collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Letters What to say and what not to say. From the experts.  (Read 1966 times)

Offline Coldeadhands

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 28
Letters What to say and what not to say. From the experts.
« on: April 05, 2009, 12:21:48 PM »
Slowleak 
Juvenille at Sea

Registered: 12/31/04
Posts: 145
Loc: Kent, WA  I don’t want to come off like I think I’m some kind of expert… I’m not. I didn’t spend the night in a Holiday Inn Express but I did spend yesterday on the Capitol campus. In speaking with several genuine experts (who are on our side) in response to some of my communications, I learned there are certain things we can do to increase the effectiveness of communications with our elected officials.

For the purposes of these communications we should attack the legislation not the perceived author. In general, as soon as it becomes a personal attack the focus goes in the wrong direction. Although many legislators may not like some of their peers, or their tactics, they can’t and won’t do anything about it; in fact they circle the wagons to protect their own (the next time it might be them under attack). I think Salmo G experienced some wagon circling yesterday.

Senator Jacobsen is a very powerful man and he can and does control a lot of legislation. It is fine to point out the committee that produced or modified the legislation, but not the individuals. It was also pointed out that often times we do not really know whose name is on the amendment so we may be inadvertently attacking the wrong person. Having said that, a properly placed quote regarding the Chairman's desire to “neuter” the Commission might be well received.

Unfortunately, the same thing goes for the Treaty Tribes. Attacking the tribes will not get us very far because the legislature can’t or won’t do anything about them either.

Lobbyists, on the other hand, appear to be fair game and there’s no bag limit.

Legislators are elected officials and, as was pointed out yesterday, if a thousand constituents are on the “wrong” side of an issue and only one is on “right” side, the elected official will follow the votes. So we need to focus on the legislation and why we support or oppose it; short and to the point with two or three bullets is more effective than long and ranting; those tend to find their way to the delete button or round file.

However you choose to do it, DO keep those emails, letters and calls coming; it is VERY evident they are working.
 

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

BNSF Land Access by HntnFsh
[Today at 06:45:39 AM]


Roosevelt Elk. Please nudge me in the right direction. I feel hopeless. by HntnFsh
[Today at 06:33:28 AM]


How is late season whitetail hunting? Good, bad, decent? GMU 105/117? by eddyr
[Today at 06:27:31 AM]


Slide Ridge Quality tag holders by Britt-dog
[Today at 06:09:06 AM]


2025 elk success thread!! by jeffitz
[Today at 04:04:14 AM]


My Entiat Late tag thread by scottfrick
[Yesterday at 10:15:40 PM]


Stevens double barrel 410 by scotsman
[Yesterday at 09:39:58 PM]


Xlr element vs mdt hnt26 by dmoua
[Yesterday at 09:30:35 PM]


My Wenaha bull by clearwater
[Yesterday at 09:06:15 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 08:55:39 PM]


East Side Quail Numbers? by Goshawk
[Yesterday at 08:55:20 PM]


Hunting late season, where would you go? by kodiak06
[Yesterday at 07:43:16 PM]


Late Season archery elk by jason stevens
[Yesterday at 06:26:12 PM]


Upland bird carry options by GWP
[Yesterday at 05:28:01 PM]


3 pintails by hdshot
[Yesterday at 05:23:19 PM]


Game Warden Channel featuring my nephew on Nevada Wild by danderson
[Yesterday at 03:51:08 PM]


Hunting DNR Natural Area Preserves by avidnwoutdoorsman
[Yesterday at 03:26:14 PM]


Flynn’s Hunts!!! by Tafinder
[Yesterday at 12:37:35 PM]


Dash cams by jrebel
[Yesterday at 12:25:23 PM]


Mechanic help 4.0 ford by Woodchuck
[Yesterday at 11:50:39 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal