collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Anti-Hunting Senator Wants to Become DNR Head  (Read 3530 times)

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14559
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: Anti-Hunting Senator Wants to Become DNR Head
« Reply #15 on: June 22, 2023, 12:27:53 PM »
Strangely, though, he was the only dem that didn't support that last assault weapon ban.

Offline Special T

  • Truth the new Hate Speech.
  • Business Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (+13)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 25060
  • Location: Skagit Valley
  • Make it Rain!
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
    • Silver Arrow Bowmen
Re: Anti-Hunting Senator Wants to Become DNR Head
« Reply #16 on: June 22, 2023, 01:01:56 PM »
If I remember correctly Van de wege won his last election with 65% ish of the vote.  That northern part of the Olympic Pensiula  runs pretty hard D.
In archery we have something like the way of the superior man. When the archer misses the center of the target, he turns round and seeks for the cause of his failure in himself. 

Confucius

Offline Joyce

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 29
  • Location: Clallam County
Re: Anti-Hunting Senator Wants to Become DNR Head
« Reply #17 on: June 22, 2023, 01:18:42 PM »
Strangely, though, he was the only dem that didn't support that last assault weapon ban.

My take on that is that he knew he wasn't running for reelection in the Senate so he didn't need to vote for it to maintain the votes to stay in office. If he had been running for reelection, my guess is that he would have voted for it. Again, a political animal behaving only as necessary to remain in power.

Offline Joyce

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Tracker
  • **
  • Join Date: Oct 2018
  • Posts: 29
  • Location: Clallam County
Re: Anti-Hunting Senator Wants to Become DNR Head
« Reply #18 on: June 22, 2023, 01:20:16 PM »
If I remember correctly Van de wege won his last election with 65% ish of the vote.  That northern part of the Olympic Pensiula  runs pretty hard D.

Correct. The anti-logging, anti-hunting voters are strong and getting stronger on the peninsula. It's a shame that so many of them are recent transplants from Puget Sound and California.

Offline blackdog

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2011
  • Posts: 637
  • Location: Coastal
  • Advocate ..
Re: Anti-Hunting Senator Wants to Become DNR Head
« Reply #19 on: June 22, 2023, 02:25:46 PM »
54% in the 2020 Election.

Offline salmosalar

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2019
  • Posts: 524
Re: Anti-Hunting Senator Wants to Become DNR Head
« Reply #20 on: June 22, 2023, 03:34:20 PM »
https://www.peninsuladailynews.com/politics/district-24-senator-eyes-state-lands-role/

Senator Van de Wege has been running the Senate side of Inslee's program to stack the WDFW Commission with Anti-Consumptive Use viewpoints. I'd certainly like to hear about what he specifically wants to do as Commissioner of Public Lands beyond the boilerplate 'I'm a firefighter, so I know how to deal with wildland fires' included in the article above. His voting record is enough to make me highly skeptical that he is anything other than a political animal willing to change his stripes to suit whichever way the current political wind is blowing.

Maybe it's time to start brainstorming for possible candidates that could have Westside voter appeal yet aren't anti-consumptive wildlife use or anti-natural resource use. Maybe Mr. Blake could be interested?

Ding ding ding!!!!!!!

Consider for a second that King County gets about 65 cents back for every dollar that it sends to Olympia. One would think that a candidate who was socially accepting of all and said, "Hey, I'll fight for you too. We are getting fleeced" would have an excellent chance, even in some parts of King Co. No Republican can be the one to say that because it's the R's that pushed for the "McCleary fix" that has exasperated the already overwhelming redistribution of funds  from urban to rural that the state budget represents.

The peninsula is an even better place for a moderate pro-sportsman politician. The issue is that politics have become national. Any candidate that aligns themselves with the Republican party has to deal with being associated with the National Republican Party. Frankly, that is a non-starter for far too many voters in Wa state and for important reasons. Additionally, a few recent SCOTUS rulings have made the social portion of the national Republican party platform even more disliked and increased the importance of socially liberal candidates to many more people in local elections. The same can be said for R's in some areas but as the last midterms show, the R's take over of the judiciary has become an election nightmare in more places than it has become a help to their candidates.

If you have a loved one who is gay, if you one of the 32% of the population that is atheist/agnostic/ other or if you are one of the 60% of Washingtonians who are pro-choice, the republican party is generally a non-starter as far as who to vote for. As an atheist, pro-choice father of a gay kid, I can tell you that I will choose those things over hunting every day of the week and twice on Sunday. This is even more true after the Dobbs and Kennedy cases.

I lobby my local rep's on hunting and fishing issues. Much of the issue as I see it is that the vitriol that they have seen come their way leaves them to not trust sportman and women or rural voters from conservative areas. Honestly, look at the politics section of this board or the Juneteenth "joke" someone posted here. Look at the bumper stickers at your local Cabela's. Hunters are doing a piss poor job of branding themselves. 

Offline buckfvr

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Posts: 4515
  • Location: UNGULATE FREE ZONE UNIT 121
Re: Anti-Hunting Senator Wants to Become DNR Head
« Reply #21 on: June 22, 2023, 04:09:32 PM »
Strangely, though, he was the only dem that didn't support that last assault weapon ban.


Didnt matter then, did it.  He knew that.

Offline 71Shovelhead

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jun 2013
  • Posts: 189
  • Location: Vancouver WA
Re: Anti-Hunting Senator Wants to Become DNR Head
« Reply #22 on: June 22, 2023, 04:25:58 PM »
Well put salmosalar.

Terry

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Looking for Taxidermist Recommendations by elkaholic123
[Today at 07:18:53 PM]


Found tripod by royalbull
[Today at 06:49:42 PM]


My new BB Gun by hollymaster
[Today at 06:48:48 PM]


We lost one of our own (Colockumelk) by bearpaw
[Today at 06:31:48 PM]


2025 deer, let's see em! by brokentrail
[Today at 06:29:59 PM]


Research Request - Deer, Moose & Elk Samples by andrew_in_idaho
[Today at 06:25:59 PM]


Idaho on the verge of outlawing by bearpaw
[Today at 06:21:52 PM]


2025 Deer season/hunter399 by bb76
[Today at 06:10:17 PM]


Hancock/Manulife........No Trespassing signs everywhere! What's the deal. by Tbar
[Today at 06:05:21 PM]


GROUSE 2025...the Season is looming! by Houmike
[Today at 03:16:47 PM]


re-barreling a gun by pickardjw
[Today at 02:20:48 PM]


Moose Hunt - Mt. Spokane North - Late Season Advice by shafump86
[Today at 12:39:58 PM]


2021 bear had been previously shot before I killed him by logola512c
[Today at 12:30:45 PM]


Color phase fox by redi
[Today at 11:23:13 AM]


Selling Pistols and rifles by Rat44
[Today at 10:58:30 AM]


Mt. St. Helens Goat by blackveltbowhunter
[Today at 10:58:11 AM]


Cabelas Pro-Series decoys by Hilltop123
[Today at 10:41:50 AM]


Selkirk bull moose. by Pathfinder101
[Today at 10:35:13 AM]


AKC Australian Shepherd Puppies by TeacherMan
[Today at 10:30:34 AM]


5x5 Elk Antlers by tgomez
[Today at 10:30:34 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal