collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: restriction to possess firearms  (Read 10325 times)

Offline RifleRidge

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 363
  • Location: Amboy, WA
restriction to possess firearms
« on: June 29, 2013, 06:26:57 PM »
A good buddy of ours was found with a few firearms and now is facing charges. He says he was not aware of the restriction since he thought he had his rights restored through the courts.

Any suggestions, ideas, comments or good Attorneys that will fight cases like this?

« Last Edit: June 29, 2013, 06:39:22 PM by RifleRidge »

Offline wariner87

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Apr 2013
  • Posts: 259
  • Location: federal way
  • STRIKE FIRST STRIKE FAST
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2013, 06:36:15 PM »
He thought he had them restored ?
#Lifteachotherup # I have awaken # nobody cares. Work harder. Nobody is more enslaved then those who believe they are free.

Offline Gobble Doc

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 2680
  • Location: Snohomish, WA
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2013, 07:09:16 PM »
Is this like getting a felony quashed?

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4623
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2013, 07:18:16 PM »
There are different ways this can happen.  If he/she was convicted of a felony as an adult, then they are disqualified from owning/possessing a firearm.  After a period of time, they can petition the court to restore their rights to possess a firearm.  Some states do this automatically once you clear probation.  Others you have to actively file the petition after X number of years of staying out of trouble.

If you were convicted of a felony as a juvenile, then the court can seal the records and expunge it from your criminal history.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline RifleRidge

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 363
  • Location: Amboy, WA
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #4 on: June 29, 2013, 07:39:45 PM »
Misdemeanor Crime of Domestic Violence back in 1996... No felony charges up until now or if he is proven quality

Offline JLS

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 4623
  • Location: In my last tracks.....
  • Groups: Support the LWCF!
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #5 on: June 29, 2013, 07:45:56 PM »
Misdemeanor Crime of Domestic Violence back in 1996... No felony charges up until now or if he is proven quality

DV assault is same as felony in regards to the process.
Matthew 7:13-14

Offline RifleRidge

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 363
  • Location: Amboy, WA
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #6 on: June 29, 2013, 07:49:52 PM »
Thank you. Now with all that said, Again, Any suggestions, ideas, comments or good Attorneys that will fight cases like this?

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8828
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #7 on: June 29, 2013, 07:54:10 PM »
What the ATF says about it. 
http://www.atf.gov/firearms/faq/misdemeanor-domestic-violence.html

Any Court expungment must specifically return the firearm rights to the individual.  I can see now haw somebody could run afoul of the law here.

Your friend needs to read carefully that this does in fact apply to him
Quote
was committed by a current or former spouse, parent, or guardian of the victim, by a person with whom the victim shares a child in common, by a person who is cohabiting with or has cohabited with the victim as a spouse, parent, or guardian, or by a person similarly situated to a spouse, parent, or guardian of the victim.

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6221
  • Location: Toledo
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #8 on: June 29, 2013, 08:09:56 PM »
I know a person that went through this about 14 or 15 years ago. It cost him $150   He didnt even know he wasnt able to posess firearms. His violation was in 95 or 96 too. Same thing. DV. Wasnt a law against him posessing firearms then. It was a few years later when I believe the Brady bill was enacted that ended up being retroactive to include him. I'm kind of surprised that they could legally do this. And it hasnt been challenged in the courts. Its almost a double jeopardy type of thing. He was convicted. Sentenced and payed for his crime. Then a few years later it was like another sentence was handed out with out even telling him. Kind of low if you ask me.

Here is how it was explained to him. This is a catch 22 situation. You can do a restoration of rights. Which will allow you to possesss firearms again. It can be pretty cheap and simple. Have an atty. draw up the paperwork and submit it. Your probably good to go. Especially if the clerks in the agency do a good job of removing it from your records. 

The crazy part is that this is not the same as having your rights restored on a federal level. Thats way harder to do.And way more involved. Technically if a federal agent runs a check on him and finds the previous charges, he could be charged with a felony. He might be OK in that situation if he has a copy of his restoration of rights and the federal officer is having a good day. Or he might be facing charges if that officer is having a bad day.

The person I know has gone through several NICS checks since, and all but the first 1 cleared no problem. He was denied on the first one and thats what got it all started. The thing is,when he got denied it started about a 6 month process of finding out why he was denied. And what to do. When you are denied on a NICS check. They just tell you the reporting agency. You have to contact them. Find out what is on your record that would be cause for denial. Submit it to NICS and follow their procedures. It wasnt difficult. But it was time consuming.
« Last Edit: June 29, 2013, 08:40:16 PM by HntnFsh »

Offline HntnFsh

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 6221
  • Location: Toledo
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #9 on: June 29, 2013, 08:14:22 PM »
 I can think of a couple lawyers in Lewis county that would do it for him. Or at least advise him. But it would probably be best to call attorneys in the county that the incident went to court in. Ask if they do that type of work. And get a consultation. Then you can get a quote on the cost and process.It may have changed since the person I know went through it. Plus an atty. in that county may not incure the fees associated with the travel time.

Offline stevemiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2679
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #10 on: June 29, 2013, 09:26:08 PM »
sorry to hear all this.all i can say is get the best you can afforf.after the dv and now these weapons charges if they push and they prob. will you will never be able to restore again.good luck to you and be sure everyone you know learns of this info you now have.
You must first be honest with yourself,Until then your just lying to everyone.

"The only one arguing is the one that is wrong"

Offline mountainman

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6002
  • Location: Wenatchee, Wa
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #11 on: June 29, 2013, 09:51:37 PM »
In any crime that would fall under the 4473 that would keep you from obtaining a fire arm..you have committed a criminal act. Many assume by getting their case expunged from the system means they have their rights restored. That is a misconception. Once it is expunged, you still have to pay an attorney and head back to court to get your firearm rights restored. Many people do not know that. I am just assuming that is the case here, as it was stated he thought he had his rights restored. It is a two step process, and it costs money, money for those lawyers...
« Last Edit: June 29, 2013, 11:34:09 PM by mountainman »
That Sword is more important than the Shield!

Offline Mike450r

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 1214
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #12 on: June 29, 2013, 10:03:42 PM »
There was a similar case a few years back and the guy had to do time.  It is pretty much a slam dunk felony conviction.

Can't get rights restored with a pending illegal possession charge.  Kinda like putting on a condom in the delivery room.  I understand him believing he still had his rights but that doesn't matter.

Offline stevemiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2679
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2013, 10:09:01 PM »
it can all be done with no att. 50 for expungement 200 plus for firearm restoration.get all paper work from the pros. att. office.go to court yourself if you qualify done if you dont the att.cant help but will still charge for all to figure that out.
You must first be honest with yourself,Until then your just lying to everyone.

"The only one arguing is the one that is wrong"

Offline stevemiller

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Posts: 2679
Re: restriction to possess firearms
« Reply #14 on: June 29, 2013, 10:10:24 PM »
but this all must be done before you posess or elsr you get the firearm felony and its game over
You must first be honest with yourself,Until then your just lying to everyone.

"The only one arguing is the one that is wrong"

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by kodiak06
[Today at 06:03:49 AM]


Yard bucks by Boss .300 winmag
[Yesterday at 11:20:39 PM]


Yard babies by Feathernfurr
[Yesterday at 10:04:54 PM]


Pocket Carry by bb76
[Yesterday at 08:44:00 PM]


Seeking recommendations on a new scope by coachg
[Yesterday at 08:10:21 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by high_hunter
[Yesterday at 08:06:05 PM]


Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by HntnFsh
[Yesterday at 07:58:22 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Yesterday at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Yesterday at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Yesterday at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Yesterday at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Yesterday at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Yesterday at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Yesterday at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Yesterday at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[July 03, 2025, 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[July 03, 2025, 05:42:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal