Yet another balanced AP article that only quotes the anti-hunting crowd and doesn't list any facts. Would it have been that hard to pick up the phone, call the bio and get a one-paragraph summary of the facts leading to this decision to pass along to readers? The way the article reads, they grizzlies are still in big trouble and the state just decided to repeat the activities that put them on the list in the first place.
Anytime an animal is removed from the list, it is like a bad thing anymore. Everyone should be happy that they are no longer endangered and have a stable population that can support state management.