collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Results of 3 point or better rule  (Read 2477 times)

Offline WAcoueshunter

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 2624
Re: Results of 3 point or better rule
« Reply #30 on: Today at 09:00:18 AM »
All these point restriction plans do is try and make up for a lack of game. That is the problem that needs to be attacked.

Yes, not enough animals for the number of hunters.  The main issue is that we have general OTC seasons and a million hunters.  Take off the APR and every buck with nubs would get shot.  APR slows down the harvest.  Only real solution is to limit the number of tags.  Rip the band aid off already and get it over with. 

Offline HunterStrait

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2014
  • Posts: 472
  • Location: Tri-Cities
Re: Results of 3 point or better rule
« Reply #31 on: Today at 09:41:29 AM »
All these point restriction plans do is try and make up for a lack of game. That is the problem that needs to be attacked.

Yes, not enough animals for the number of hunters.  The main issue is that we have general OTC seasons and a million hunters.  Take off the APR and every buck with nubs would get shot.  APR slows down the harvest.  Only real solution is to limit the number of tags.  Rip the band aid off already and get it over with.

Actually dealing with the opposite in my "neck of the woods" for farmland deer. I will see plenty of deer a year, but not enough hunters because the surrounding local landowners no longer allow hunters. Don't know how much my point matters because i hunt private, but it has been that way for the past few years and hasn't really improved the quality of bucks. The loss of access into private, as well as shrinking public lands, in my opinion is really just pushing everyone who doesn't have the same privilege into limited space and putting a lot of pressure and stress onto those herds.

Online Bullkllr

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2007
  • Posts: 4969
  • Location: Graham
Re: Results of 3 point or better rule
« Reply #32 on: Today at 10:08:23 AM »
All these point restriction plans do is try and make up for a lack of game. That is the problem that needs to be attacked.

Yes, not enough animals for the number of hunters.  The main issue is that we have general OTC seasons and a million hunters.  Take off the APR and every buck with nubs would get shot.  APR slows down the harvest.  Only real solution is to limit the number of tags.  Rip the band aid off already and get it over with.
They would also need to foresee how that would affect whitetail and blacktail situations and adjust accordingly there also.
Charlie Kirk didn't speak hate, they hated what he said. Don't get it twisted.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Charcuterie by Fletch
[Today at 10:18:01 AM]


Results of 3 point or better rule by Bullkllr
[Today at 10:08:23 AM]


turkey hunting question series - 4 by Mikey The Cat
[Today at 09:33:41 AM]


bc style down rigger rod by Crunchy
[Today at 08:58:57 AM]


Some nice animals from last season by Turner89
[Today at 08:57:05 AM]


blacktail deer bait by Bob33
[Today at 07:20:31 AM]


7 saum headspace gauges by edaniels97
[Today at 06:55:50 AM]


Flooded Corn: Senator Calls USFW To Conduct Formal Study by Fromm
[Today at 06:36:16 AM]


Skunks by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 09:09:22 PM]


A cougar tries to steal my cat by EnglishSetter
[Yesterday at 08:59:13 PM]


turkey hunting question series - question 3 by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 01:13:25 PM]


turkey hunting question series - question 2 by Pathfinder101
[Yesterday at 12:25:38 PM]


Oregon antelope by Bob33
[Yesterday at 11:54:37 AM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal