HB 2434 Eliminating FWC

[Practical Approach]

 AN ACT Relating to eliminating the fish and wildlife commission in order to redirect efforts towards fishing and hunting culture for  tribal and nontribal persons; amending RCW 43.300.010, 43.300.020, 4 77.04.055, and 77.04.080; creating a new section; repealing RCW 5 43.300.040, 77.04.020, 77.04.030, 77.04.040, and 77.04.060; and providing an effective date.6 7 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF WAS 
https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2023-24/Pdf/Bills/House%20Bills/2434.pdf?q=20240119084409

[KNOPHISH]

https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=2434&Year=2023&Initiative=false

[Mtnwalker]

Had me right up until the part where the director is appointed by the governor

[hunter399]

https://app.leg.wa.gov/billsummary?BillNumber=2434&Year=2023&Initiative=false

Thank you,
I was in the process of googling trying to find it.

[hunter399]

Had me right up until the part where the director is appointed by the governor

I know that part sucks.
But.......
The director has a department to run.
That department runs better if you follow mandate.
Maximize hunting and fishing also maximize funding.
Which in turn, maximize management goals and needs.
Which benefits wildlife and stake holders for the entire state.

Where as the commission does not have any need to up hold mandate.
It also keeps the governor from packing the commission with anti-hunters.
Director is a one person job ,he can only choose one.

Plus commission has been riding that high horse mighty high these days.

[Platensek-po]

Had me right up until the part where the director is appointed by the governor

I know that part sucks.
But.......
The director has a department to run.
That department runs better if you follow mandate.
Maximize hunting and fishing also maximize funding.
Which in turn, maximize management goals and needs.
Which benefits wildlife and stake holders for the entire state.

Where as the commission does not have any need to up hold mandate.
It also keeps the governor from packing the commission with anti-hunters.
Director is a one person job ,he can only choose one.

Plus commission has been riding that high horse mighty high these days.

Who says a commissioner can’t become director? Imagine Lorna as director

[hunter399]

Had me right up until the part where the director is appointed by the governor

I know that part sucks.
But.......
The director has a department to run.
That department runs better if you follow mandate.
Maximize hunting and fishing also maximize funding.
Which in turn, maximize management goals and needs.
Which benefits wildlife and stake holders for the entire state.

Where as the commission does not have any need to up hold mandate.
It also keeps the governor from packing the commission with anti-hunters.
Director is a one person job ,he can only choose one.

Plus commission has been riding that high horse mighty high these days.

Who says a commissioner can’t become director? Imagine Lorna as director

Nothing says they can't become director.
Alot of responsibility with that job.
There might be a certain amount of interegety and accountability,that may not be the job for everyone.

[hunter399]

I'll support it,most likely won't go through anyway.

For the most part I believe the department does the best they can with the cards they are dealt.
They also have the best available science at there finger tips.
Also I have to think hunters would be more accepting of regulation changes if it comes from the department. Instead of commission that is being political lobbied by anti-hunting groups.

Even though I don't always agree with department suggestions.
Just want to say they do a great job with the BS That there handed.
Director.....right down to my district bio.
Sometimes you gotta make do with what ya got.
They do a great job.

[SuperX]

in this one-party state, the governor, house and senate are likely to be controlled by the same people who oppose hunting and fishing today.  I can't see anything changing at the broader level.

Full disclosure, I voted democrat in the last few elections but I will no longer vote democrat for governor or any senators or representatives that don't support hunting and fishing rights.  I hope I'm not the only one.

[Pegasus]

in this one-party state, the governor, house and senate are likely to be controlled by the same people who oppose hunting and fishing today.  I can't see anything changing at the broader level.

Full disclosure, I voted democrat in the last few elections but I will no longer vote democrat for governor or any senators or representatives that don't support hunting and fishing rights.  I hope I'm not the only one.

Good for you. Hopefully other people finally figure out that elections have lasting consequences.

[SuperX]

in this one-party state, the governor, house and senate are likely to be controlled by the same people who oppose hunting and fishing today.  I can't see anything changing at the broader level.

Full disclosure, I voted democrat in the last few elections but I will no longer vote democrat for governor or any senators or representatives that don't support hunting and fishing rights.  I hope I'm not the only one.

Good for you. Hopefully other people finally figure out that elections have lasting consequences.

Thanks, I feel like my culture is being cancelled.   Everyone in my family hunted, now I am the last of my clan who hunts and my family heirloom firearms have no one to be passed on to, and nobody to tell stories to of how they were used to feed our family.

[KNOPHISH]

Had me right up until the part where the director is appointed by the governor

This is kinda where I’m at also. This bill says director needs senate and house approval, where commission I think was only senate. The current commission is dragging the whole dept down the drain, and the rate is accelerating. So what do we have to lose that they’re already trying to take? I think if they followed the RCW on the selection process we might be in a little better position but they keep getting away with not.

[Mtnwalker]

in this one-party state, the governor, house and senate are likely to be controlled by the same people who oppose hunting and fishing today.  I can't see anything changing at the broader level.

Full disclosure, I voted democrat in the last few elections but I will no longer vote democrat for governor or any senators or representatives that don't support hunting and fishing rights.  I hope I'm not the only one.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, not all democrats are anti-hunting, but all almost anti-hunters are democrat. Votes have consequences and we as sportsmen are now feeling those consequences big time

[MeepDog]

How about a bill where the commissioners aren't appointed by the governor and it's instead a body of the district head biologists.  let the scientists make some decisions.

[SuperX]

in this one-party state, the governor, house and senate are likely to be controlled by the same people who oppose hunting and fishing today.  I can't see anything changing at the broader level.

Full disclosure, I voted democrat in the last few elections but I will no longer vote democrat for governor or any senators or representatives that don't support hunting and fishing rights.  I hope I'm not the only one.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, not all democrats are anti-hunting, but all almost anti-hunters are democrat. Votes have consequences and we as sportsmen are now feeling those consequences big time

Depends on where you live, probably true for the left coast.  In Minnesota it is a rare democrat who doesn't hunt or fish.  One of the bluest spots in the state - the Iron Range - has the most avid hunters I've ever known!  of course Hunting and Fishing and I think Trapping rights are all ensconced in the constitution.