204 Inch Typical From Washington

[Dan-o]

Wow.....   just, wow.

I've never seen anything like that walking.....

[DBHAWTHORNE]

I'd be more impressed if this buck was taken over bait. 

[ridgefire]

Its not missing anything besides a few inches.. Like I said a beautiful buck that would be hanging above my fireplace if I ever shot a buck like that.

[bowhunterforever]

Now that's a big boy

[boneaddict]

I had him about 180-185.  He lacks long tines for a 200 inch deer.   Those are my own personal thoughts and answering the ? what does he lack.  IMO      That being said, BUCK OF A LIFETIME.   Drooling over such a trophy, congrats to the hunter.  What an animal!   

[pd]

Beautiful animal.  I have never seen such "flat paddles" (if that is the right word) for the tines/eye guard/whatever. 

[whacker1]

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2013/dec/11/landers-internet-abuzz-over-huge-whitetail/

[boneaddict]

Definitely worth reading.   Good story. 

[boneaddict]

That deer is amazing! I can't wait for all the " official internet picture scorer's" to be proven wrong. How many times do we have to learn you can't score a buck from a picture?

Awesome for the guy who shot that stud!

Sometimes its really not rocket science. 
A 150 whitetail is a great buck.  A 160 is a giant, a 180 is a gagger, and 200 well....
Just keeping it real. 

[MtnMuley]

That deer is amazing! I can't wait for all the " official internet picture scorer's" to be proven wrong. How many times do we have to learn you can't score a buck from a picture?

Awesome for the guy who shot that stud!

Sometimes its really not rocket science. 
A 150 whitetail is a great buck.  A 160 is a giant, a 180 is a gagger, and 200 well....
Just keeping it real.

I agree, and will also add that a 140" whitetail is a fantastic whitetail as well.

[300UltraMagShooter]

That deer is amazing! I can't wait for all the " official internet picture scorer's" to be proven wrong. How many times do we have to learn you can't score a buck from a picture?

Awesome for the guy who shot that stud!

Sometimes its really not rocket science. 
A 150 whitetail is a great buck.  A 160 is a giant, a 180 is a gagger, and 200 well....
Just keeping it real.

The left side of that buck has 200 written all over it.  I don't know what you mean by short tines.  The right side, I assumed you probably couldn't see it all in the picture. 

Looking at the right side, it is definitely not a 200 inch deer, but still huge.

[Fowlweather25]

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2013/dec/11/landers-internet-abuzz-over-huge-whitetail/

Good story, like i said in an earlier post. Maybe 190. Great buck. If youve seen enough good bucks its not hard to give a good estimate on score if its a decent picture. I cant wait for people to finally realize what it takes to make a 200" buck.

[huntnphool]

That deer is amazing! I can't wait for all the " official internet picture scorer's" to be proven wrong. How many times do we have to learn you can't score a buck from a picture?

Awesome for the guy who shot that stud!

Sometimes its really not rocket science. 
A 150 whitetail is a great buck.  A 160 is a giant, a 180 is a gagger, and 200 well....
Just keeping it real.

+1

[buck man]

Here is a 200 inch net buck for your comparison pleasure

[buck man]

Here is another 217" buck. Both of these 200" deer are Washington deer.