the reason why there's not much wolf attacks in north America is because wolves haven't been around populated areas for a very long time. do some research on wolf attacks in Russia and other places where people and wolves "coexist"
But we don't live in Russia, we live in America, and our wolves are not Eurasian wolves. That's the argument you'll get.
It's not me that you need to convince. I'm beginning to question just how much wolves in western WA will really have an impact on public opinion outside of livestock owners and hunters.
Like I've said, you can bet that timber companies will welcome wolves on their lands to keep deer and elk in check and my gut feeling is most people won't care one way or another whether wolves are there or not. It's not like mountain lions, coyotes, and bear walking through towns like La Center or Seattle is unheard of nor are attacks on pets and people by those.
Unless wolves start picking off hunters, loggers, hikers, campers, mountain bikers etc I suspect the majority of the public will remain largely indifferent. If we had more of a hunting culture in this state it might be a different story. But I just don't see it. Pit bulls and child molesters are a bigger concern to most folks.
Hirshey had a close call and thank God it didn't turn out worse. But I guarantee most people will hear that story and say "so?" and point to cougar and bear attacks that led to someone getting hurt or even killed. It doesn't matter that wolves haven't been here for 70 years, people have a short memory and watch "Never Cry Wolf."
They aren't listening. I don't think that's right, but it's a fact.
