Free: Contests & Raffles.
Quote from: jyerxa on May 03, 2014, 08:20:55 PMYou really bring out the colors. Is that that new lens you got last year?Thank you my friend! I was using my Canon 5D Mark II, one of my Canon 24-105 F/4 L lenses. The camera was set to Manual, The ISO was 640, lens settings were f/22 at 28 mm. and shutter speed was 1/50th. of a second. Landscape setting.Dick
You really bring out the colors. Is that that new lens you got last year?
Quote from: runamuk on April 28, 2014, 08:25:36 AMI am curious if an artist might be allowed to critique? while I am not a photographer I am pretty educated in art, emphasis in sculpture and photography and visual arts education. I was taught to critique. However my own predilection is not even close to what many of the photographers might choose.PERFECT. An eye for composition, colors, and lines without getting caught up in technical photo crap. Last thing we need is another tool bag with an overpriced camera who is overly fixated on pixels and flash sync speeds... i.e. me Quote from: jyerxa on April 28, 2014, 01:07:32 PMQuote from: Bean Counter on April 27, 2014, 09:19:14 PMAlright guys, lets have it.......I love that photo's composition. Very cool. If I would try to take that same photo I would want to reduce the haze and make it sharp. Is there a way to do that? I don't know. That is exactly how you took this photo right?A circular polarizer is the way you reduce haze, reflections and enrich colors. Unfortunately, a polarizers effect is greatest 90 degrees from the sun, and almost worthless at 0 & 180 degrees from the sun. For this sunset shot, the sun was 180 to the moon--at my back. Polarization is one effect you cannot replicate in PP. The best we can do is play with colors, sharpness, and contrast. Quote from: wapiti hunter2 on April 28, 2014, 07:58:41 AMI like this shot. It is hard to capture the pastels of the low light and not overexpose the moon. Because of the pastels, I don't even mind that it is not sharp. Excellent composition too. So my question is. Was this an actual moment in nature or did you need to phptoshop it?I tried using Photoshop Elements and I hated it. Yes, that's really where the moon was at that time in the day. In addition to hating the interface of Photoshop, I don't like what it stands for. To me it has become more about graphic design than actual photography... cutting and pasting one object from one photo and putting it in another or making a fat person less fat or legs a bit longer than normal is just plain tacky IMHO Quote from: wapiti hunter2 on April 28, 2014, 07:58:41 AMI like this shot. It is hard to capture the pastels of the low light and not overexpose the moon. Because of the pastels, I don't even mind that it is not sharp. Excellent composition too. So my question is. Was this an actual moment in nature or did you need to phptoshop it?Your comments about sharpness along with the others about noise reduction are really what I was getting at... This is what I am lacking in my PP skills. Its a tool available to me in Lightroom but I don't seem to get it right. I need to watch more YouTube tutorials. One thing I'll say: the sky looks a lot smoother on the file on my computer, but somehow when it gets uploaded it gets more clumpy. Also, the foreground vegetation is a bit outside the depth of field because I am focused on the mountains in the distance and this is shot at F4 on a full frame. The greens were more meant to serve as framing and not be in the focal plane. I thought about stopping the lens down and cranking up the ISO to compensate but didn't want the vegetation in focus.Quote from: timberghost72 on April 28, 2014, 07:50:38 AMBC, cool photo. The moon with the sunlit peak is neat. Was this taken at high ISO? I'd maybe try and use a bit of noise reduction with adding some black and a little saturation on it. Definitely a keeper EXIF Metadata: ISO 320 with 200mm focal length for 1/400 second @ F/4 (full frame). I wondered if I had over saturated it!
I am curious if an artist might be allowed to critique? while I am not a photographer I am pretty educated in art, emphasis in sculpture and photography and visual arts education. I was taught to critique. However my own predilection is not even close to what many of the photographers might choose.
Quote from: Bean Counter on April 27, 2014, 09:19:14 PMAlright guys, lets have it.......I love that photo's composition. Very cool. If I would try to take that same photo I would want to reduce the haze and make it sharp. Is there a way to do that? I don't know. That is exactly how you took this photo right?
Alright guys, lets have it...
I like this shot. It is hard to capture the pastels of the low light and not overexpose the moon. Because of the pastels, I don't even mind that it is not sharp. Excellent composition too. So my question is. Was this an actual moment in nature or did you need to phptoshop it?
BC, cool photo. The moon with the sunlit peak is neat. Was this taken at high ISO? I'd maybe try and use a bit of noise reduction with adding some black and a little saturation on it. Definitely a keeper
Quote from: hunting4sanity on January 27, 2014, 03:31:28 PMhuntnphool, if you don't mind sharing, what was your camera setup for that awesome photo? Beautiful photo.f/8, 1/25th, ISO400
huntnphool, if you don't mind sharing, what was your camera setup for that awesome photo? Beautiful photo.
.... And I slip into my amateurish half manual and half auto mode. And sometimes fully auto mode with a flash. I’m happy with what my camera can do and the pictures I can get using half auto. But my camera can only do so much. I need to know how to use my camera in full manual mode when I see scenic pictures and move on from snapshots to photos. ...