Hunting Washington Forum
Washington State Hunting Forum and Northwest Resource Site
Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
Free:
Contests & Raffles
.
Home
Help
Calendar
Advertise
Login
Register
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Poor results with all cameras
Advertisement
Advertise Here
« previous
next »
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
All
Go Down
Author
Topic: Poor results with all cameras (Read 6728 times)
Bob33
Global Moderator
Trade Count:
(
+3
)
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 21760
Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Poor results with all cameras
«
on:
July 14, 2009, 09:22:36 AM »
I'm about to give up. I can't seem to get any camera to work very well. I've tried the Cuddeback, the Bushnell, and now the Moultrie IR40. This morning I had my cat walk in front of the Moultrie at about 12 feet, in 60 degree weather, and it didn't trigger. I checked the camera from last night and had about five blank pictures.
Moultrie says this is their best selling camera, very few complaints, etc. etc. I've read the reviews and others don't have these problems (do they?).
Am I cursed? Is there a camera for less than $400 that really works well? I want something that would get a picture of an animal at 12 feet. Am I expecting too much?
Logged
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.
Advertise Here
whacker1
Trade Count:
(
+3
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5816
Location: Spokane
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #1 on:
July 14, 2009, 09:28:31 AM »
Time to go to a homebrew for the money - otherwise get into the Reconyx. I put my homebrew camera out last week for the first time and got some good pictures of a doe. I will be posting in the next day. Haven't downloaded the pictures yet.
http://www.reconyx.com/
I didn't want to afford a reconyx, so I went the homebrew route. I will be building another homebrew this winter.
Logged
Skyvalhunter
Washington For Wildlife
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Explorer
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16010
Location: Sky valley/Methow
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #2 on:
July 14, 2009, 09:43:41 AM »
If you are going to build a homebrew go with an external camera battery otherwise the battery life is poor.
Logged
The only man who never makes a mistake, is the man who never does anything!!
The further one goes into the wilderness, the greater the attraction of its lonely freedom.
tmike
Non-Hunting Topics
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1390
Location: Black Diamond
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #3 on:
July 14, 2009, 09:53:34 AM »
Don't give up yet. Sounds like you have invested a lot of $. Keep experimenting and make sure you have all the settings correct. I know on my Moultries you have to set the motion sensors. Make sure your camera is set up no more than 3 feet off the ground. Good luck.
Logged
Antlershed
Trade Count:
(
+8
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 4822
Location: Olympia, WA
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #4 on:
July 14, 2009, 09:54:17 AM »
Are you sure your camera was aimed right? There is a good chance your cat was too low to the ground to get picked up by the sensor. My cuddeback capture took pics from 1" in front of the camera to about twenty feet away.
Logged
Bob33
Global Moderator
Trade Count:
(
+3
)
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 21760
Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #5 on:
July 14, 2009, 10:05:23 AM »
My camera was attached to a tree, about 3' off the ground, and about 10' from a trail where the cat walked. I tested the camera in "IR Aim Test" mode and it detected my hand movement, but not the cat.
Logged
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.
BLKBEARKLR
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Frontiersman
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4092
Location: Roy, Washington
Taxidermist
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #6 on:
July 14, 2009, 10:10:35 AM »
I have 5 moultire's and never had a problem with any one of them. I would suggest playing with the sensors and adjustments some more.
Logged
22 years 3 months and 4 days, happily retired from the U.S Army.
Bob33
Global Moderator
Trade Count:
(
+3
)
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 21760
Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #7 on:
July 14, 2009, 12:02:38 PM »
"Can't you send Moultries back in and they fix them, or send you a new one for free?"
Yes, they said they would. The question is whether or not I have a defective one, or they all work this way.
Logged
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.
brianb231
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 764
Location: Puyallup, WA
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #8 on:
July 14, 2009, 12:42:21 PM »
well, I don't know if this helps you but,
I bought my first camera a few weeks back. It was a Moultrie D40 and everyone says they are cheap cameras, BUT....I set it up about 15ft off the trail about 6 ft high on the tree and angled it a bit down to the trail area. I did the IR aim and the Laser aim on it when setting it up. I have had awesome results. Dont know how many animals I am missing but I got 180 pictures of ELK over the course of 9 days. We just put my buddies StealthCAM out and it was more difficult to set up and test in the woods than the Moultrie D40. We have not checked it yet to see the results. Still Soaking!
For what it is worth,
Brian
Logged
brianb231
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 764
Location: Puyallup, WA
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #9 on:
July 14, 2009, 12:46:07 PM »
Pics from the D40 from previous post. It was set to Moderate quality.
Logged
SHANE(WA)
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Sourdough
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1297
Location: MEAD, WA
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #10 on:
July 14, 2009, 02:47:04 PM »
Love my I40, always worked great
Logged
jackelope
Administrator
Trade Count:
(
+29
)
Legend
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 50348
Location: Duvall, WA
Groups: jackelope
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #11 on:
July 14, 2009, 03:15:59 PM »
it looks like you might have got a kangaroo in action in that 2nd one..
Logged
" In today's instant gratification society, more and more pressure revolves around success and the measurement of one's prowess as a hunter by inches on a score chart or field photos produced on social media. Don't fall into the trap. Hunting is-and always will be- about the hunt, the adventure, the views, and time spent with close friends and family. " Ryan Hatfield
My posts, opinions and statements do not represent those of this forum
brianb231
Trade Count:
(
0
)
Longhunter
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 764
Location: Puyallup, WA
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #12 on:
July 14, 2009, 03:59:45 PM »
Yeah it does, I piced the wrong one, It was suppose to be this one.....
Logged
whacker1
Trade Count:
(
+3
)
Old Salt
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 5816
Location: Spokane
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #13 on:
July 14, 2009, 04:22:39 PM »
My homebrew lasts over 2 weeks in the field. so life shouldn't be an issue, unless you are looking to leave it out for months at a time.
Logged
Bob33
Global Moderator
Trade Count:
(
+3
)
Legend
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 21760
Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Poor results with all cameras
«
Reply #14 on:
July 14, 2009, 06:40:26 PM »
Brian, you wrote "I set it up about 15ft off the trail about 6 ft high on the tree and angled it a bit down to the trail area. I did the IR aim and the Laser aim on it when setting it up. I have had awesome results."
Where exactly does your IR aim hit at 15 feet? How far off the ground did you point it?
Logged
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.
Advertise Here
Print
Pages: [
1
]
2
All
Go Up
« previous
next »
Hunting Washington Forum
»
Community
»
Photo & Video
»
Poor results with all cameras
Advertisement
Advertise Here
Quick Links
Front Page
Donate To Forum
Advertise on H-W
Recent Posts
Articles
Forum Rules
Recent Topics
North Sea Fishing trip
by
Fidelk
[
Today
at 07:57:15 AM]
Need information on having a gunsmith thread a barrel for thin walled chokes.
by
salish
[
Today
at 07:25:03 AM]
Westside muzzy bull
by
ELKBURGER
[
Today
at 06:08:20 AM]
Early Huckleberry Bull Moose tag drawn!
by
HillHound
[
Today
at 02:32:41 AM]
Easy To Use GMRS Radios
by
Machias
[
Today
at 01:38:37 AM]
I'm Going To Need Karl To Come up With That 290 Muley Sunscreen Bug Spray Combo
by
highside74
[
Yesterday
at 10:43:42 PM]
AKC lab puppies! Born 06/10/2025 follow as they grow!!!
by
scottfrick
[
Yesterday
at 09:08:47 PM]
Lots of bear but scattered feed
by
Pete112288
[
Yesterday
at 08:32:45 PM]
KODIAK06 2025 trail cam and personal pics thread
by
kodiak06
[
Yesterday
at 07:20:18 PM]
49 Degrees North Early Bull Moose
by
wannabhntr
[
Yesterday
at 06:06:40 PM]
Archery elk gear, 2025.
by
geauxtigers
[
Yesterday
at 02:56:29 PM]
Leupold Display fade
by
ballpark
[
Yesterday
at 01:55:19 PM]
Should I come back or find someplace else?
by
BigredRusch
[
Yesterday
at 01:51:29 PM]
Brittany spaniel puppy
by
huntnfmly
[
Yesterday
at 01:51:00 PM]
Also looking for help deciding on a scope
by
Sakko300wsm
[
Yesterday
at 01:05:49 PM]
Best all around muzzy (updated)
by
trophyhunt
[
Yesterday
at 12:09:26 PM]
Wa, Or & NW Regional Sanctioned Duck Calling Contest
by
Brute
[
Yesterday
at 11:28:33 AM]
2025 Montana alternate list
by
tdot24
[
Yesterday
at 08:24:52 AM]
10 years ago- Now
by
kball4
[
Yesterday
at 07:33:37 AM]
Up DATE!1993 Merc issues getting up on plane
by
EnglishSetter
[July 13, 2025, 06:57:24 PM]
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal