collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Looking at getting a Digital Camera  (Read 3748 times)

Offline Sagedawg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 657
  • Location: Spokane
Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« on: April 01, 2008, 07:14:47 PM »
 Alright I might be set in my ways, but I think its time that I get me one of these new fangled contraptions. I dont know the first thing in what to look for. I just want to be able to point and shoot, so I can share some of what I see. What is the most important feature that is needed? Megapixels? WTH is that all about? ANY and ALL help would be most appreciated. :dunno:

  Thanks, Sage

Offline robodad

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 4437
  • Location: PA, WA.
    • frog4life !!
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2008, 07:40:05 PM »
Think of a megapixel as a piece of your picture and each time you stretch the pieces they get more and more fuzzy (blurry) now take a given size of picture (4x6, 5x7,8x10, etc...) and put as many pixels in there as possible and the result will be that each pixel won't have to be stretched as far to fill in the entire frame (4x6, 5x7, 8x10, etc...) thus clearer photos !!
The essense of freedom is the proper limitation of government !!!

Offline Bscman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 620
  • Location: Sedro Woolley
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2008, 09:57:24 PM »
Pretty much anything you can buy on todays market will AT LEAST take a clear 5x7.
More megapixels is better, but most people don't *need* what they can currently purchase.

If you're looking for the typical 4x6 printout to send to family, you don't need to get the most M/P you can....even a 2 or 3 megapixel camera will be fine.
If you care about poster size printouts, posting large pictures online, or cropping and enlarging photos for whatever else...then go for everything you can get.
I've taken some amazing pictures with an old 4 megapixel camera that printed out some pretty sharp 8x10's.

In other words, I think of megapixels as translating into how large of a paper print I can make while still keeping good clarity. More megapixels means I can print a larger picture, with great clarity.
A standard for photo's like you might see in books, the paper, whatever, is 300pixels per inch...that'll look great to the naked eye. To make a 300ppi print in 5x7, all you need is a 3megapixel camera. To get a 300ppi 8x10, though, you'll need a little more than 7megapixels.

That being said, most people are happy with a 200pixel per inch photo. This will have enough clarity for a good picture--below that and detail starts to look fuzzy or "pixelated." I consider a 200ppi print the minimum for a "good" printed picture.
A 3megapixel camera, like mentioned above, can print a 8x10 with 200ppi clarity.
The 7megapixal camera will do a 10x15 with ease. If you don't plan to print anything larger than a 10x15, you don't need a 10+ megapixel camera.

I'd guess a good 90% of todays new digitals also have some form of image stabilization...the higher the zoom, the less still you are, or the less light available, the more likely you are to get blurry pictures. Image stabilization can be a good thing, and will keep your images CLEAR in less than ideal situations.!

Zoom!
Forget "digital zoom" that means nothing. Only worry about OPTICAL zoom.
Most "pocket" cameras have 3 times zoom (3x) or a bit more. Some of the larger are up to 10x to 15x+ optical zoom. More the merrier, IMHO, keeping in mind the blur becomes a factor at high zoom (you'll need a tripod or a camer with good image stabilization. A poor quality lense will look "fuzzy" at high zoom).
I say get the most OPTICAL zoom you can, or at least the most you can get with the size of camera you desire.

The larger the lense (typically) the clearer and brighter your images will be. Tiny pocket cameras tend to be a bit darker, and don't get the colors just right. The larger cameras with better glass do a much better job--but at added expense of size, and weight.
Again, go for the biggest/highest quality you can, or are willing to lug around.

I hope this helps a little. That's my "basic" guide for a decent digital camera....though I'll admit, I'm far from camera savvy.

I posted this pic before, but some people really liked it so maybe it'll help. This should show you what a CHEAP digital camera is capable of. This was an older kodak (3yrs old I think) with 4 megapixels and 5x optical zoom--paid $199 at the time. A similar camera today is likely ~$140-160. This picture was also cropped to about 35% the size it originally was--so you can imagine how large you could get a good, clear print with only 4megapixels.
« Last Edit: April 01, 2008, 10:13:40 PM by Bscman »
I left it better than I found it...did you?
I hunt animals because veggies are too easy to stalk.

Offline Hornseeker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3097
    • Sapphire Traditional Archery
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2008, 07:40:20 AM »
After Himming and Hawing for probably 6 months now, I pulled the trigger this morning. I have been shooting an older Olympus ultra zoom with 4mp for about 4 years now. I was real happy with it, but it was getting old.

This morning I ordered a Canon S5IS. Its a great cam and for about $315 right now its a screamin deal. 12 power zoom, 8 mp, and fantastic ergonomics. Very user friendly. Also has a hot shoe to mount an external flash to for great indoor work or low light conditions... PLUS.. and this is a big one for me, it has a stellar movie mode...takes great movies. Cool thing too...you can zoom in and out while in movie mode...PLUS...while taking pics, there is  a separate button to start movies, so you dont have to switch modes... Then...while actually filming footage, you can snap still photos... Pretty awesome.... stereo sound too..

Anyhow... the best bang for your buck right now... is this camera, or the Panasonic FZ18 or the Panny FZ8 or the Olympus SP560uz... There are MANY more options...but it is widely accepted that for point and shoots with the ultra zooms (12-18X) these are the ones...

good LUck
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"

Offline jackelope

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50199
  • Location: Duvall, WA
  • Groups: jackelope
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2008, 01:00:57 PM »
i himmed and hawed for 2 or 3 weeks between the s5is and the fz18 and finally decided on the fz18 panasonic. i truly don't think you can go wrong with either of them. i chose the fz because of the 18x zoom, but i no longer believe that should be a deciding factor.
for $400, you can't go wrong with any of the point and shoot ultra-zooms, they are all right around the $400 mark.
:fire.:

" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield

My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum

Offline Slider

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2585
    • www.albinovest.com
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #5 on: April 06, 2008, 04:47:55 PM »
My buddy just asked me what to get. I steered him towards the FZ18 for the same reason as Jackelope!!! The Canon is also a very good camera!!! You will be very happy!!!

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #6 on: April 06, 2008, 05:23:37 PM »
My vote was for the FZ18.  I'm not sure how many folks I have talked into it.  I wish I had a commision from Panny for each one.  90% of the pics you see on here from me are with it.  Its small and takes great shots.  I also own what I consider a high end camera, a Canon 40D.  Now I just need better glass.  There are some shots that I am amazed that I get with a point ans shoot camera.  I ama  canon fan and am amazed with my Panny.  Another vote for either one of those two cameras.  I think they outclass the Olympus, but thats my  :twocents:.  If you are after a point and shoot, then I would consider those two.  If you want mostly outdoor stuff i would take advantage of the Pannys 18 power zoom.  If you are wanting one for more indoor or family stuff, I would go withthe Canon hornseeker got.  its zoom is adequate for great outdoor shots as well, just as the Panny has a decent flash for family, but a hto shoe would be better. 

Offline gramps

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 795
  • Location: SE Wa.
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #7 on: April 06, 2008, 08:32:20 PM »
Bone..you and a couple others convinced me to buy one...need the time to play now.   
It never changes, but it is always different.

Offline ICEMAN

  • Site Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 15575
  • Location: Olympia
  • The opinionated one... Y.A.R. Exec. Staff
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #8 on: April 07, 2008, 06:10:46 AM »
How about water? My olympus is waterproof, and I have always worried about carrying non-waterproof cameras... My olympus is getting a bit old, and am interested in upping my zoom capability.
molṑn labé

A Knuckle Draggin Neanderthal Meat Head

Kill your television....do it now.....

Don't make me hurt you.

“I don't feel we did wrong in taking this great country away from them. There were great numbers of people who needed new land, and the Indians were selfishly trying to keep it for themselves.”  John Wayne

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #9 on: April 07, 2008, 03:42:31 PM »
waterproof, water resistant and stay the hell away from water.  I think they both tend to be the latter.  There are waterproof cameras out there, but none of them get the great shots that I KNOW of.  I don't know of any quality glass, or electronics that are waterproof.

Offline Wea300mag

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 5433
  • Location: Sedro Woolley
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #10 on: April 07, 2008, 05:32:21 PM »
Another vote for the Panasonic FZ18 here, I love the zoom. I use an Olympus at work and like the FZ18 better.
Keep your nose in the wind and your eyes on the skyline

Offline Sagedawg

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 657
  • Location: Spokane
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #11 on: April 08, 2008, 05:40:51 PM »
Hey guys thanks for all the info. Im going to go looking this weekend but now I have an idea on what to look for .


Thanks, Sage

Offline LOVEMYLABXS

  • Retired
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 540
  • Location: Davenport
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2008, 03:00:40 PM »
Sage don't know what your budget is but i just picked up the Kodak Z812 and for me it's just the right size to be handy enough to have with ya and it's 8 meg pixel with 12 power zoom. Cost was 200
Scratch a dog once and you'll have a job for life and life is good.....  Mike

Offline LOVEMYLABXS

  • Retired
  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 540
  • Location: Davenport
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2008, 03:03:14 PM »
One more overcast day was shooting for the 2 ducks by the last trees but didn't get the zoom fast enough but liked how it turned out anyways
Scratch a dog once and you'll have a job for life and life is good.....  Mike

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Looking at getting a Digital Camera
« Reply #14 on: April 14, 2008, 03:49:08 PM »
Great picture even without the ducks.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Norway pass Elk by Dark2Dark
[Yesterday at 11:51:46 PM]


Bear behavior by lewy
[Yesterday at 11:51:23 PM]


FFL preferences or warnings in Olympia or south Sound area? by Platensek-po
[Yesterday at 11:39:03 PM]


Boat registration by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 10:22:29 PM]


Norway Pass Archery Elk 2025 by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 09:14:45 PM]


Entiat Quality tag by WAcoueshunter
[Yesterday at 09:05:06 PM]


Idaho 2025 Controlled Hunts by JDArms1240
[Yesterday at 09:03:40 PM]


Palouse/Mica (GMU 127) Access for Trades Work by dr.derek
[Yesterday at 08:29:53 PM]


Pearygin Quality by MADMAX
[Yesterday at 07:55:09 PM]


Teanaway bull elk by Caveman123
[Yesterday at 07:43:44 PM]


Oregon results posted. by Caveman123
[Yesterday at 07:40:47 PM]


2025 Draw Results by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 07:27:32 PM]


Mudflow Archery by Yeti419
[Yesterday at 07:26:25 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by dilleytech
[Yesterday at 07:14:35 PM]


Rehome for GWP by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 06:43:07 PM]


Vashon Island deer tag by bowhunter_1
[Yesterday at 04:32:43 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal