Free: Contests & Raffles.
I dumped Sitka and jumped on Kuiu when they first came out. I think I've spent something like $2,500 on Kuiu, but that's with 2 complete packs, an extra chugach for the wife, duplicates of the neck gaiter, beanie, and 185 top in Verde, and 3 other pairs of attack pants, so I'd think you'd still be well under your budget. I just added all the Kuiu stuff to the cart again and it's $1,560 for the stuff below. If you keep an eye on the outlet, or buy when they're doing sales and stuff though you can knock that down quite a bit too. I got an Outlet Guide Jacket for $140, Chugach set on sale for $100 off, Spindrift on sale for $115, Attacks on sale for $120, Guide gloves on sale for $35, Beanie one sale for $15. So that'd be like $300 less than what the cart says, if you can catch stuff on sale or in the outlet. This was almost all in 2011 though, so I don't know if they'll keep doing those kinds of deals or not. The outlet is still a good place to snag stuff for cheap though. I bought a Chugach jacket from the outlet, and it had a pen mark on the sleeve cuff that I had to look to see, so it was like way less than a new one. The outlet stuff is still good stuff, there's nothing functionally wrong with it. There are Chugach pants on there right now for $100 less than new and the older style Guide Jackets without the dual chest pockets and the sleeve pocket for $50 off.I use Kuiu (all in Vias):Merino Neck GaitorMerino Beanie185 Zip T top250 Zip T topSpindrift JacketGuide VestGuide JacketChugach JacketUsually Red Ram merino boxers, if I do long underwear on my legs it's also the Kuiu merinoAttack PantsChugach PantsSmart Wool socksLowa Uplander GTX bootsGuide GloveFor archery last year, I never used the long bottoms, the 250 top, the guide jacket, the gloves, the spindrift, or either of the chugach pieces, though I still took both of those.
Quote from: SGTDuffman on April 08, 2013, 06:00:08 PMI dumped Sitka and jumped on Kuiu when they first came out. I think I've spent something like $2,500 on Kuiu, but that's with 2 complete packs, an extra chugach for the wife, duplicates of the neck gaiter, beanie, and 185 top in Verde, and 3 other pairs of attack pants, so I'd think you'd still be well under your budget. I just added all the Kuiu stuff to the cart again and it's $1,560 for the stuff below. If you keep an eye on the outlet, or buy when they're doing sales and stuff though you can knock that down quite a bit too. I got an Outlet Guide Jacket for $140, Chugach set on sale for $100 off, Spindrift on sale for $115, Attacks on sale for $120, Guide gloves on sale for $35, Beanie one sale for $15. So that'd be like $300 less than what the cart says, if you can catch stuff on sale or in the outlet. This was almost all in 2011 though, so I don't know if they'll keep doing those kinds of deals or not. The outlet is still a good place to snag stuff for cheap though. I bought a Chugach jacket from the outlet, and it had a pen mark on the sleeve cuff that I had to look to see, so it was like way less than a new one. The outlet stuff is still good stuff, there's nothing functionally wrong with it. There are Chugach pants on there right now for $100 less than new and the older style Guide Jackets without the dual chest pockets and the sleeve pocket for $50 off.I use Kuiu (all in Vias):Merino Neck GaitorMerino Beanie185 Zip T top250 Zip T topSpindrift JacketGuide VestGuide JacketChugach JacketUsually Red Ram merino boxers, if I do long underwear on my legs it's also the Kuiu merinoAttack PantsChugach PantsSmart Wool socksLowa Uplander GTX bootsGuide GloveFor archery last year, I never used the long bottoms, the 250 top, the guide jacket, the gloves, the spindrift, or either of the chugach pieces, though I still took both of those.Wow, thanks for all the input. Much appreciated. I'm definitely hoping to end up with some Kuiu gear. I think that for base layers Kuiu and First lite are top of the line. I went with the First Lite because of two reasons. First, the thumbholes in the sleeves were huge for me, as was the length of the tail. I'm 6'4 with long arms and I hate shirt riding up while I'm hiking or sleeves that won't stay down. I went first light all the way to the heavy vest. I'm not sure what I'll do yet for the thick, puffy insulating layer or the outer layer.
Funny the way different gear fits different people. I am not a huge fan of thumbholes in clothes.
If I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope.
Quote from: wilsongideon on April 09, 2013, 06:46:56 PMIf I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope. You going to hunt naked?
Quote from: wilsongideon on April 09, 2013, 06:46:56 PMIf I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope. Absolutely. I hunt in carharts more often than not. I love the higher end stuff and have some of it, but wearing 2k in clothing sounds ridiculous. Optics on the other hand... That will increase your odds significantly.
Quote from: sirmissalot on April 09, 2013, 09:38:19 PMQuote from: wilsongideon on April 09, 2013, 06:46:56 PMIf I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope. Absolutely. I hunt in carharts more often than not. I love the higher end stuff and have some of it, but wearing 2k in clothing sounds ridiculous. Optics on the other hand... That will increase your odds significantly.What happens when you're soaked in your carharts and can't hunt and it takes 2 days to dry them out? Disclaimer: I don't own $2k in clothing or expensive optics. Just the best I can afford.
I can't bring myself to spend big money on optics. I have Vortex Viper HD's and I spent half a day in Cbaela's manhandling all of the big name stuff, looking through Zeiss and Swaro's. I was hard pressed to find any meaningful difference between them, and certainly didn't see $1,500-2,000 worth of difference. I figure what I saved on optics more than paid for my clothes.
Myself personally, I buy what I feel is the best piece of gear for my needs reguardless of brand. Quality, durability, fit, and comfort are what I base my choices on, not price. I've got some of nearly everything mentioned above. Sitka builds a jacket that I think is unbeatable, while First Lite has some of the best base layers. Kuiu's superdown insulating jacket is by far the best piece I've added recently. As far as camo patterns go, I personally like to mix/match them. I feel the overall break-up is better.
Quote from: jackelope on April 09, 2013, 09:45:07 PMQuote from: sirmissalot on April 09, 2013, 09:38:19 PMQuote from: wilsongideon on April 09, 2013, 06:46:56 PMIf I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope. Absolutely. I hunt in carharts more often than not. I love the higher end stuff and have some of it, but wearing 2k in clothing sounds ridiculous. Optics on the other hand... That will increase your odds significantly.What happens when you're soaked in your carharts and can't hunt and it takes 2 days to dry them out? Disclaimer: I don't own $2k in clothing or expensive optics. Just the best I can afford.No offense to the poster here who hunts in carharts, that's great. But you obviously do a different type of hunting then one that would require an expensive layering system. I know I plan on spending 8 days in a wilderness area this year, and when you do that, you could get away with carharts, but it's not going to be very much fun. I'm there to hunt, and enjoy myself. If I go with sub par gear, and a situation arises that I wish I had better gear, that effects the whole hunt, and takes away from what I'm trying to accomplish. I'm not saying what you're doing is wrong, but I don't think I would blast a group of people for wanting high end gear because YOU don't think it's necessary. Tell me how your carharts are going to be wearing on day 4 when you've woken up to 6 inches of snow, then it rains all morning, followed by sun and 60 in the afternoon.Again, I know you can hunt with cheaper gear, I've done it. But I can also tell you from experience, I couldn't wait to upgrade.Welcome to Washington...
Quote from: jackelope on April 09, 2013, 09:45:07 PMQuote from: sirmissalot on April 09, 2013, 09:38:19 PMQuote from: wilsongideon on April 09, 2013, 06:46:56 PMIf I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope. Absolutely. I hunt in carharts more often than not. I love the higher end stuff and have some of it, but wearing 2k in clothing sounds ridiculous. Optics on the other hand... That will increase your odds significantly.What happens when you're soaked in your carharts and can't hunt and it takes 2 days to dry them out? Disclaimer: I don't own $2k in clothing or expensive optics. Just the best I can afford.If its raining I probably wouldn't be wearing carharts. Also Carharts don't take 2 days to dry out I don't remember saying carharts are the answer, I just said I wear them more often than my Sitka gortex stuff. That stuff is always in my pack, and when I need it I throw it on. (over my carharts ) When I don't, I take it off.
Quote from: jackelope on April 09, 2013, 09:45:07 PMQuote from: sirmissalot on April 09, 2013, 09:38:19 PMQuote from: wilsongideon on April 09, 2013, 06:46:56 PMIf I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope. Absolutely. I hunt in carharts more often than not. I love the higher end stuff and have some of it, but wearing 2k in clothing sounds ridiculous. Optics on the other hand... That will increase your odds significantly.What happens when you're soaked in your carharts and can't hunt and it takes 2 days to dry them out? Disclaimer: I don't own $2k in clothing or expensive optics. Just the best I can afford.If its raining I probably wouldn't be wearing carharts. Also Carharts don't take 2 days to dry out I don't remember saying carharts are the answer, I just said I wear them more often than my Sitka gortex stuff. That stuff is always in my pack, and when I need it I throw it on. (over my carharts ) When I don't, I take it off. Quote from: SilkOnTheWetSide on April 10, 2013, 06:25:21 AMQuote from: jackelope on April 09, 2013, 09:45:07 PMQuote from: sirmissalot on April 09, 2013, 09:38:19 PMQuote from: wilsongideon on April 09, 2013, 06:46:56 PMIf I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope. Absolutely. I hunt in carharts more often than not. I love the higher end stuff and have some of it, but wearing 2k in clothing sounds ridiculous. Optics on the other hand... That will increase your odds significantly.What happens when you're soaked in your carharts and can't hunt and it takes 2 days to dry them out? Disclaimer: I don't own $2k in clothing or expensive optics. Just the best I can afford.No offense to the poster here who hunts in carharts, that's great. But you obviously do a different type of hunting then one that would require an expensive layering system. I know I plan on spending 8 days in a wilderness area this year, and when you do that, you could get away with carharts, but it's not going to be very much fun. I'm there to hunt, and enjoy myself. If I go with sub par gear, and a situation arises that I wish I had better gear, that effects the whole hunt, and takes away from what I'm trying to accomplish. I'm not saying what you're doing is wrong, but I don't think I would blast a group of people for wanting high end gear because YOU don't think it's necessary. Tell me how your carharts are going to be wearing on day 4 when you've woken up to 6 inches of snow, then it rains all morning, followed by sun and 60 in the afternoon.Again, I know you can hunt with cheaper gear, I've done it. But I can also tell you from experience, I couldn't wait to upgrade.Welcome to Washington... SFI'm trying trying to blast anyone? I just think $2k in brand new clothing sounds ridiculous, especially when you're just talking about all this fancy brand stuff, if you were including some good wool for late season stuff, I'd agree a little more. I own Sitka, Kuiu, first lite, as well as many other lower end brands, including carharts. I simply gave my input of what I normally wear. Not trying to be a know it all, because I certainly don't. Its not uncommon for me to have to hear about my fancy optics, some guys choose to hunt with Nikon or Bushnell. I don't!
Quote from: sirmissalot on April 10, 2013, 08:51:52 AMQuote from: jackelope on April 09, 2013, 09:45:07 PMQuote from: sirmissalot on April 09, 2013, 09:38:19 PMQuote from: wilsongideon on April 09, 2013, 06:46:56 PMIf I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope. Absolutely. I hunt in carharts more often than not. I love the higher end stuff and have some of it, but wearing 2k in clothing sounds ridiculous. Optics on the other hand... That will increase your odds significantly.What happens when you're soaked in your carharts and can't hunt and it takes 2 days to dry them out? Disclaimer: I don't own $2k in clothing or expensive optics. Just the best I can afford.If its raining I probably wouldn't be wearing carharts. Also Carharts don't take 2 days to dry out I don't remember saying carharts are the answer, I just said I wear them more often than my Sitka gortex stuff. That stuff is always in my pack, and when I need it I throw it on. (over my carharts ) When I don't, I take it off. Quote from: SilkOnTheWetSide on April 10, 2013, 06:25:21 AMQuote from: jackelope on April 09, 2013, 09:45:07 PMQuote from: sirmissalot on April 09, 2013, 09:38:19 PMQuote from: wilsongideon on April 09, 2013, 06:46:56 PMIf I had two thousand dollars Id put it towards a spotting scope. Absolutely. I hunt in carharts more often than not. I love the higher end stuff and have some of it, but wearing 2k in clothing sounds ridiculous. Optics on the other hand... That will increase your odds significantly.What happens when you're soaked in your carharts and can't hunt and it takes 2 days to dry them out? Disclaimer: I don't own $2k in clothing or expensive optics. Just the best I can afford.No offense to the poster here who hunts in carharts, that's great. But you obviously do a different type of hunting then one that would require an expensive layering system. I know I plan on spending 8 days in a wilderness area this year, and when you do that, you could get away with carharts, but it's not going to be very much fun. I'm there to hunt, and enjoy myself. If I go with sub par gear, and a situation arises that I wish I had better gear, that effects the whole hunt, and takes away from what I'm trying to accomplish. I'm not saying what you're doing is wrong, but I don't think I would blast a group of people for wanting high end gear because YOU don't think it's necessary. Tell me how your carharts are going to be wearing on day 4 when you've woken up to 6 inches of snow, then it rains all morning, followed by sun and 60 in the afternoon.Again, I know you can hunt with cheaper gear, I've done it. But I can also tell you from experience, I couldn't wait to upgrade.Welcome to Washington... SFI'm trying trying to blast anyone? I just think $2k in brand new clothing sounds ridiculous, especially when you're just talking about all this fancy brand stuff, if you were including some good wool for late season stuff, I'd agree a little more. I own Sitka, Kuiu, first lite, as well as many other lower end brands, including carharts. I simply gave my input of what I normally wear. Not trying to be a know it all, because I certainly don't. Its not uncommon for me to have to hear about my fancy optics, some guys choose to hunt with Nikon or Bushnell. I don't!Again, i'm not trying to be combative, but you get what you pay for. From the looks of your profile picture you do just fine.