collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Cowiche ?  (Read 15685 times)

Offline jdb

  • the illustious potentate
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3797
  • Location: selah
Re: Cowiche ?
« Reply #30 on: June 04, 2017, 08:55:29 PM »
Elk numbers may be strong but deer numbers are abysmal
nuke the gray whales for jesus!

Offline yakimanoob

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2016
  • Posts: 1163
  • Location: Naches
  • big game | SAR | mountaineering
Re: Cowiche ?
« Reply #31 on: June 05, 2017, 08:17:15 AM »
Elk numbers may be strong but deer numbers are abysmal
Sure, but that's because of the Eurasian louse and adenovirus. It doesn't seem reasonable to blame wolves for low deer numbers in the region...
"master" hunter - still a noob.

Offline kevinlisa06

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2010
  • Posts: 1246
Re: Cowiche ?
« Reply #32 on: June 05, 2017, 01:41:55 PM »
The deer in there have been in trouble since the mid 1990's from what I have seen.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50512
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: Cowiche ?
« Reply #33 on: June 05, 2017, 02:17:36 PM »
Elephant in the room but we wont speak of it because its not PC

Offline millerwheeler

  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 1511
  • Location: Spanaway
  • Get out and put some miles on those boots
Re: Cowiche ?
« Reply #34 on: June 05, 2017, 02:41:34 PM »
Elephant in the room but we wont speak of it because its not PC


YES :yeah: :bash:


I also would add poor management of predators is a c9mtributing factor, bad practices by certain land management, lack of resources with fish and game, maybe a large amount of "specual" people who do as they want, , as mentioned the diseases  the deer.

There  is allot to contribute nobody is saying it's just wolves


« Last Edit: June 05, 2017, 02:47:20 PM by millerwheeler »

Offline jdb

  • the illustious potentate
  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+4)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3797
  • Location: selah
Re: Cowiche ?
« Reply #35 on: June 05, 2017, 02:45:21 PM »
Elk numbers may be strong but deer numbers are abysmal
Sure, but that's because of the Eurasian louse and adenovirus. It doesn't seem reasonable to blame wolves for low deer numbers in the region...
its not from Eurasian louse, and I've never heard of adenovirus, that herd has never truly came back from the winter kill of 92/93 much less 96/97. It's is also completely over hunted, it starts in September and those deer are under continued pressure until the middle of December. Not only that but it's arguably one of the most poached units in the state and also receives its share of native harvest. It's not that the wolves are responsible it's that herd is all ready on the brink of decimation, a super predator such as wolves could push it over the edge
nuke the gray whales for jesus!

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal