Free: Contests & Raffles.
I’m more bothered by antlerless harvest. No idea if that still includes that, but you have antlerless harvest for 65 and older antlerless harvest for 18 and under, antlerless harvest for veterans, antlerless harvest for disability, antlerless harvest for those with covid, antlerless harvest for all the illegals that were separated at the border, antlerless harvest for….And then second, and third and maybe now fourth tags. Mind blown.
...and no tags sold
I can’t believe the sentiment of hunters and the ammo we continue to give Wdfw and /or antis to shut down all hunting opportunity. Blows my mind!!When not just start a petition to take away all opportunities…….period??!!What is the success rate in the late archery??? Anyone take the time to look? What’s the difference between someone that filled tags in the early season vs someone that wants to fill them in the late season. And for curious minds…..121 late archery is “buck only”, no youth does, no 65 / older does, no dissolved does, no special permit does and no second deer tags given out. For heavens sakes guys…..stop giving the anti hunting group, to include our Wdfw more ammo to shut things down. If you want to chase deer in the late season have at it. If you want it shut down, do your part and stop hunting in the general season too.
I don't disagree that something needs to be done, but to just pick a user group and suggest that is the problem and will fix our deer numbers is a false narrative. If that was the case and we thought eliminating one of the the user groups opportunity....we should just eliminate all rifle hunting seasons being that is the largest user group that hands down kills the majority of animals.....maybe not from a percentage standpoint but definitely as it pertains to total number of deer being shot. From now on, Washington should be a primitive weapon state. I would vote for that long before I ever agree to giving up more opportunity. Less animals would be killed and at least the tradition of hunting with family and friends would remain intact. I understand what you saying about 121 and the blue tongue damage this year. Reality is the late bow season will not change how long it takes these deer to recover. The deer that died from blue tongue are....well dead. The ones that weren't effected are very healthy and very much alive. The pressure of bow hunters will undoubtedly be the same as it has been every year during this hunt. Less animals will be killed due to the smaller number of animals to harvest. The sun will rise and fall and next year will bring a new hunting season. Harvest numbers will remain low as the heard rebuilds and with any luck and a little bit of actual give a F&*& from out game department, we will have a healthy heard again in the years to come. As a disclaimer:::I also rifle hunt so my suggestion of taking away that user groups opportunity is said in gest. I also spend about 25-35% of my year in 121 and have not seen the decline of numbers in my general area. Our heard has remained very healthy and strong. Our does are as fat as they have been and we have had a great fawn year with most does having twins. I see the predator problem in 121 being a far bigger problem than any hunting. I have at least 5-6 cougars that roam my property throughout the year and have pictures of at least 18 different bears this spring. We have killed 4 bears off the property and it won't put a dent in the population....OHHHHH AND NOW THERE IS NO SPRING SEASON FOR 2022!!! Where does the problem lie?? At the end of the day, I am tired of surrendering opportunity to out state because we feel a few bow hunters are going to kill all the deer.....that simply is not the case. If people were truly that concerned, blue tongue was in full swing long before the rifle season started....and the locals would not have shot the buck they did, to then now be appalled that bow hunters now get to hunt a season that has existed for a decade or longer.