Free: Contests & Raffles.
I think i need to get one the new blackhawk's
I love my Rugers, I love new inovation. But this is a total waste of time with a cartridge between the 38spl and 357mag. I hold it just as worthless as the 338 Federal. There's already a cartridge that fits this role.. It's called the 38super and could have used moon clips to fire in a revolver if they really wanted it on that platform. I'd rather see them come up with a semi-auto that would hold its own with the M&P series. "NEAR" magnum performance for 'recoil light hearted' shooters. -Steve
I have to disagree with you there Jack I see it as an interesting little round and think an 8 shot b-hawk would be pretty fun to play with!
While I love ruger revolvers and there .22's I have always been less than impressed with there attempts at centerfire auto handguns.
Don't get me started on the WSM series!
The 338 Fed gives me no jolly feeling either. Uh, Have you priced that stuff? And compared to the 338-06.. or the 35 Whelan, How is the 338Fed any better than them? The only advantage is that the 338Fed is designed for a short action rifle.
what, no love for the .358 winchester?
Quotewhat, no love for the .358 winchester?My Dad has a BLR in .358 he's put alot of blacktail in the freezer with it. damn fine round, i have never seen a deer run after being hit by it. Oh and i shoot a 325wsm
Quote from: superdown on January 06, 2010, 09:35:34 AMQuotewhat, no love for the .358 winchester?My Dad has a BLR in .358 he's put alot of blacktail in the freezer with it. damn fine round, i have never seen a deer run after being hit by it. Oh and i shoot a 325wsm What's the gun you've got chambered in 325wsm? I used to have one in a Kimber Montana. I've been thinking about getting another just not sure what make and model yet. I love the round, but I just never warmed up to the kimber. It just didn't fit me.
Thanks guys I'll check out Brownings website. Anyway since this a Ruger thread I'm gonna have to say that I'd like to see them chamber the GP-100 in 41 mag. Anyone with me?
41mag is a sweet cartridge! But although Ruger wheel guns are known for being tank-like, I'm not sure the GP100 would be strong enough for the 41mag. I think they'd have to put it in the Redhawk/Blackhawk platforms.I want Ruger to refine the trigger of the GP100 to be Colt Python smooth out of the box. That would be sweet. -Steve
Quote from: JackOfAllTrades on January 07, 2010, 08:06:28 AM41mag is a sweet cartridge! But although Ruger wheel guns are known for being tank-like, I'm not sure the GP100 would be strong enough for the 41mag. I think they'd have to put it in the Redhawk/Blackhawk platforms.I want Ruger to refine the trigger of the GP100 to be Colt Python smooth out of the box. That would be sweet. -Steve I'd be fine with a 5 shot GP. Allready have a 4 5/8 BH. Just a bit bulky.
Quote from: JackOfAllTrades on January 04, 2010, 04:09:39 PMI love my Rugers, I love new inovation. But this is a total waste of time with a cartridge between the 38spl and 357mag. I hold it just as worthless as the 338 Federal. There's already a cartridge that fits this role.. It's called the 38super and could have used moon clips to fire in a revolver if they really wanted it on that platform. I'd rather see them come up with a semi-auto that would hold its own with the M&P series. "NEAR" magnum performance for 'recoil light hearted' shooters. -Stevex2 you saved me some typin lolWhile I love ruger revolvers and there .22's I have always been less than impressed with there attempts at centerfire auto handguns.
ive seen a custom gp100 in 41 mag also saw one in 10mm cant remember who made it though
heres the 10mm gp100http://www.clementscustomguns.com/rugerdarevolvers.htmlfrom what i understand he doesnt do the 41 mag conversion anymore