collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Why those Flintlocks were so Tall?  (Read 1422 times)

Online AL WORRELLS KID

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2017
  • Posts: 2153
  • Groups: Washington State Trappers Association
Why those Flintlocks were so Tall?
« on: March 18, 2019, 11:34:01 AM »
I once heard, that in the old days "Long Guns" were traded for Beaver Pelts by stacking them up until they reached the top of the barrel.
 By making the Gun Barrels longer than before, it would take more pelts being stacked up to reach the top of the Barrel. (sounds like they might be related to some of our modern day Traders).  :rolleyes:

 From its beginning in 1670, the Hudson’s Bay Company traded long guns on a large scale. By 1742, beaver pelts were valued at: one pelt for one pound of shot or three flints; four pelts for one pound of powder; ten pelts for a pistol; twenty pelts for a trade gun.
Doug
"If you can't laugh out loud you've already got one foot in the grave!!!!!" - Author Unknown, But... (Still Laughing)

Offline Trapper John

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2012
  • Posts: 1640
  • Location: Monroe, WA
  • Groups: Life member of: WSTA, NTA, ITA, NRA also member of FTA, F4WM
Re: Why those Flintlocks were so Tall?
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2019, 12:09:59 PM »

I hear that too.  Talk about ripping off the Fur Trapper.   :yike:
JC 


Offline Pathfinder101

  • The Chosen YAR
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Posts: 11929
  • Location: Southeast WA
  • Semper Primus
Re: Why those Flintlocks were so Tall?
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2019, 02:38:20 PM »

I hear that too.  Talk about ripping off the Fur Trapper.   :yike:
JC

Uhh, I think that was less for the fur trapper and more for the indians they traded with.  White people laying their own traps was more of an 1800s thing. 
Before you criticize someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes.  That way, when you criticize them, you're a mile away and you have their shoes.

Offline jackson7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Nov 2011
  • Posts: 350
  • Location: kitsap
Re: Why those Flintlocks were so Tall?
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2019, 02:41:44 PM »
thx for the education!

Offline JimmieD

  • WA State Trappers Association
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 35
  • Location: MINERAL
  • Matt 10:32-33
    • Kingdom Come Furs n Buckskin
  • Groups: NTA, WSTA, ITA, NMLRA, WSMA, Intermountain Fur Harvesters
Re: Why those Flintlocks were so Tall?
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2019, 07:55:33 PM »
Saw flintlock in the trapping section and got so excited I couldnt stand myself! Thanks for posting some of this history you heard! :tup:
"For what shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?"~Mark 8:36 (KJV)

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Jupiter Mountain Rayonier Permit- 621 Bull Tag by Hunter81
[Today at 07:22:50 PM]


Sauk Unit Youth Elk Tips by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:12:15 PM]


KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread by Boss .300 winmag
[Today at 07:07:33 PM]


MOVED: Seekins Element 7PRC for sale by Bob33
[Today at 06:57:10 PM]


3 pintails by metlhead
[Today at 04:44:03 PM]


1993 Merc issues getting up on plane by Happy Gilmore
[Today at 04:37:55 PM]


A lonely Job... by AL WORRELLS KID
[Today at 03:21:14 PM]


Unit 364 Archery Tag by buglebuster
[Today at 12:16:59 PM]


In the background by zwickeyman
[Today at 12:10:13 PM]


A. Cole Lockback in AEB-L and Micarta by A. Cole
[Today at 09:15:34 AM]


Willapa Hills 1 Bear by hunter399
[Today at 08:24:48 AM]


Bearpaw Outfitters Annual July 4th Hunt Sale by Threewolves
[Today at 06:35:57 AM]


Sockeye Numbers by Southpole
[Yesterday at 09:02:04 PM]


Selkirk bull moose. by moose40
[Yesterday at 05:42:19 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal