Free: Contests & Raffles.
slips knots easily
I did give it a try last fall but noticed that it was a pain to work with and standard knots were not as reliable. Is it that much more transparent than good old clear mono?
The reason there are so many Ruger upgrades is because they're necessary.
Quote from: PolarBear on August 07, 2010, 04:56:05 PMI did give it a try last fall but noticed that it was a pain to work with and standard knots were not as reliable. Is it that much more transparent than good old clear mono?Polar yes way more transparency. Get some of the higher end ones P-Line / Seaquer. And they work just fine on the knots and tensil strength. If all possible I always try to tie palomer knots.Joe
Howdy!Just wondering if using fluorocarbon leader (for salmon) is worth the extra or is it just hype?
I wonder if it is because the water is so much clearer up there? The waters in SE Alaska were gin clear in spots. I'm primarily going to be fishing the big "C" a couple of times this month and next and it aint too clear. I'm probably going to use up what I have left and tie the rest with plain old mono.
PolarBear for steelhead in the columbia i use 30 pound main line and 20 pound leaders and i have never had a problem with that. I run heavy equipment because i hate to lose fish. I don't care who says what, the fish in the columbia are not leader shy.I don't think flouro is worth the money for the columbia. When you move into the tribs i would use it.
That's pretty funny ribka, I've been using 12lb trilene for years after trying a lot of other lines that I found wanting I settled on the berkley big game 12lb for almost all of my salmon fishing from the bank. From that test I would guess that the P-line halo would be the bang for buck flourocarbon line.
Salmon and steelhead aren't line shy. If they were,they wouldn't swim into gill nets by the millions.
they aren't trying to eat your line either
That's called flossing!
kind of defeats the point of sport fishing, which is to try and get them to bite.