collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels  (Read 48320 times)

Offline predatorpro

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1719
  • Location: Wenatchee, WA
Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« on: March 27, 2012, 11:57:19 AM »
so i have been wondering what really are the beneffits of a bull barrel and how much of a difference do they really make? does anyone have any knowledge on this subject? and what do you prefer?

Offline jaymark6655

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 1911
  • Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #1 on: March 27, 2012, 12:09:34 PM »
They have some interesting benefits and drawbacks.

They take longer to heat up, so the rifle can shoot several rounds before the point of impact changes.  However, they take forever to cool down.

The shift weight forward and make shooting offhand easier, but they weight more and will tire you out when hiking around.

When firing barrels vibrate, the thicker barrel dampens this vibration and makes it more consistent.  This makes them more accurate.

That is about all I can think of.
20 Zardoz Points!

"That's the reason we pay $25 for a recoil lug made by a professional instead of one for $0.50 made by Micheal J Fox using a dremel!"

"Women should be treated the same as a French Rifle, dropped at the first sign of trouble."

"Fair is a meaningless word taught to young children."

Offline JPhelps

  • I EAT ELK!!!
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 2898
  • Location: Pe Ell
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #2 on: March 27, 2012, 12:13:17 PM »
Bull barrels are more rigid making them more accurate (not as much flex).  A shorter barrel is more accurate than a long barrel of the same diameter all things considered.  That's why when the barrels start getting longer they start getting thicker.

Offline predatorpro

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Posts: 1719
  • Location: Wenatchee, WA
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #3 on: March 27, 2012, 01:04:31 PM »
thanks for the info guys! i have a cz 550 varmint with a laminated stock and a 26 inch bull barrel chambered in 22-250 ....i have been contemplating getting a tikka t3 in a 22-250 too, and i hear they are extremely accurate also, that or pay $1400 for carbon fiber barrel...lol, essentially i just want a light gun that doesnt wear me out hiking around...

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #4 on: March 27, 2012, 03:38:26 PM »
Unless you sit over dog towns, you won't need a bull......and if you do, you might give the 223ai a peek. A sporter weight rifle can produce great accuracy in a 22cf.

Instead of buying a carbon barrel, just go light a couple c notes on fire....it wont hurt as bad and you can use the left over cash to buy a good barrel.

Offline Bofire

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 5524
  • Location: Yelm
  • Harley YAR YAR YAR!
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #5 on: March 27, 2012, 04:53:04 PM »
The Tikka Varmit is a bit over 8 lbs, about 4-5 lbs lighter than a rem 700 varmit.
Carl
I still do not like heavy barrel guns for my uses.
When the chips are down..... the buffalo is empty!!

I do not shop at Amazon

Offline Hornseeker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Posts: 3097
    • Sapphire Traditional Archery
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #6 on: March 28, 2012, 06:08:09 AM »
There are also a lot of different barrel contours that are "in between" sporter and full bull... I dont know what they are called, but some just have a less aggressive taper....
Chuck Norris puts the "Laughter" in "Manslaughter"

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #7 on: March 28, 2012, 01:48:06 PM »
 a .65 at the muzzle barrel in .224 leaves over .200" around the bullet. that same figure would be equal to dang near 3/4" at the muzzle ona 308.

Offline gadwall

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 410
  • Location: Eastern WA
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #8 on: March 28, 2012, 08:38:20 PM »
I bought a winchester model 70 Laredo LRH in 7mm mag in 1996.  It weighs 11 pounds loaded, including the scope.  I have packed it for many miles in mule deer country and I shoot it quite a bit.  I spent alot of time after I bought it working up a load and it shoots 3 shots in less than 1/2 inch at 100.  I would shoot 600 at a big bull or a big muley with that rifle as a matter of personal confidence.  I bought it because I can't shoot a lightweight rifle as well over the long haul.  Everyone has their likes and dislikes.  I happen to shoot better with the heavyweights.
Duck Buster
Mule Deer Hunter
Turkey Camp Cook
Time in the outdoors is a privilege to be shared with our families and friends

Offline demontang

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2008
  • Posts: 3412
  • Location: Selah
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #9 on: March 28, 2012, 08:51:40 PM »
Or just have your bull fluted. Best of both worlds, cools fast is lighter then a full contour and even looks good .02

Offline jaymark6655

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 1911
  • Location: Fredericksburg, VA
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #10 on: March 28, 2012, 09:03:18 PM »
Or go with a VTR and that triangle barrel.  Still trying to figure that one out.

"...the triangular cross-section provides the maximum surface area for a given enclosed volume. This accounts for the Remington heat dissipation claim / feature. Removing the mass along the central axis leaves the mass in the three corners at a maximum distance from the central axis. This maximizes the axial compression rigidity and the torsional rigidity, also a Remington claim / feature. The torsional rigidity promotes stability under the influence of the rifling twist, a special benefit in a rifle barrel. Flexural stiffness is optimal for downward bending of the muzzle end in the orientation Remington uses in the stock; one corner up and two corners down. That puts the top corner in tension and the bottom corners in compression, where buckling concerns reduce the allowable load-carrying capacity ."
20 Zardoz Points!

"That's the reason we pay $25 for a recoil lug made by a professional instead of one for $0.50 made by Micheal J Fox using a dremel!"

"Women should be treated the same as a French Rifle, dropped at the first sign of trouble."

"Fair is a meaningless word taught to young children."

Offline addicted

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 5300
  • Location: A forest near you
  • The famous FootDog
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2012, 01:59:53 PM »
Shortly after I bought a remington 700 CDL stainless fluted .223 my friend bought a sps bull barrel .223.  These guns were raised as sisters, always going out to play together and sometimes having sleep overs in eachothers safe's while their corresponding dad was off deployed.

They both had big scopes on them and loved to shoot small things, big things, close things, and far things, but my girl the fluted CDL always had to stop and cool down after a half dozen quick shots where her friend the SPS with the bull barrel got to shoot all day long without a care in the world.

So I sold my girl and my next .223 is going to have a bull barrel because .223 ammo is just too cheap to shoot slow.

next one is also going to have 1:7 or 8 twist cuz not being able to shoot over 55 grains sucks. 
"Right now, I am thinking that If my grandmother was here, she would be lecturing me about how there are poor people in Africa, that would just love to have a Ruger, I would just say "Great, granny, lets just ship all the Rugers to Africa!"


Loving life in the Great Northwest one day at a time.

It sounds like it's time to get a new gun.

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Bull Barrels vs. Standard Barrels
« Reply #12 on: March 29, 2012, 06:03:07 PM »
a .65 at the muzzle barrel in .224 leaves over .200" around the bullet. that same figure would be equal to dang near 3/4" at the muzzle ona 308.
 

For another reference, a Rem Sendero is .820 at the muzzle.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal