collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: full contain vs just fall away rest  (Read 2616 times)

Offline grousetracker

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 534
  • Location: centralia
full contain vs just fall away rest
« on: December 15, 2009, 05:38:23 PM »
i have a ripcord and a g5 rest, the g5 requires me to use my finger to hold the arrow on when stalking but my arrows fly great. the ripcord holds my arrow without the finger and the arrows fly good, but the rest froze up once and cost me a cow. which is better? p.s. i was thinking on hunting a little out of a tree stand.

Offline 1bowhunter1

  • WORK?
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2008
  • Posts: 572
  • Location: Brush Prairie Washington
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #1 on: December 15, 2009, 05:53:29 PM »
Not Frozen
The wife said if I go hunting 1 more time, she's going 2 leave me!!  Gosh I'm gonna miss her.

Offline D-Rock425

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+12)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 13261
  • Location: Lake stevens
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2009, 09:12:12 AM »
I hunt with a QAD ultra rest its just like the rip cord.  I have never had a problem with that rest.  I've shot a few elk out of a tree stand with it too.

Offline bullcanyon

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2007
  • Posts: 1293
  • Location: Lewiscounty
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2009, 06:18:32 AM »
I am all about the containment for hunting.  Tried several rests.  Had the qad, but it started sticking just slightly up.  Using the trophy taker extreme now, but I don't think I like it.  Too much room for the arrow to bounce around in there.  Corey showed me the tri van and I think I might give that a try.  Looks to be about the best containment rest out right now.

Offline mtbiker

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 400
  • Location: renton, wa
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2009, 09:37:36 AM »
I am also going to go with a Tri-Van for my new 2010 bow.  I was at xXxArchery this week and Cory was showing me the Tri-Van ( http://www.midatlanticarchery.com/tri-van-vanishing-archery-rest.php ).  The nice thing is that if it doesn't open for whatever reason your arrow will still shoot through.  In this case you'll be shooting through a Hostage like rest.  BTW, I currently have a QAD Ultra Rest and have never had any issues with it.  I just like the idea and design of the Tri-Van.

Offline coonhound

  • Jeff ><>
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 687
  • Location: Lewis County
  • Jeff ><>
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2009, 09:39:22 AM »
I've been shooting the original Trophy Taker for years, the prongs aren't deep and there's no containment.  I have never had an instance where it got me in trouble.  I did own the QAD for a while and it failed to fall a few times, I think I'm more concerned about keeping it simple.

Coon

Offline funkster

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2007
  • Posts: 6913
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2009, 02:11:53 PM »
I use the QAD ultra and have had no problems with it either. I really like this rest and played around with it durning the cold weather this past week with no failures. I have had the rip cord and the trophy ridge drop slide on my Reezen before I was completely happy!
If you want to make it,
you can't fake it,
you gotta live it.

"Lynch would serve him up about 5 yards of new-age-football reverse propulsion."- Bullkllr

“Patrick Mahomes is what Seahawks fans think Russell Wilson is.”

Offline Geno

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 230
  • Location: Twisp, Wa
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2009, 02:27:32 PM »
I have the Tri-van on my bow and overall I am happy with it. Your arrow (depending on the diameter) can still squeeze through the containment if it gets caught on something while you hunt. It happened to me a couple of times. Not a problem if you notice it prior to drawing back, it's very obvious if it happens.

Offline grousetracker

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 534
  • Location: centralia
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2009, 07:50:05 PM »
i guess i will just practice more with the g5, im just worried about pulling the nock off the string from using my finger to hold the arrow on the rest. thanks guys

Offline Alan K

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+8)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 3025
  • Location: Lewis County, WA
  • University of Idaho Alumni
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #9 on: December 19, 2009, 07:53:46 PM »
Only reason your ripcord rest 'froze' up is the part that pinches your string got loose and gave it too much slack.  It's happened to me too, but only while target shooting.  I make sure it's tight each time I head out.

Offline carpsniperg2

  • Site Sponsor
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+126)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Posts: 31528
  • Location: Goldendale,WA
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #10 on: December 19, 2009, 07:54:17 PM »
i used to shoot a biscut but switched to a drop away full containment by trophy taker less friction and a bit faster.
Owner: SPLIT DIAMOND TACTICAL
Firearms/Transfers/Parts/Optics
2011 HW Head Competition Winner

Offline let.it.fly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Longhunter
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Posts: 657
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #11 on: December 22, 2009, 07:35:33 AM »
quick tune ftw. kinda like a buscuit but it has 100% vane clearance.

Offline Crunchy

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2007
  • Posts: 4944
  • Location: Puyallup
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #12 on: December 22, 2009, 07:47:22 AM »
I'm seriously thinking of switching to a whisker biscut.  Twice this year I had mere seconds to shoot drew back too quickly and pulled the arrow off of the rest launcher arm.

Offline wildmanoutdoors

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Posts: 2459
  • Location: Port Orchard
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #13 on: December 22, 2009, 08:13:27 AM »
QAD ultra all the way. No finger to keep it there. Contains while stocking, quiet and perfect shot after shot. Its the only rest Ill ever use. Truly impressed with it.

Online Lowedog

  • Trade Count: (+6)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2007
  • Posts: 2624
Re: full contain vs just fall away rest
« Reply #14 on: December 22, 2009, 08:24:48 AM »
Here's another option for a full contain. http://www.newarchery.com/products/2-32/arrowrests/quiktune-sizzor.html  I have been shooting with this rest for about a year with no problems.  Tunes easy and you can let down without triggering the rest. 

There are some videos on the linked page that show it in action and talk about set up.
"Ethical behavior is doing the right thing when no one else is watching- even when doing the wrong thing is legal."
— Aldo Leopold

 


* Advertisement

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal