6
  • Location: Bellevue
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #28 on: October 26, 2016, 04:15:31 PM »
I harvested this buck last Friday, seems to be a small buck, the weight of meat with bones (excluding  head , Guts, skin)  was 89 LB

Offline Pygmy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 409
  • Location: Western Washington
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #29 on: October 27, 2016, 09:05:50 PM »
I harvested this buck last Friday, seems to be a small buck, the weight of meat with bones (excluding  head , Guts, skin)  was 89 LB
Hey, great job! Very happy for you and your family!

Offline scoutdog346

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2014
  • Posts: 508
  • Location: tacoma
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #30 on: October 27, 2016, 09:40:20 PM »
90lbs of cut the way u said is a big.

Offline TikkaT3-270Shortmag

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 1012
  • Location: Chehalis
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #31 on: October 28, 2016, 03:55:45 AM »
Im just curious as to why weigh them?  Ive never weighed my deer or elk.  Never really mattered to me.  Just curious??

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk


Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10677
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #32 on: October 28, 2016, 06:33:13 AM »
Im just curious as to why weigh them?  Ive never weighed my deer or elk.  Never really mattered to me.  Just curious??

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
  I'm the same way.  Only reason I weighted the meat from that deer I posted was because he was much larger than most deer body wise and I was very curious.
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline nwwanderer

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4725
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #33 on: October 28, 2016, 07:55:43 AM »
We have weighed quite a few, good way to gauge condition of the critters and understand what is going on with the seasons and habitats.  % weight loss during rut, weight for age, etc. all are useful.  As far as meat yield, way to many variables for any accuracy.  243 through the ribs or a 338 through a shoulder?  Rib fragment through a rumen or ear holed?  Rutted out old boy or a pre-rut fatty?

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #34 on: October 28, 2016, 09:49:56 AM »
So my brother shot a blacktail and we had to bone it out to get it home.He took it to the butcher and he weighed it and there was 90 pounds of meat and that was after trimming on site and cutting out the blood damaged shoulder.
My question is: If you have that much meat what is the approximate deer weight?Or has anyone ever kept track of that when boning one out at home?

This brings up a question about bears also but i'll start a different page for that.
Based on the best data I know, average meat yield from a Wyoming mule deer is a hair over 1/3 whole weight (whole weight is the difference between live weight, and weight lost from gunshot, which varies from negligible (bleeds out internally, small caliber spine/brain shot that doesn't sever a major vessel) to more than 10 pounds for total bleed out, multiple shots and/or large expanding bullets that can eject pounds of bone/muscle/gut).  The actual figure for mule deer, without rounding, is 33.8% of whole weight, so 3x meat yield, excluding heart, liver and/or other organs, is VERY close to the average live weight. 

90 pounds of finished meat (excluding organs) would be the average yield from a 270 pound buck. However, you will get back less than what is dropped off as boneless meat at the butcher, so a better estimate is to multiply the weight of what he gets back from the butcher x 3.  My own experience with deer is that finished meat is about 80-85% of boned out pack weight, suggesting his buck is around 216-230 pounds "as he lays".  Either way, a big buck!  Average whole weights, approximately, range from 50-70 lbs for a fawn, 90-140 for yearling bucks and does, and 150-175 for 2+ and older bucks.       

Other conversions that may be of interest:

Whole weight = 1.42 x Field-dressed weight (gutted, lower legs off)
Whole weight = 1.69 x Carcass weight (head and hide removed from field-dressed)
Boneless lean muscle = 0.48 x Field-dressed weight, 0.57 x carcass weight

These data are from hunter-harvested Wyoming mule deer, and include boneless lean from the ribs and flank which many hunters don't take, or are lost by hanging/drying or skinning errors.  If you don't have those, the boneless lean conversions are 0.44 x field-dressed weight, 0.52 x carcass weight. The conversions are consistent for both does and pre-rut bucks.  I don't have conversions for rutting bucks, which can range from higher yields at the start of the rut, to lower yields post-rut - especially dominant bucks.

Conversions for whitetails from PA and WI are:

Whole weight = 1.28 x Field-dressed weight (gutted, lower legs on)
Whole weight = 1.71 x Carcass weight (head, hide lower legs removed from field-dressed, minimal gunshot loss)
Boneless = 0.7 x carcass weight (all soft tissue removed from carcass, minimal gunshot loss, includes muscle, fascia, tendons, ligaments, fat and lymph nodes)
Boneless lean = .67 x boneless, 0.47 x carcass weight, 0.37 x whole weight 

« Last Edit: October 28, 2016, 12:01:50 PM by DOUBLELUNG »
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #35 on: October 28, 2016, 09:57:45 AM »
Im just curious as to why weigh them?  Ive never weighed my deer or elk.  Never really mattered to me.  Just curious??

Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk


Other than simple curiosity, the data are useful for game departments when refereeing disputes between hunters who don't believe they got back their whole animal, and meat processors.  They are also used to prosecute dishonest processors.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10677
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #36 on: October 28, 2016, 11:31:34 AM »
So my brother shot a blacktail and we had to bone it out to get it home.He took it to the butcher and he weighed it and there was 90 pounds of meat and that was after trimming on site and cutting out the blood damaged shoulder.
My question is: If you have that much meat what is the approximate deer weight?Or has anyone ever kept track of that when boning one out at home?

This brings up a question about bears also but i'll start a different page for that.
Based on the best data I know, average meat yield from a Wyoming mule deer is a hair over 1/3 whole weight (whole weight is the difference between live weight, and weight lost from gunshot, which varies from negligible (bleeds out internally, small caliber spine/brain shot that doesn't sever a major vessel) to more than 10 pounds for total bleed out, multiple shots and/or large expanding bullets that can eject pounds of bone/muscle/gut).  The actual figure for mule deer, without rounding, is 33.8% of whole weight, so 3x meat yield, excluding heart, liver and/or other organs, is VERY close to the average live weight. 

90 pounds of finished meat (excluding organs) would be the average yield from a 270 pound buck. However, you will get back less than what is dropped off as boneless meat at the butcher, so a better estimate is to multiply the weight of what he gets back from the butcher x 3.  My own experience with deer is that finished meat is about 80-85% of boned out pack weight, suggesting his buck is around 216-230 pounds "as he lays".  Either way, a big buck!  Average whole weights, approximately, range from 50-70 lbs for a fawn, 90-140 for yearling bucks and does, and 150-175 for 2+ and older.       

Other conversions that may be of interest:

Whole weight = 1.42 x Field-dressed weight (gutted, lower legs off)
Whole weight = 1.69 x Carcass weight (head and hide removed from field-dressed)
Boneless lean muscle = 0.48 x Field-dressed weight, 0.57 x carcass weight

These data are from hunter-harvested Wyoming mule deer, and include boneless lean from the ribs and flank which many hunters don't take, or are lost by hanging/drying or skinning errors.  If you don't have those, the boneless lean conversions are 0.44 x field-dressed weight, 0.52 x carcass weight. The conversions are consistent for both does and pre-rut bucks.  I don't have conversions for rutting bucks, which can range from higher yields at the start of the rut, to lower yields post-rut - especially dominant bucks.

Conversions for whitetails from PA and WI are:

Whole weight = 1.28 x Field-dressed weight (gutted, lower legs on)
Whole weight = 1.71 x Carcass weight (head, hide lower legs removed from field-dressed, minimal gunshot loss)
Boneless = 0.7 x carcass weight (all soft tissue removed from carcass, minimal gunshot loss, includes muscle, fascia, tendons, ligaments, fat and lymph nodes)
Boneless lean = .67 x boneless, 0.47 x carcass weight, 0.37 x whole weight 


  What are you, a biologist or something :dunno:



 :chuckle: 8)
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16010
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #37 on: October 28, 2016, 11:47:44 AM »
Or a mathematician!! 
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #38 on: October 28, 2016, 11:50:10 AM »
 What are you, a biologist or something :dunno:



 :chuckle: 8)
[/quote]
I just play one on TV 8)

Skyvalhunter, I confess I do like to geek out on numbers.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #39 on: October 28, 2016, 11:58:27 AM »
Wardens also use it ... for example, in Idaho and Wyoming (probably elsewhere too), If you have a set of 6-point elk antlers and the boned out meat, and the meat load looks suspiciously small, they will weigh it and expect around 260 pounds of boned out meat.  There is some leeway, but if you have a legitimate reason for substantially less, you are well advised to take photos showing that he was missing a hind leg, had a gangrened shoulder from an older wound, dwarfism, you Texas heart shot him with a .416 Rigby and it exited through a front shoulder ...
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline Skyvalhunter

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 16010
  • Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #40 on: October 28, 2016, 12:09:50 PM »
Or you and your buddies got really hungry and decided to pig out. Or the possibility of a grizz packing away part
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #41 on: October 28, 2016, 12:57:08 PM »
Or you and your buddies got really hungry and decided to pig out. Or the possibility of a grizz packing away part
More legit reasons to document!
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #42 on: October 28, 2016, 01:00:35 PM »
Another bit of trivia: I hunt with a 2200 ci pack, 2200 ci will hold 84 pounds of boned out meat.  That means almost any deer I kill I can bone out and fit in my pack, making one return trip out (that used to be relevant, before my health declined).
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

Offline Karl Blanchard

  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 10677
  • Location: Selah, WA
  • Jonathan_S hunting apparel prostaff
  • Groups: Sitka Gear Fan Boy for LIFE
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #43 on: October 28, 2016, 04:11:55 PM »
Another bit of trivia: I hunt with a 2200 ci pack, 2200 ci will hold 84 pounds of boned out meat.  That means almost any deer I kill I can bone out and fit in my pack, making one return trip out (that used to be relevant, before my health declined).
Well good lord!!!!!  I've had my 7200 stuffed pretty tight with elk meat a few times.  Wonder what those devils weighted out at :chuckle: :bdid:
It is foolish and wrong to mourn these men.  Rather, we should thank god that such men lived.  -General George S. Patton

Aaron's Profile:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;u=2875
Aaron's Posts:  http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=2875
Aaron's Facebook:  https://www.facebook.com/aaron.blanchard.94

Offline DOUBLELUNG

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 5837
  • Location: Wenatchee
Re: meat to deer weight question
« Reply #44 on: October 31, 2016, 08:00:12 AM »
Another bit of trivia: I hunt with a 2200 ci pack, 2200 ci will hold 84 pounds of boned out meat.  That means almost any deer I kill I can bone out and fit in my pack, making one return trip out (that used to be relevant, before my health declined).
Well good lord!!!!!  I've had my 7200 stuffed pretty tight with elk meat a few times.  Wonder what those devils weighted out at :chuckle: :bdid:
I packed a boned out cow off a steep ridge, left the pack where my buddies could drive to it (I had a meeting I could not cancel).  They weighed the pack at 136lbs :bdid:, I weighed the pack later at 7 (Kelty Tioga).  If thats not the heaviest I ever did I am even dumber than I thought.
As long as we have the habitat, we can argue forever about who gets to kill what and when.  No habitat = no game.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Tasty Pinks! by Stein
[Today at 11:55:22 AM]


2025 Crab! by Stein
[Today at 11:05:32 AM]


2025 Area 9 King Opener by Stein
[Today at 11:02:57 AM]


If this is your trap by Ridgeratt
[Today at 09:13:08 AM]


Crabbing at cornet bay? by mikey549
[Today at 09:07:29 AM]


Triple Blacktail Pedestal by HntnFsh
[Today at 09:02:31 AM]


Boundary Waters walleye trip by Angry Perch
[Today at 07:17:54 AM]


Livestock near 49 degrees north? by nwwanderer
[Today at 06:12:32 AM]


GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by BigredRusch
[Yesterday at 09:27:40 PM]


JBLM by Nash
[Yesterday at 07:05:57 PM]


AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!! by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 06:41:20 PM]


William o Douglas lakes by hughjorgan
[Yesterday at 06:28:07 PM]


10 years ago- Now by Ryan P
[Yesterday at 05:51:57 PM]


Please Comment on new Game management Plan, RE Furbearers by redi
[Yesterday at 04:13:27 PM]


Pre season Archery SALE by BigJs Outdoor Store
[Yesterday at 12:39:09 PM]


Cell cam recommendation for security? by birdshooter1189
[Yesterday at 12:08:32 PM]


2024 DFW Wolf report by throttlejocky20
[Yesterday at 09:52:55 AM]


WA Moose scouting by hunter399
[Yesterday at 09:46:20 AM]


JBLM Archery by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 09:08:57 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal