collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Traditional vs Compound  (Read 25085 times)

Offline dbllunger

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 1072
  • Those who can do. Those who can't complain.
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #15 on: January 30, 2009, 03:23:32 PM »
I shoot a compound, and have to totally agree that it is much easier then a traditional.  Both are harder to shoot and kill with then a rifle. 

sisu

  • Guest
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #16 on: January 30, 2009, 03:56:42 PM »
:twocents:
Ill throw mine in too.  I hunt with a compound because it has a longer range, and it takes less practice to be accurate.  I shoot some traditional, but only for fun.  My boy and I are making him a traditional bow right now, and that is a lot of fun too.  If you shoot trad, you should be prepared to shoot a couple of arrows just about every day.  That "instinctive" shooting stuff is cool.  You don't know your mind/muscles/brain can work together like that until you start to do it...

Personally I think the instinctive shooting with the bow has helped my shotgunning ability, but then i might be getting better with age like an old Gruyere...

Offline runamuk

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2008
  • Posts: 17878
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #17 on: January 30, 2009, 04:03:17 PM »
 and I think they are prettier.  

Thats why I was so against a compound at first  :chuckle: they just aren't pretty enough ;) but now I have a goal, and when I do get a Trad bow I will get a really pretty custom one ;)

Offline Ray

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 6817
  • Location: Kirkland,WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1475043431
    • Hunting-Washington
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #18 on: January 30, 2009, 05:14:34 PM »
boneaddict,

I would agree with your assessments and direction. The compound bow is simply not a primitive weapon. Take a look at one next to a modern rifle and you can clearly see that a compound bow is more advanced with technological applications. I still recognize it as a stick slinger. Ultimately my desire to hunt with a bow is to challenge myself away from major advancements in technology first. The annual kill is not essential but definitely a goal. I am not a purist per say but that's the weapon which provides me with entertainment even if I am a failure. I can still feel as if I am having fun.

Offline bow4elk

  • Pacific Northwest Bowhunting
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2007
  • Posts: 3412
  • Location: Olympia, WA
  • Contact me at: tom@pnwbowhunting.com
    • https://www.facebook.com/pacific.northwest.bowhunting/
    • Pacific Northwest Bowhunting
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #19 on: January 30, 2009, 05:21:29 PM »
I know many guys who, once they've tagged a few animals with the compound, quickly convert over to traditional archery and many get way deep into selfbows.  I'm in both camps but if I had to choose today the one bow I'd use the rest of my life, it would be a yew selfbow of my own handiwork.
Official Measurer: Pope and Young Club, NW Big Game Inc., National Muzzle Loading Rifle Association, Oregon Shed Hunters
First Hunt Foundation mentor
Washington State R3 Coordinator

Pacific Northwest Bowhunting http://www.pnwbowhunting.com

Offline Hoytstaffshooter83

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 1208
  • Location: vancouver,wa
    • Great NW Rivers
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #20 on: January 30, 2009, 06:39:14 PM »
It takes a stick bow guy 2-4 seconds to pull back aim and shoot... a compound can be done in the 4-8 second range, and it always has been my feeling if you need to get a shot off that fast(2-5 with a compound) then its not a shot you should be taking in the first place,
Wow this an arrogant statement if I every heard one. I have a recurve bow, so you telling that if I release my arrow faster than you  shouldn't be taking the shot. That is the biggest pile of bovine scat I've ever heard. :chuckle:


Not at all, guys that shoot compounds state the quicker shot as a advantage, I believe that if the shot requires one to shoot as fast as you can with a tradtional bow then thats a shot that should not be taken period..... being able to shoot in 2 sec and NEEDING to shoot in 2 sec are entirely different.......

Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 11920
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #21 on: January 30, 2009, 10:31:33 PM »
By he way, if no one has said it yet, my hat is off to anyone who hunts big game with a traditional bow.  And if you make your own, then my whole head is off to you.  I'll get there one day...
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline PacificNWhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 3601
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #22 on: February 03, 2009, 07:04:03 AM »
Thanks for all the advice and offers to help. I am really interested in a traditional bow because to me it seem's like one of the purest forms of hunting. I'm still in a toss up right now, which I guess is ok. I did not get released from my Dr like I was supposed to yesterday and it looks like I'm going to be on "light" duty for another month with my wrist. Thanks again and I will keep you guys posted as time goes on.

Offline STIKNSTRINGBOW

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 4366
  • Location: Chehalis
    • https://www.facebook.com/stiknstring.bow
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #23 on: February 03, 2009, 12:20:40 PM »
I am a trad nut that started bowhunting with a compound, I actualy started hunting modern rifle, then went to handgun then muzzle, then archery. Now it is trad-only....you see where I am going. Anyhow the reason I am posting is I will be spending some time in the CF this year. If you would like to get together to sling some arrows I could bring a couple bows and you could check them out and see how they feel. I do have a compound I no longer use that you could check out also but I dont have a release anymore, If you could borrow one from somebody I could bring it also, but once you try Trad you get a whole different feel for the whole thing. Shoot me a PM and we can figure out a time and place.
The mountains are calling and I must go."
- John Muir
"I go to nature to be soothed and healed, and to have my senses put in order."
- John Burroughs
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor Trainer

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #24 on: February 03, 2009, 12:28:46 PM »
NICE OFFER!

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #25 on: February 03, 2009, 12:32:13 PM »
by the way...looking foward of plastering lots of pics on here of my new baby when I get it.  The wood is in the hands of teh master as we speak.....

Offline PacificNWhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 3601
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #26 on: February 03, 2009, 12:51:32 PM »
I'll shoot you a PM as soon I as I am allowed to put pressure on my wrist again. Thought I was going to be back to normal starting this month, but the Dr saw something she did not like on the x-ray and wanted to wait one more month. THANKS for the offer, you rock.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #27 on: February 03, 2009, 12:54:06 PM »
nothing like a bunch of one armed bowman out there. 8)

Offline PacificNWhunter

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 3601
  • Location: Bonney Lake
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #28 on: February 03, 2009, 01:27:10 PM »
 :IBCOOL:

We should start a club..

Offline STIKNSTRINGBOW

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 4366
  • Location: Chehalis
    • https://www.facebook.com/stiknstring.bow
Re: Traditional vs Compound
« Reply #29 on: February 03, 2009, 03:39:13 PM »
I will probably be poking around the E-line sometime within the next couple weeks, I'll let you know. I have an old 76er in 25# if you want to start light, and the next lightest one I have is a 30# Tamejun but the riser on that is pretty heavy, Most of my bows are 40-45# but I use 55-70# for elk.
The mountains are calling and I must go."
- John Muir
"I go to nature to be soothed and healed, and to have my senses put in order."
- John Burroughs
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor
NASP Certified Basic Archery Instructor Trainer

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal