Patraeus, Kelly Start Gun Control Advocacy

[pianoman9701]

Apparently the general was relieved of his obligation to our beloved Constitution.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/10/politics/david-petraeus-mark-kelly-gun-control/index.html

[pianoman9701]

It doesn't make sense to me that we start getting attacked and the General's instinct is to go for gun control. I don't get it.  I wonder if James Mattis feels the same way. Somehow, I doubt it.

[ctwiggs1]

We'll see what they push for.  I don't mind background checks, but I do very much mind registries.  Background checks have caught a lot of people.  They're relatively harmless for those of us who obey the law.

Curtis

[pianoman9701]

The only time i have a problem with background checks is when law abiding people are erroneously flagged and the lengthy process it takes to rectify that. It happens more often than you might think. Registry is out of the question. AR ban is out of the question. Magazine limits, out of the question.

[Bill W]

send Kelly back up in space!

[ctwiggs1]

The only time i have a problem with background checks is when law abiding people are erroneously flagged and the lengthy process it takes to rectify that. It happens more often than you might think. Registry is out of the question. AR ban is out of the question. Magazine limits, out of the question.

 

[Boss .300 winmag]

send Kelly back up in space!

Send them both to Mars on a one way ticket.

[bearmanric]

Traitors.

[kentrek]

Isis attacks paris and isis gets the blame...isis attacks here and they blame the tools isis used

It's disgusting and isis will take full advantage of it...this will happen again...regardless of any new laws

[pianoman9701]

Traitors.

I wouldn't go that far. Both served in combat. That means a lot. It just doesn't give them a right to turn their backs on our people and the Constitution.

[csaaphill]

Sorry the words shall not be infringed covers background checks, 4473's Gun permits, registration, NFA- all of it. Accepting one infringement means compromise and once you compromise your screwed, because once a new generation comes up not knowing what it was like before, and some that even fought against background checks, but now seem to accept them? means that they: the new generation will be more open to more infringements. All gun control is unconstitutional regardless what the courts said. The three branches: Judicial, Executive, and legislative were there to be the checks and balances not after the law is made. Courts rule any more on opinion, agenda, and emotion the no longer represent the people, and no longer represent the protection they were set up for.

[Wenatcheejay]

Traitors.

I wouldn't go that far. Both served in combat. That means a lot. It just doesn't give them a right to turn their backs on our people and the Constitution.

Not really. Service does not make one so entitled as to restrict RIGHTS of American citizens. There is no way I am going to bend over just because a couple of Liberals decided to betray the Constitution because the Clinton/Bloomberg money is just to good. That uniform and Kelly's wife's slurred speech gets no sympathy from me. Screw them, screw anti-gun, and screw anyone who supports them.

[pianoman9701]

I don't believe they're traitors. Kelly went through a lot with Gabby. Whatever Petraeus has going on, I don't know. I know I disagree with how they view the Constitution.

[csaaphill]

Traitors.

[Wenatcheejay]

It not hard for me. They are doing this for the money, they have amassed an empire worth million exploiting every bloody tragedy. They are jackals.

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk