Free: Contests & Raffles.
they sure look like they would both gross more than 160" theres a lot of bone on their heads.
What do you have against a nice, typical buck?p.s. Zammers!!!!!!!!!
Quote from: snake on May 08, 2017, 08:18:24 PMthey sure look like they would both gross more than 160" theres a lot of bone on their heads.I know, I've though the same thing but they were both officially scored at the Spokane bighorn show. The pictures make them look a little bigger than they are, they both actually have small compact frames. I believe that my 2013 buck grossed 162 7/8" and netted around 153...which doesn't even make Pope & Young. The 2015 buck grossed 164 1/8" and netted around 159" so he was Pope & Young. Sometimes I feel like score doesn't really reflect or portray how awesome an animal really is and I feel like both of these buck are a good example of that.
Beau, If you don't think you're a great hunter, you are kidding your self. I know you're just being modest. Congratulations; amazing bucks.