Free: Contests & Raffles.
Why would you expect a rangefinder to work well in moisture? The object of a rangefinder is to display the distance to the object it is aimed at. Fog and rain reflect the laser back. Lots of moisture results in lots of signals returned, all from various distances. Which one is correct? The Leica design errs on the side of accuracy. If it cannot display an accurate distance, it will not display anything. If other models work in the rain, I would be more concerned than if they didn't. The signals should be reflecting off the rain drops and moisture and giving closer distances than the actual object.I've tried many, many units including Nikon, Bushnell, Swarovski, the 800 Leica LRF, the 1200 Leica LRF, and the Leica CRF. I like the Leicas best. The Swarovskis will range further, but they are heavier, larger, and have a large aiming circle which somewhat defeats the accuracy you need at the longer distances.
Ya, there is no sense arguing this point. To each his own. However, if there are any people out there seriously looking at buying a high end rangefinder, I would recommend going Swaro or Zeiss over the Leica CRF models if you plan on using it in the elements. They're a little more expensive, but when spending that much anyway, a little more $ shouldn't be an issue.
I have Leupold RX4, used them for two seasons and they have never failed me.