collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Powder Volume to Weight  (Read 3200 times)

Offline Sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 2309
  • Location: Idaho, Northern
Powder Volume to Weight
« on: February 16, 2017, 04:41:31 PM »
Well, it was pouring like heck here today and boredom has set in.  I remember a post on one of the forums about the accuracy of the graduation marks on BH209 tube - how accurate they might be if used for measuring.  So just for drill I decided that what the heck let's find out!

I always load with a volume measure and over time I think I have become very consistent at using the measure...  I also decided besides testing BH which I use sparingly I would also test T7-2f for volume.

Here are a few pictures  that show the process I was using:







And this is the table that was created.... Hope the table makes some sense...



Not sure if this shows anything of much interest but it did keep me busy for awhile...
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - They are a blast!!

Offline Jonathan_S

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Oct 2012
  • Posts: 8999
  • Location: Medical Lake
  • Volleyfire Brigade, Cryder apologist
Re: Powder Volume to Weight
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2017, 05:12:34 PM »
Been shooting t7 3f per your reccomendation. Volume measures very consistent.

84 by weight of BH is a whopper!
Kindly do not attempt to cloud the issue with too many facts.

Offline Sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 2309
  • Location: Idaho, Northern
Re: Powder Volume to Weight
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2017, 06:04:38 PM »
Been shooting t7 3f per your reccomendation. Volume measures very consistent.

84 by weight of BH is a whopper!

T7-3f and the pictured volume measure + consistently filling the measure works very well for me also!
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - They are a blast!!

Offline jrebel

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+24)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 11345
  • Location: East Wenatchee
Re: Powder Volume to Weight
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2017, 06:13:01 PM »
So if you take the average weight of a particular load and weigh each load for your speed loaders, do you think it would make a difference in accuracy?  It would eleviate the crude volume measurement.   :dunno: :dunno:


Offline Sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 2309
  • Location: Idaho, Northern
Re: Powder Volume to Weight
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2017, 06:28:29 PM »
So if you take the average weight of a particular load and weigh each load for your speed loaders, do you think it would make a difference in accuracy?  It would eleviate the crude volume measurement.   :dunno: :dunno:

I believe... the weight of the thrown loads were so consistent for each type of volume measure.  I really doubt with all the external factors in shooting a ML you would see very little difference in accuracy for each group of shot.  As you look through the print out if you were to use the tubes you would be loading a more potent load than the same 120 grain volume from the brass measure.  So I really think the accuracy would not be effected.

Shooting caps with T7 really doesn't create a 'crud ring' unless you have a petroleum product in your barrel. I use synthetic oils for that reason since I shoot so much T7.

Using 209 primer will cause a 'crud ring' in the bore with T7.

The one really good thing about BH - no crud ring and no need to patch between shots, but again with percussion caps and T7 no need to patch either.

Keep shooting muzzleloaders - They are a blast!!

Offline JL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2017
  • Posts: 149
  • Location: NE
  • Groups: NRA, CCRKBA, RMEF
Re: Powder Volume to Weight
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2017, 10:43:34 PM »
Interesting data. Something I've never really considered. Thanks for sharing.

Offline Sabotloader

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 2309
  • Location: Idaho, Northern
Re: Powder Volume to Weight
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2017, 08:44:58 AM »
Interesting data. Something I've never really considered. Thanks for sharing.

Boredom - I had to do something - it was a torrential downpour over here!
Keep shooting muzzleloaders - They are a blast!!

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

GMU 247 Entiat bear hunting by Ridgerunner
[Today at 11:56:01 AM]


AUCTION: SE Idaho DIY Deer or Deer/Elk Hunt by Dan-o
[Today at 11:53:06 AM]


3 days for Kings by 3nails
[Today at 11:15:05 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by buglebuster
[Today at 10:28:52 AM]


Best all around muzzy (updated) by CamoDup
[Today at 09:41:58 AM]


Full moon and last week of September by vandeman17
[Today at 08:49:49 AM]


2025 Montana alternate list by CaNINE
[Today at 05:52:10 AM]


2025 Crab! by spin05
[Today at 05:11:11 AM]


Lynx kittens confirmed in the Kettle Range by WapitiTalk1
[Yesterday at 11:21:59 PM]


Cowiche Quality Buck by buglebuster
[Yesterday at 10:29:26 PM]


50 inch SXS and Tracks? by bearpaw
[Yesterday at 08:08:34 PM]


Accura MR-X 45 load development by kyles_88
[Yesterday at 08:03:44 PM]


Oregon special tag info by Judespapa
[Yesterday at 12:24:57 PM]


wings wings and more wings! by birddogdad
[Yesterday at 11:27:43 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal