collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Fluorocarbon leader?  (Read 8430 times)

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Fluorocarbon leader?
« on: August 07, 2010, 04:08:00 PM »
Howdy!
Just wondering if using fluorocarbon leader (for salmon) is worth the extra or is it just hype?

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50305
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2010, 04:21:07 PM »
No experience with it salmon fishing but I use it for my flyfishing leaders for everything except dry flies. I don't know if it's that much better.  :dunno:
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #2 on: August 07, 2010, 04:26:39 PM »
It lacks strength and slips knots easily.  Its harder to deal with, but it is much more transparent and thus you ahve more hookups.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #3 on: August 07, 2010, 04:28:12 PM »
Quote
slips knots easily
In comparison to tradidional leaders that is.  Its harder to get a good knot and in experience thats its weakness, that and cost.  I never worried about cost becasue I figure how much fuel I use etc, and if I can have more hookups....

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #4 on: August 07, 2010, 04:56:05 PM »
I did give it a try last fall but noticed that it was a pain to work with and standard knots were not as reliable.  Is it that much more transparent than good old clear mono?

Offline BLKBEARKLR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 4092
  • Location: Roy, Washington
  • Taxidermist
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #5 on: August 07, 2010, 04:59:07 PM »
I did give it a try last fall but noticed that it was a pain to work with and standard knots were not as reliable.  Is it that much more transparent than good old clear mono?

Polar yes way more transparency.

Get some of the higher end ones P-Line / Seaquer.  And they work just fine on the knots and tensil strength. If all possible I always try to tie palomer knots.

Joe
22 years 3 months and 4 days, happily retired from the U.S Army.


Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #6 on: August 07, 2010, 05:02:52 PM »
I tried P-Line.  It could just be me as far as the knots go. (it seems that I am losing my touch on all aspects of fishing, lol) I was using 30 lb for salmon leaders tying double rigs.  I'll try it again, thanks folks!

Offline fishcrazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 1412
  • Location: Tenino
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #7 on: August 07, 2010, 06:32:32 PM »
I wouldn't waste the money. The stuff goes bad just sitting on the shelf in the store. Knots can be a pain and the fish just don't care. Line size will matter more than what it is made of. IMO If you think they are going to spook from the line then drop it down and don't horse them.
Use a good quality mono like maxima UG and everythign will be fine.

Kris
This family supported by UNION wages. Proud member of UA Local 26

Is the taste of the bait worth the sting of the hook twice?

Offline FC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3954
  • Location: Wa
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #8 on: August 07, 2010, 09:13:32 PM »
Save it for the steelhead, salmon don't care.
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #9 on: August 07, 2010, 09:29:34 PM »
I did give it a try last fall but noticed that it was a pain to work with and standard knots were not as reliable.  Is it that much more transparent than good old clear mono?

Polar yes way more transparency.

Get some of the higher end ones P-Line / Seaquer.  And they work just fine on the knots and tensil strength. If all possible I always try to tie palomer knots.

Joe

I really like seaguar flouro

Flouro will sometimes make a difference. I think with some trout, bass and saltwater fish( Bone fish, tarpon, stripers) I did notice a difference and had more hook-ups vs reg mono. More abrasion resistant too compared to mono

Personally do not think you need flour or steelhead or salmon. My experience is that they are not leader shy.
I like maxima mono for steelhead and salmon :twocents:
Uniknot works for me with flouro

Offline FC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3954
  • Location: Wa
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #10 on: August 07, 2010, 11:32:41 PM »
ribka, what flourocarbon are you using that is more abrasion resistant than mono? Everything I have tried was the exact opposite, I've gotten to the point where I will only use it when the river is crystal clear and the fish are leader shy.
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.

Offline mkcj

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 1945
  • Location: Seatac/Winthrop,Wash
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #11 on: August 08, 2010, 12:07:03 AM »
I only use it if the water is really clear. Just does not hold up against abrasion.

Offline alanger

  • Yar ankle biter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 1617
  • Location: Wennoootchee
  • Team super bait
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #12 on: August 08, 2010, 07:42:21 AM »
salmons are stupid.
~Ankle biter out~

Team super bait!     Gamakatsu     ~Ugly Stick~
Abu Garcia  'Bone Collector'   -Bowtech-  <Berkley fishing>
Cannon~DigiTroll     FLW Outdoors     ~Cabela's~

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #13 on: August 08, 2010, 11:31:04 AM »
Here is an in depth review for those interested:

http://www.tackletour.com/reviewfluorocarbontest.html

As mentioned like the Seaguar flouro for leaders. Frogs hair and Rio also good but more $$$
I think more abrasion resistant IMO. However, see above article not all flouros are equal.

When tying knots do it slowwwllly  when cinching knot and don't forget to lube knot.

Offline FC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3954
  • Location: Wa
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #14 on: August 08, 2010, 12:21:55 PM »
That's pretty funny ribka, I've been using 12lb trilene for years after trying a lot of other lines that I found wanting I settled on the berkley big game 12lb for almost all of my salmon fishing from the bank. From that test I would guess that the P-line halo would be the bang for buck flourocarbon line.
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.

Offline huntnnw

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 9626
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #15 on: August 08, 2010, 07:14:07 PM »
I use seagur for steelhead, they can be line sensitive.  Salmon don't seem to mind, u could use rope  :chuckle:

Offline Dmanmastertracker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 3173
  • Location: Wet Side
    • Flickr Photo Album
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #16 on: August 08, 2010, 07:58:50 PM »
Howdy!
Just wondering if using fluorocarbon leader (for salmon) is worth the extra or is it just hype?

 Eric, they swear by it in BC and I can say up there, it was night a day difference, for some reason we got hits of fluoro and nothing on regular mono -every single year. I haven't used it as much in the Sound however but I would imagine it would work just as well.

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #17 on: August 08, 2010, 09:17:37 PM »
I wonder if it is because the water is so much clearer up there?  The waters in SE Alaska were gin clear in spots.   I'm primarily going to be fishing the big "C" a couple of times this month and next and it aint too clear.  I'm probably going to use up what I have left and tie the rest with plain old mono.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2010, 09:36:26 PM by PolarBear »

Offline WDFW Hates ME!!!

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 1932
  • Location: SW Washington
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #18 on: August 08, 2010, 09:35:16 PM »
Ok. My 2 cents. and i have been fishing a long time and have caught a crap ton of fish...

For the columbia i run 30 pound trilene big game main line and 50 pound big game leaders. I lost 2 of my favorite spinners last year on big chinook at bouy 10. Those fish don't care about line, they are still feeding...

River fishing, if i an running bobber and eggs, this year i am going with 65 pound power pro, and 25 pound flouro leaders. Heavier flouro line is better than the light stuff.

Casting plugs for river coho i run 14 pound suffix siege. Never had a roblem with it and i catch more than most.
I don't do to much drift fishing for salmon.
*censored* happens when you party naked!!!

IBEW Local 125

Offline Dmanmastertracker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 3173
  • Location: Wet Side
    • Flickr Photo Album
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #19 on: August 09, 2010, 01:34:41 PM »
I wonder if it is because the water is so much clearer up there?  The waters in SE Alaska were gin clear in spots.   I'm primarily going to be fishing the big "C" a couple of times this month and next and it aint too clear.  I'm probably going to use up what I have left and tie the rest with plain old mono.

 It is at that, at least where we fished. The rivers there run crystal clear, not like the glacial rivers of the Sound.

Offline WDFW Hates ME!!!

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 1932
  • Location: SW Washington
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #20 on: August 09, 2010, 04:04:30 PM »
PolarBear for steelhead in the columbia i use 30 pound main line and 20 pound leaders and i have never had a problem with that. I run heavy equipment because i hate to lose fish. I don't care who says what, the fish in the columbia are not leader shy.
I don't think flouro is worth the money for the columbia. When you move into the tribs i would use it.
*censored* happens when you party naked!!!

IBEW Local 125

Offline Rick

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 1858
  • Location: Everett
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #21 on: August 09, 2010, 05:24:54 PM »
Salmon and steelhead aren't line shy. If they were,they wouldn't swim into gill nets by the millions.

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #22 on: August 09, 2010, 05:54:41 PM »
PolarBear for steelhead in the columbia i use 30 pound main line and 20 pound leaders and i have never had a problem with that. I run heavy equipment because i hate to lose fish. I don't care who says what, the fish in the columbia are not leader shy.
I don't think flouro is worth the money for the columbia. When you move into the tribs i would use it.

X2 When fishing Met, Klick and Grande Ronde and water clears switch to flouro

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #23 on: August 09, 2010, 05:57:57 PM »
That's pretty funny ribka, I've been using 12lb trilene for years after trying a lot of other lines that I found wanting I settled on the berkley big game 12lb for almost all of my salmon fishing from the bank. From that test I would guess that the P-line halo would be the bang for buck flourocarbon line.

Berkely big Game is good too. Used 14 lb when  when fishing in Gulf for Reds and Sea trout. Oyster beds down there, near where fish are found, are really tough on line.

Different lines for different situations. Braid has its applications too

Offline Dmanmastertracker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 3173
  • Location: Wet Side
    • Flickr Photo Album
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #24 on: August 09, 2010, 07:28:19 PM »
Salmon and steelhead aren't line shy. If they were,they wouldn't swim into gill nets by the millions.

 Nets are entirely different, they aren't trying to eat them as far as I know.

Offline BigGoonTuna

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2418
  • Location: Yelm
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #25 on: August 09, 2010, 11:09:03 PM »
they aren't trying to eat your line either :P
you can still get gas in heaven, and a drink in kingdom come,
in the meantime, i'll be cleaning my gun

Offline Dmanmastertracker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 3173
  • Location: Wet Side
    • Flickr Photo Album
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #26 on: August 11, 2010, 09:32:44 AM »
they aren't trying to eat your line either :P

 If you rig it right, they do.

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #27 on: August 11, 2010, 12:40:34 PM »
That's called flossing!  :chuckle:

Offline Dmanmastertracker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 3173
  • Location: Wet Side
    • Flickr Photo Album
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #28 on: August 11, 2010, 02:42:50 PM »
That's called flossing!  :chuckle:

 Not that kind, I know what you mean :chuckle:.


 If you rig a hootchie, or anchovie with UV tubing, often they do go for the tubing on the line. My secret's out now, learned it from a guide in BC.

 I don't floss in river's, won't keep anything flossed. I hooked 80 fish last year on the Puke, I put back 68 of them.

Offline FC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3954
  • Location: Wa
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #29 on: August 11, 2010, 11:31:55 PM »
What is the big deal with flossing? If it's hooked in the mouth I don't see the problem.
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.

Offline BigGoonTuna

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 2418
  • Location: Yelm
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #30 on: August 11, 2010, 11:37:44 PM »
kind of defeats the point of sport fishing, which is to try and get them to bite.
you can still get gas in heaven, and a drink in kingdom come,
in the meantime, i'll be cleaning my gun

Offline PolarBear

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 10468
  • Location: Tatooine
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #31 on: August 12, 2010, 12:05:01 AM »
kind of defeats the point of sport fishing, which is to try and get them to bite.
:yeah:
Where in the hell does a guy get some stinkin' Maxima clear 40 lb leader?  I went to Cabela's, Holesnail Sports, Sunbirds even Wally World and nothing.   :dunno:  I guess that I will have to try Sportco in Fife next week and just use up the stuff from last season. 

Offline FC

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 3954
  • Location: Wa
Re: Fluorocarbon leader?
« Reply #32 on: August 12, 2010, 12:42:54 AM »
LoL and here I have spent years perfecting the art of flossing! In some rivers salmon bite well and in some they don't. Most of the rivers I fish...they don't.
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 03:21:14 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Kales15
[Today at 02:10:11 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Threewolves
[Today at 01:11:29 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 12:35:03 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]


North Peninsula Salmon Fishing by Buckhunter24
[Yesterday at 12:43:12 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal