Free: Contests & Raffles.
IcemanDidn't you get some hunter harrassment from a uniform while hunting turkeys here in the spring?
The place I hunt has a parcell of land owned by two Veterinarians, their land borders the road on both side. They have posted no trespass, no hunting, no guns signs on the road about 20 yards before their prop. starts. The surrounding land is owned by the city of Everett, and is open to the public to almost all outdoor activities except mush. picking and horses/ cars. The couple owns and keeps horses on the land, lets the 3 big dogs run wild, and tries to tell us we can't walk the public road, they have gone as far as to follow us in their car until we leave the road onto our trail. 1. Would any or all of this fall under harassment?2. Am I wrong in assuming they have no rights to the road as far as public foot traffic?
Today the WDFW put out a bulletin suggesting that hikers wear blaze orange, familiarize themselves with hunting seasons and to make noise like singing, whistling or loud talk to alert hunters to their presence. Sounds like an invitation to harass hunters and scare game without penalty complements of the WDFW.
RCW 77.15.210Obstructing the taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife — Penalty. (1) A person is guilty of obstructing the taking of fish[, shellfish,] or wildlife if the person: (a) Harasses, drives, or disturbs fish, shellfish, or wildlife with the intent of disrupting lawful pursuit or taking thereof; or (b) Harasses, intimidates, or interferes with an individual engaged in the lawful taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife or lawful predator control with the intent of disrupting lawful pursuit or taking thereof. (2) Obstructing the taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife is a gross misdemeanor. (3) It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution for obstructing the taking of fish, shellfish, or wildlife that the person charged was: (a) Interfering with a person engaged in hunting outside the legally established hunting season; or (b) Preventing or attempting to prevent unauthorized trespass on private property. (4) The person raising a defense under subsection (3) of this section has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence.