I am thinking 1639 is gonna be tied up, and all the enforcement will be tied up for a few years. regardless of statements about enforcing or not. There are lots of questions, agencies are allowed certain leeway about how to enforce new laws, there is a lot to be determined about this law. Many terms need to be "legally" defined. what is enhanced training, what is "secure" storage? The problem I see is the public getting used to passing laws that do nothing.
Carl
Unfortunately, it is the responsibility of gun owners to comply with the law which means figuring that out. Either WA will not push these cases outside of adding it on to 200 other charges in egregious events or there will be a ton of cases going up to figure out what is secure and what is not.
Best case scenario is that SCOTUS picks up a case involving a lock mandate as a challenge to bearing arms.
