collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: GMAC  (Read 6370 times)

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21754
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: GMAC
« Reply #15 on: March 18, 2010, 11:09:28 AM »
I may be wrong but that thread seems to be where all the concern about the GMAC seems to have started. It seems like this group is looking for someone to blame for the new permit setup, the ultimate responsibility still stays with the WDFW, in my opinion.  :twocents:

You are correct that the WDFW is responsible.  However, GMAC is the only group mentioned that supports the change.  That seems rather shallow.  If there is broad public input, they should be able to mention lots of groups that support it.

"“This plan is designed to give hunters more options for getting the special permits they really want,” said Ware, noting that the proposal was developed with broad public input and support from the WDFW’s Game Management Advisory Committee.

Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Curly

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 20921
  • Location: Thurston County
Re: GMAC
« Reply #16 on: March 18, 2010, 11:12:28 AM »
You're probably right Wingshooter.  I was just questioning if WDFW thought they had pubic support because of the GMAC acceptance of the new proposal.  I was probably jumping to the wrong conclusion.  I hadn't heard of the GMAC until the recent commission meeting and I was just curious about the group.  Sounds like they might be a good group.........although there was a guy from the GMAC at the mtg and he was sure praising the new system.......
May I always be the kind of person my dog thinks I am.

><((((º>` ><((((º>. ><((((º>.¸><((((º>

Offline winshooter88

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 713
Re: GMAC
« Reply #17 on: March 18, 2010, 11:41:48 AM »
You're probably right Wingshooter.  I was just questioning if WDFW thought they had pubic support because of the GMAC acceptance of the new proposal.  I was probably jumping to the wrong conclusion.  I hadn't heard of the GMAC until the recent commission meeting and I was just curious about the group.  Sounds like they might be a good group.........although there was a guy from the GMAC at the mtg and he was sure praising the new system.......

Curly,

I'm sure that some of the GMAC group does support this plan, but I'm also sure that not all of them did.

Offline Shootmoore

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2009
  • Posts: 1301
  • Location: Skagit
Re: GMAC
« Reply #18 on: March 18, 2010, 11:42:46 PM »
Thanks for the info Winshooter.  I found it interesting that there was little or no information available about the GMAC, so I put on my tinfoil hat and assumed the worst.  I think the wolf group made my tinfoil hat a little bigger than it usually is  :P

Shootmoore

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

3 pintails by Klickitatsteelie
[Today at 04:29:05 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 03:21:14 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Kales15
[Today at 02:10:11 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Threewolves
[Today at 01:11:29 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 12:43:12 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal