collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: really right stuff  (Read 2729 times)

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
really right stuff
« on: November 12, 2007, 06:22:41 PM »
anyone use a really right stuff bh-25 ball head? I have a killer set of carbon legs but my head weighs a pound. I see the rrs head is sub 8oz. I have been told their quality is in there with acra swiss......but I like to get opinions.

bone....

billy.....


anyone....


thanks,
Greg

Offline billythekidrock

  • Varmint
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 13440
Re: really right stuff
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2007, 06:30:21 PM »
Sorry,
Gonna have to wait for Bone or Pope...I have no clue.




Offline popeshawnpaul

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3583
  • Location: Bellevue, WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/smccully
    • Nature Photography
Re: really right stuff
« Reply #2 on: November 14, 2007, 02:07:46 PM »
I have not used the really right stuff before.  I have used the Arca Swiss ball heads when I shot with large lenses that weighed more than 10 lbs.  (anything 300mm f2.8 or larger needs a good head)  For most of you guys, any lens like a 300mm f4 or 400mm f5.6 requires a small ball head.  Anything from a Bogen/Manfrotto are ok.  The only thing I would suggest is go and put your largest lens on the head and try it out.  What i look for is holding power when at an angle, and more importantly you want it to be fairly smooth so that you can have the ball head just tight enough to move it smoothly but it will hold when you stop moving the lens.  Sometimes that deer moves and your head has to be able to move with it and remain stable.  For small lenses like most of you have, any of these brands make ok small ball heads that work.

P.S. - I have never been a huge fan of light tripods like the carbon ones.  In fact, I often would add sand bags to my metal tripods to further dampen vibrations.  However, they do serve a purpose when you are hiking quite a ways in.  I have seen some that have a bag that hangs under the center post of the tripod.  When they get to where they want to go and begin shooting, they fill the bag with rocks to make their tripod extra sturdy.  If you want tack sharp images, sometimes it's necessary.  (also use mirror lockup when possible)

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: really right stuff
« Reply #3 on: November 14, 2007, 06:14:44 PM »
I am using it more for my 30x60 leupold spotter. I can say that it is as I need, even with my pf80ed on it. if I need to I can hang my pack from the center...but not needed it yet.

thanks again.

Offline boneaddict

  • Site Sponsor
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 50475
  • Location: Selah, Washington
Re: really right stuff
« Reply #4 on: November 14, 2007, 07:49:20 PM »
I'm sort of silly with my tripod.  I bought a large tripos to shoot with my Canon A2E with its fixed 400mm lens.  It weighs a ton, and because I didn't spend the 10 grand, is fairly lengthy and heavy.  Now you see me with this huge tripos and tiny little digital camera.  Nothing lightweight about it. Sorry.  If I remember right, the leopold is a tiny spotting scope or one of the smallest.  I'm betting if you could use lightweight, that would be one to do it with. 

Offline popeshawnpaul

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 3583
  • Location: Bellevue, WA
    • http://www.facebook.com/smccully
    • Nature Photography
Re: really right stuff
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2007, 11:46:04 PM »
For a spotting scope I wouldn't worry about quality.  They will all do a fine job and hold that weight.

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal