collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Poacher has to pay PETA  (Read 13041 times)

Offline Dman

  • Dmanmastertracker
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 1468
Re: Poacher has to pay PETA
« Reply #15 on: January 04, 2008, 02:27:42 PM »
 That's total *censored*.

 Unethical to say the least, PETA has been convicted of animal abuse crimes themselves for illegal euphanization, they are DEFINITELY not a viable candidate for a conservation fund.

Offline popeshawnpaul

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3583
  • Location: Bellevue, WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/smccully
    • Nature Photography
Re: Poacher has to pay PETA
« Reply #16 on: January 04, 2008, 02:29:38 PM »
I would direct my client to pay the $500 to RMEF or FNAWS and then ask the judge to consider the condition satisfied and nullifying the requirement that the payment goes only to PETA.  If he didn't agree, I would appeal.  There are rules on what they can require...at least in WA.

Offline robb92

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 3685
  • Location: Spokane Wa, Andrews AFB, Maryland and King George, VA
Re: Poacher has to pay PETA
« Reply #17 on: January 04, 2008, 06:33:45 PM »
I don't the fees go to that Humane Society, it shouldn't even go to the State Human society it should go to what it was charged for, wildlife management.
"ITS NOT WHAT THE WISE MAN SAYS BUT WHAT THE WISE MAN DOES IN HIS LIFE THAT MATTERS"


Offline LongTatLaw

  • Suckling Slayer!
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 1784
  • Location: Olympia
  • My 2009 West WA - Shotgun kitty Kat
Re: Poacher has to pay PETA
« Reply #18 on: January 04, 2008, 06:57:32 PM »
Hey shawn...you got full access lexisnexis... I no longer have any.

Get me an address or even a name and a court house and Ill get the address. I can write a direct letter...

no worries for me. I got the JD but not a member of any bar...So I could hit him up. Just seems wrong and even worse...its a very very very bad legal precedent to set and let live!

dave

Offline popeshawnpaul

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3583
  • Location: Bellevue, WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/smccully
    • Nature Photography
Re: Poacher has to pay PETA
« Reply #19 on: January 04, 2008, 07:04:58 PM »
Sorry man, i only got access to WA cases.  This appears to be a Colorado case.  If it was a Washington case I could give you everything on it including what the judge was thinking when he ordered it.  The judge is named in the article.  One could write him a letter I suppose...  This also could have been the prosecutor's idea and recommendation to the judge.  Even the defense attorney could have agreed to it as part of a plea I suppose.  If the parties agreed to this as part of the deal, it might not even be something the judge decided.  I'm just saying we would need to find out if the defendant agreed to these conditions or not.  If he did it's on him...

Shawn

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: Poacher has to pay PETA
« Reply #20 on: January 10, 2008, 08:21:57 PM »
I realize I am very new to this list however I am not new to PETA and all the damage they do.  I cannot believe a judge ordered someone to pay restitution to an organization that is under federal scrutiny for
1) animal crimes ...unlawful euthanization and disposal that lead to a "littering" conviction and
2) they are affiliated with ALF and ELF two organizations considered domestic terrorists

I hate poachers and thieves of all sorts and I hate PETA......that judge should have had the fine paid to the state wildlife dept. 

of course The Vic case required him to pay anti's as well.........I am beginning to wonder about this country :dunno: :bash:

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Sturgeon Set-ups by gallion_t
[Today at 06:33:10 AM]


E WA waterfowl guide by Tbar
[Today at 06:07:04 AM]


Share your out of state experience by andrew_in_idaho
[Yesterday at 10:23:07 PM]


Weatherby Mark V Feeding Issue - Amateur Gunsmith Advice Needed by Reidus
[Yesterday at 09:59:59 PM]


Winthrop - Winter Range Road Closures by Kingofthemountain83
[Yesterday at 08:35:55 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by redi
[Yesterday at 08:34:06 PM]


Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by bigmacc
[Yesterday at 07:51:17 PM]


Poll: Supreme Court will decide if 'habitual drug users' lose their gun rights by Tinmaniac
[Yesterday at 07:30:40 PM]


Restraining Order to Prevent Sherman Wolf Removal by dc
[Yesterday at 07:14:10 PM]


2025 Mt. St. Helens success? by p-ohana
[Yesterday at 05:43:28 PM]


2025 blacktail rut thread by brew
[Yesterday at 05:02:07 PM]


Weatherby Vanguard vs. Browning x bolt by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 04:41:26 PM]


Comment against Ski Resort expanding into Colockum elk/deer habitat by TriggerMike
[Yesterday at 02:55:17 PM]


No upland with dog during deer and elk season? by brokentrail
[Yesterday at 01:56:48 PM]


Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn! by teanawayslayer
[Yesterday at 12:50:07 PM]


Disappearing ink. by bustedoldman
[Yesterday at 11:15:08 AM]


Possible record bull? by time2hunt
[Yesterday at 10:48:01 AM]


East Side by lovetogrouse
[Yesterday at 10:25:04 AM]


West side antler buyers by IdeehoT
[Yesterday at 09:08:16 AM]


Bearpaw Season 2025 by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:47:12 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal